The Public Agency as Polis

Abstract

This article offers a view of active citizenship in an administrative context. It argues that the classic features of active citizenship-authoritative action, public interest focus, practical wisdom, and community can be enacted in an agency setting, when community people join with professional administrators in exercising a measure of administrative discretion. Using a framework developed from the theories of Anthony Giddens, it is suggested that such interaction between lay citizens and administrators, constrained and enabled by bureaucratic rules and resources, constitutes a polis, a public space in which members act together in order to achieve limited ends and to lead a virtuous life. The federal Community Health Center program in the Bureau of Health Care Delivery and Assistance, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, is offered as an illustration.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Arendt, H. (1963). On revolution. New York: Penguin.

Aristotle . (1981). The politics (T. A. Sinclair, trans.). New York: Penguin.

Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Cooke, J. E. (Ed.). (1961). The Federalist. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.

Cooper, T. L. (1980). Bureaucracy and community organization. Administration andSociety, 11, 411-444.

Cooper, T. L. (1984). Citizenship and professionalism in public administration. Public Administration Review, 44, 143-149.

Flathman, R. E. (1966). The public interest. New York: Wley.

Gadamer, H. G. (1977). Philosophical hermeneutics ( D. C. Linge , Trans. & Ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.

10.

Gawthrop, L. C. (1984). Civis, civitas, and civilitas: A new focus for the year 2000. Public Administration Review, 44, 101-106.

11.

Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.

12.

Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

13.

Giddens, A. (1987). Social theory and modern sociology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

14.

Gittell, M. (1980). Limits to citizen participation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

15.

Kweit, M. G. , & Kweit, R. (1984). The politics of policy analysis: The role of citizen participation in analytic decision-making. Policy Studies Review, 3, 234-245.

16.

MacNair, R. H. , Caldwell, R. , & Pollane, L. (1983). Citizen participation in public bureaucracies: Foul weather friends. Administration & Society, 14, 507-524.

17.

Mosher, F. L. (1969). Democracy and the public service. New York: Oxford University Press.

18.

Pennock, J. R. (1979). Democratic political theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

19.

Rohr, J. A. (1984). Civil servants and second class citizens. Public Administration Review, 44, 135-140.

20.

Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the grass roots. Berkeley: University of California Press.

21.

Stivers, C. (1988). Active citizenship in the administrative state. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg.

22.

Waldo, D. (1948). The administrative state. New York: Ronald Press.

23.

Wamsley, G. L. , Goodsell, C. T. , Rohr, J. A. , Stivers, C. M. , White, O. F. , & Wolf, J. F. , (1987). The public administration and the governance process: Refocusing the American dialogue. In R. C. Chandler (Ed.), A centennial history of the American administrative state (pp. 291-320). New York: Free Press.

24.

Wolf, J. F. , & Bacher, R. C. , (n.d.). The public administrator: The worlds of public service occupations [photocopy]. Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.