This article considers the problems faced by judges in law and policy disputes involving complex scientific and technological issues. It examines the historical development of government involvement in regulating recombinant DNA research, focusing on Foundation on Economic Trends v. Heckler, a challenge to the deliberate release of a genetically engineered microorganism into the environment. Although efforts were made to handle this case in terms of narrowly defined legal issues, this analysis demonstrates that cases like this produce an inevitable mixture of legal, scientific, and policy issues. The article considers the implications of this blending of issues for the study of controversies involving law, science, and administration.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allen v. United States, 588 F. Supp. 247 (1984).
2.
Ball, H. (1986). Justice downwind. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
Berg, P. , Boyer, H., Cohen, S., Davis, R., Hogness, D., Nathans, D., Roblin, R., Watson, J., Weissman, S., & Zinder, N. (1974, July 26). Potential biohazards of recombinant DNA molecules. Science, p. 303.
4.
Cavalieri, L. (1978). Science as technology. Southern California Law Review, 51, 1153-1165.
5.
Chargraff, E. (1976, June 4). On the dangers of genetic meddling. Science, pp. 938, 940.
6.
Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 467 U.S. 837 (1984).
7.
Culliton, B. (1976, July 23). Recombinant DNA: Cambridge City Council votes moratorium. Science, pp. 300-301.
8.
Diamond v. Chakrabarty 447 U.S. 303 (1980).
9.
Environmental Defense Fund v. Ruckelshaus, 439 F.2d 584 (D.C. Cir. 1971).
10.
Foundation on Economic Trends v. Carlucci, 1988 WL 60333 (D.D.C. 1988).
11.
Foundation on Economic Trends v. Heckler, 587 F. Supp. 753 (D.D.C. 1984).
12.
Foundation on Economic Trends v. Heckler, 756 F.2d 143 (D.C. Cir. 1985).
13.
Foundation on Economic Trends v. Lyng, Civil Action No. 87-02909 (D.D.C. 1990).
14.
Foundation on Economic Trends v. Thomas, 637 F. Supp. 25 (D.D.C. 1986).
15.
Foundation on Economic Trends v. Weinberger, 610 F. Supp. 829 (1985).
16.
Golden, W. (Ed.). (1988). Technology advice to the president, Congress, and judiciary. New York: Pergamon.
17.
Industrial Union AFL-CIO v. American Petroleum Institute, 448 U.S. 607 (1980).
18.
Judson, H. (1975, June). Fearful of science. Harper's, pp. 70-76.
19.
Kahn, J. (1986, August 10). Ice-minus. San Francisco Examiner Image, pp. 19-22, 38.
20.
Motor Vehicle Manufacturers' Association v. State Farm Mutual, 463 U.S. 29 (1983).
21.
NLRB v. Curtin Matheson Scientific, 108 L Ed. 2d 801 (1990).
22.
O'Brien, D. (1987). What process is due?New York: Russell Sage.
23.
Pendorf, S. (1985). Regulating the Environmental Release of Genetically Engineered Organisms: Foundation on Economic Trends v. Heckker. Florida State University Law Review, 12, 891-921.
24.
Schneider, K. (1986a, May 30). Test is due today on gene altering. New York Times, p. A15.
25.
Schneider, K. (1986b, May 31). Gene-altered tobacco is planted in Wisconsin. New York Times, p. A9.
26.
Schuck, P. (1986).Agent Orange on trial. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
Shapiro, S. (1990). Biotechnology and the design of regulation. Ecology Law Quarterly, 17, 1-70.
28.
Singer. M. , & Soll, D. (1973. September 21). Guidelines for DNA hybrid molecules. Science, p. 1114.
29.
Sinsheimer, R. (1975, October 16). Troubled dawn for genetic engineering. New Scientist, pp. 148-151.
30.
Swazey, J. , Sorenson, J., & Wong, C. (1978). Risk and benefits, rights and responsibilities: A history of the recombinant DNA controversy. Southern California Law Review, 51, 1019-1078.
31.
U.S. Council on Environmental Quality. (1983). 40 C.F.R. § 1502.
32.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency . (1984). Microbial pesticides; Interim policy on small scale field testing. 49 Fed. Reg. 40659-40661.
33.
U.S. General Accounting Office . (1988). Biotechnology: Managing the risks of field testing genetically engineered organisms. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
34.
U.S. House . (1978). Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Science, Research and Technology of the Committee on Science and Technology: Recombinant DNA Act.95th Cong., 2nd Sess.
35.
U.S. House . (1982). Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight of the Committee on Science and Technology: Potential application of recombinant DNA and genetics on agricultural sciences.97th Cong., 2nd Sess.
36.
U.S. House . (1984). Report of the Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight of the Committee on Science and Technology: The environmental implications of genetic engineering.98th Cong., 2nd Sess.
37.
U.S. House . (1986). Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight of the Committee on Science and Technology. "Ice-Minus": A case study of EPA `s review of genetically engineered microbial pesticides.99th Cong., 2nd Sess.
38.
U.S. National Institutes of Health . (1976). Recombinant DNA research guidelines. 41 Fed. Reg. 27902-27943.
39.
U.S. National Institutes of Health . (1977). Environmental impact statement on NIH guidelines for research involving recombinant DNA molecules. Reprinted as exhibit B to federal defendants' motion dated May 3, 1984, in Foundation on Economic Trends v. Heckler, Civil Action No. 83-2714, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
40.
U.S. National Institutes of Health . (1978a). Recombinant DNA research proposed revised guidelines. 43 Fed. Reg. 33042-33178.
41.
U.S. National Institutes of Health . (1978b). Recombinant DNA research revised guidelines. 43 Fed. Reg. 60080-60105, 60108-60131.
42.
U.S. National Institutes of Health . (1982). Recombinant DNA research; Actions under guidelines. 47 Fed. Reg. 17166-17177, 17180-17198.
43.
U.S. National Institutes of Health . (1983). Recombinant DNA research; Actions under guidelines. 48 Fed. Reg. 24548-24553.
44.
U.S. Office of Technology Assessment . (1988). New developments in technology. Vol. 3: Field-testing engineered organisms. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
45.
U.S. Senate . (1980). Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Science, Technology and Space of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation: Industrial applications of recombinant DNA techniques.96th Cong., 2nd Sess.
46.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 435 U.S. 519 (1977).
47.
Wade, N. (1974, July 26). Genetic manipulation: Temporary embargo proposed on research. Science, pp. 332-334.
48.
Wade, N. (1975a, November 11). Recombinant DNA: NIH group stirs storm by drafting laxer rules. Science, pp. 767-769.
49.
Wade, N. (1975b, December 19). Recombinant DNA: NIH sets strict rules to launch new technology. Science, pp. 1175-1179.
50.
Wade, N. (1976a, October 15). Recombinant DNA: Acritic questions the right to free inquiry. Science, pp. 303-306.
51.
Wade, N. (1976b, February 27). Recombinant DNA: Guidelines debated at public hearing. Science, pp. 834-836.
52.
Walsh, J. (1981, September 18). Biotechnology boom reaches agriculture. Science, pp. 1339-1341.
