This article employs standard citation analysis techniques to rank the research value of public administration journals. Although prestige is a suspect measure of quality, esteem surveys have been used to rate the perceived importance of journals in many fields (including public administration). By gauging actual consumption rather than estimated value, citation analysis offers a better method of assessing journal worth. The three citation rankings presented in this study confirm the importance of such prestigious journals as Public Administration Review; American Political Science Review, and Administration Science Quarterly. In some cases, however, the citation hierarchies differ considerably from the esteem ratings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, G. L. , & Peery, J. C. (1980). If you can name it, I can rate it. American Psychologist, 35, 109-110.
2.
Allen, E. S. (1929). Periodicals for mathematicians. Science, 70, 592-594.
3.
Billings, B. B. , & Viksnins, G. J. (1972). The relative quality of economics journals: An alternative rating system. Western Economic Journal, 10, 467-469.
4.
Boor, M. (1973). Unfamiliarity breeds disdain. American Psychologist, 28, 1012-1013.
5.
Bowman. J. S. . & Hajjar, S. G. (1978a). The literature of American public administration: Its contents and contributors. Public Administration Review, 38, 156-165.
6.
Bowman, J. S. . & Hajjar, S. G. (1978b). English-language journals in public administration: An analysis. Public Administration, 56, 203-225.
7.
Buffardi. L. C. , & Nichols. J. A. (1981). Citation impact, acceptance rate, and APA journals. American Psychologist, 36, 1453-1456.
8.
Buss, A. R. . & McDermott, J. R. (1976). Ratings of psychology journals compared to objective measures of journal impact. American Psychologist, 31, 675-678.
9.
Caiden. G. E. , Loverd. R. A.. Pavlak, T. J., Sipe, L. F., & Wong, M. M. (1983). American public administration: A bibliographical guide to the literature. New York: Garland.
10.
Christenson, J. A. , & Sigelman, L. (1985). Accrediting knowledge: Journal stature and citation impact in social science. Social Science Quarterly, 66, 964-975.
11.
Coe, R. , & Weinstock, I. (1983). Evaluating the finance journals: The department chairperson's perspective. Journal of Financial Research, 6, 345-349.
12.
Coe. R. , & Weinstock, I. (1984). Evaluating the management journals: A second look. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 660-666.
13.
Fabianic. D. A. (1980). Perceived scholarship and readership of criminal justice journals. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 8, 15-20.
14.
Fry, E. H. , Walters, C. G.. & Scheuermann, L. E. (1985). Perceived quality of fifty selected journals: Academicians and practitioners. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 13, 352-361.
15.
Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178, 471-479.
16.
Garfield, E. (1984). Anthropology journals: What they cite and what cites them. Current Anthropology;25, 514-519.
17.
Giles. M. W. , & Wright, G. C. (1975). Political scientists'evaluations of sixty-three journals. PS-8, 254-256.
18.
Glenn, N. D. (1971). American sociologists' evaluations of sixty-three journals. American Sociologist, 6. 298-303.
19.
Gordon, M. D. (1982). Citation ranking versus subjective evaluation in the determination of journal hierarchies in the social sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33, 55-57.
20.
Gross, P.L.K. , & Gross, E. M. (1927). College libraries and chemical education. Science, 66, 385-389.
21.
Gvnther, M. D. (1973). On Mace and Warner's journal rankings. American Psychologist, 28, 1013.
22.
Hamm, W. , & Vocino, T. (1977). Evaluation of 41 journals by ASPA members. Bureaucrat, 5, 439-446.
23.
Hawkins, R. G. , Ritter, L. S., & Walter, I. (1973). What economists think of their journals. Journal of Political Economy81, 1017-1032.
24.
Haynes, J. P. (1983). An empirical method for determining core psychology journals. American Psychologist, 38, 959-961.
25.
Howard, T. P. , & Nikolai, L. A. (1983). Attitude measurement and perceptions of accounting faculty publication outlets. Accounting Review, 58, 765-776.
26.
Intrama, N. (1968). Some characteristics of the literature of public administration. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.
27.
Koulack, D. , & Keselman, H. J. (1975). Ratings of psychology journals by members of the American Psychological Association. American Psychologist, 30, 1049-1053.
28.
Lee, D. , & Evans, A. (1984). American geographers' rankings of American geography journals. Professional Geographer, 36, 292-300.
29.
Legge, J. S. , & Devore, J. (1987). Measuring productivity in U.S. public administration and public affairs programs. Administration & Society, 19, 147-156.
30.
Levin, J. R. , & Kratochwill, T. R. (1976). The name of the journal fame game: Quality or familiarity?American Psychologist, 31, 673-674.
31.
Levine, C. H. (1977). On evaluating journals. Bureaucrat, 5, 77-82.
32.
Liebowitz, S. J. , & Palmer, J. P. (1984). Assessing the relative impacts of economics journals. Journal of Economic Literature, 22, 77-88.
33.
Lindsey, D. (1978). The scientific publication system in social science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
34.
Luce, T. S. , & Johnson, D. M. (1978). Rating of educational and psychological journals. Educational Researcher, 7, 8-10.
35.
Luke, R. H. , & Doke, E. R. (1987). Marketing journal hierarchies: Faculty perceptions, 1986-1987. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 15, 74-78.
36.
Mabry, R. H. , & Sharplin, A. D. (1985). The relative importance of journals used in finance research. Journal of Financial Research, 8, 287-296.
37.
Mace, K. C. , & Warner, H. D. (1973). Ratings of psychology journals. American Psychologist, 28, 184-186.
38.
Martin, G. P. (1952). Characteristics of the literature used by authors of books on political topics. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Chicago.
39.
McCurdy, H. E. (1986). Public administration: A bibliographic guide to the literature. New York: Marcel Dekker.
40.
McCurdy, H. E. , & Cleary, R. E. (1984). Why can't we resolve the research issue in public administration?Public Administration Review, 44, 49-55.
41.
McDonough, C. C. (1975). The relative quality of economics journals revisited. Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, 15, 91-97.
42.
McNeely, J. K. , & Crosno, C. D. (1930). Periodicals for electrical engineers. Science, 72, 8 1-84.
43.
Perry, J. L. , & Kraemer, K. L. (1986). Research methodology in the Public Administration Review, 1975-1984. Public Administration Review, 46, 215-226.
44.
Poole, E. D. . & Regoli, R. M. (1981). Periodical prestige in criminology and criminal justice. Criminology, 19, 470-478.
45.
Reeves, B. , & Borgman, C. L. (1983). A bibliometric evaluation of the core journals in communication research. Human Communication Research, 10, 119-136.
46.
Robinson, W. C. (1973). Subject dispersion in political science: An analysis of references appearing in the journal literature, 1910-1960. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois.
47.
Rock, M. G. (1979). A handbook of information sources and research strategies in public administration. San Diego: Institute of Public and Urban Affairs, San Diego State University.
48.
Rounds, J. (1982). Theory and applied anthropology: An empirical approach. Human Organization, 41, 167-170.
49.
Rushton, J. P. , & Roediger, H. L. (1978). An evaluation of 80 psychology journals based on the Science Citation Index. American Psychologist, 33, 520-523.
50.
Sharplin, A. D. , & Mabry, R. H. (1985). The relative importance of journals used in management research: An alternative ranking. Human Relations, 38, 139-149.
51.
Shichor. D. . O'Brien, R. M., & Decker, D. L. (1981). Prestige of journals in criminology and criminal justice. Criminology, 19, 461-469.
52.
Simpson, A. E. (1976). Guide to library research in public administration. New York: Center for Productive Public Management, John Jay College of Criminal Justice.
53.
Smart, J. C. (1983). Perceived quality and citation rates of education journals. Research in Higher Education, 19, 175-182.
54.
Smart, J. C. , & Elton, C. F. (1981). Structural characteristics and citation rates of education journals. American Educational Research Journal, 18, 399-413.
55.
Smart, J. C. , & Elton, C. F. (1982). Consumption factor scores of psychology journals: Scientometric properties and qualitative implications. Scientometrics, 4, 349-360.
56.
Smith, N. L. , & Caulley, D. N. (1981). The evaluation of education journals through the study of citations. Educational Researcher, 10, 11-12.
57.
Stack, S. (1987). Measuring the relative impacts of criminology and criminal justice journals: A research note. Justice Quarterly, 4, 475-484.
58.
Stallings, R. A. , & Ferris, J. M. (1988). Public administration research: Work in PAR, 1940-1984. Public Administration Review, 48, 580-586.
59.
Stewart, J. (1970). The literature of politics: A citation analysis. International Library Review, 2, 329-353.
60.
Vocino, T. , & Elliott, R. H. (1982). Journal prestige in public administration: A research note. Administration & Society, 14, 5-14.
61.
Vocino, T. , & Elliott, R. H. (1984). Public administration journal prestige: A time series analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 43-51.
62.
Weisheit, R. A. , & Regoli, R. M. (1984). Ranking journals. Scholarly Publishing, 15, 313-325.
63.
White, J. D. (1986). Dissertations and publications in public administration. Public Administration Review, 46, 227-234.
