The status of Woodrow Wilson as a founder of the academic field of public administration is explored in light of Paul Van Riper's contention that Wilson's famous essay, "The Study of Administration, "had no influence on the evolution of the study or theory of public administration in the United States. The major focus is the politics/administration dichotomy. Kirwan, contrary to Van Riper, argues that Wilson's reputation as a major founder is richly deserved and he attempts to explain the nature of Wilson's contribution and its significance for the field today.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KIRWAN, K. A. (1977) "The crisis of identity in the study of public administration: Woodrow Wilson."Polity9: 321-343.
2.
RABIN and BOWMAN [eds.] (1984) Politics and Administration: Woodrow Wilson and American Public Administration. New York: Marcel Dekker.
3.
STORING, H. J. (1965) "Leonard D. White and the study of public administration."Public Administration Rev.25: 38-51.
4.
TAYLOR, H. (1958) The Statesman. New York: New American Library.
5.
VAN RIPER, P. P. (1983) "The American administrative state: Wilson and the founders—an unorthodox view."Public Administration Rev.43: 477-490.
6.
VAN RIPER, P. P. (1984) "The politics-administration dichotomy: concept or reality? in Rabin and Bowman (eds.) Politics and Administration: Woodrow Wilson and American Public Administration. New York: Marcel Dekker.
7.
WHITE, L. D. (1955) Introduction to the Study of Public Administration. New York: Macmillan.
8.
WILSON, W. (1941) "The study of administration."Political Sci. Q.56: 481-506.
