This brief article argues that contemporary public administration theory and practice can be well served by the competition between two opposing paradigms, each claiming the status of a disciplinary Weltanschauung. The two approaches in question, one reflecting pessimistic and the other optimistic views on the potential for societal betterment via the improvement of governmental administrative organizations and practices, are well reflected in the works of Vincent Ostrom and Robert T. Golembiewski and their respective kindred spirits. Because the issues that divide these two approaches are central to the question of proper democratic governance in the postindustrial age, the potential exists for a creative contribution to social life by public administration theory.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BALL, T. (1976) "From paradigms to research programs: toward a post-Kuhnian political science."Amer. J. of Pol. Sci.20 (February): 151-177.
2.
BARTON, A. H. (1980) "A diagnosis of bureaucratic maladies," pp. 27-36 in C. H. Weiss and A. H. Barton (eds.) Making Bureaucracies Work. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3.
BAY, C. (1972) "Thoughts on the purposes of political science education," pp. 88-99 in G. J. Graham, Jr. and G. W. Carey (eds.) The Post-Behavioral Era: Perspectives on Political Science. New York: David McKay.
4.
BELLONE, C. J. [ed.] (1980) Organization Theory and the New Public Administration. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
5.
BLALOCK, H. M. (1964) Causal Inferences in Nonexperimental Research. New York: Norton.
6.
BUCHANAN, J. M. (1970) "Public goods and public bads," pp. 51-72 in J. P. Crecine (ed.) Financing the Metropolis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7.
CROZIER, M. (1964) The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
8.
DOWNS, A. (1967) Inside Bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown.
9.
GOLEMBIEWSKI, R. T. (1977) Public Administration as a Developing Discipline: Part 1-Perspectives on Past and Present. New York: Marcel Dekker.
10.
GOLEMBIEWSKI, R. T. (1974) "'Maintenance' and `Task' as Central Challenges in Public Administration."Public Admin. Rev.34 (March): 168-175.
11.
GOLEMBIEWSKI, R. T. (1965) Man, Management and Morality: Toward a New Organizational Ethic. New York: McGraw-Hill.
12.
GOLEMBIEWSKI, R. T. and W. B. EDDY (1978a) Organization Development in Public Administration: Part I-Organization Development Properties and Public Sector Features. New York: Marcel Dekker.
13.
GOLEMBIEWSKI, R. T. and W. B. EDDY (1978b) Organization Development in Public Administration: Part 2-Public Sector Applications of Organization Development Technology. New York: Marcel Dekker.
14.
GOLEMBIEWSKI, R. T. and R. J. HILLES (1979) Toward the Responsive Organization: The Theory and Practice of Survey/Feedback. Salt Lake City: Brighton.
15.
GOODSELL, C. T. (1983) The Case For Bureaucracy: A Public Administration Polemic. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
16.
GOULDNER, A. W. (1955) "Metaphysical pathos and the theory of bureaucracy."Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.44 (December): 498.
17.
HARMON, M. M. (1981) Action Theory for Public Administration. New York: Longman.
18.
HUMMEL, R. P. (1977) The Bureaucratic Experience. New York: St. Martin's Press.
19.
Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research . (1979) Public Image of the Courts, 1977: General Public's Data (Codebook, ICPSR Study 7703). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
20.
IsHAK, S. (1972) "Consumers' perception of police performance-consolidation vs. deconcentration: the case of Grand Rapids, Michigan Metropolitan Area. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.
21.
KUHN, T. (1970) "Reflections on my critics," pp. 231-278 in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
22.
KUHN, T. (1964) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
23.
LAKOTAS, I. (1970) "Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes," pp. 91-196 in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
24.
LOVRICH, N. P., Jr. (1979) "Contending paradigms in American public administration: an empirical investigation of issues central to the Golembiewski v. Ostrom debate on public choice theory and democratic administration." Presented at the annual meeting of the Western Political Science Association in Portland, Oregon. (Available as Occasional Paper #9, Division of Governmental Studies and Services, Washington State University).
25.
LOVRICH, N. P. and M. NEIMAN (1984) Public Choice Theory in Public Administration: An Annotated Bibliography. New York: Garland.
26.
LOVRICH, N. P. and M. NEIMAN (1983) "Empirical studies in public choice theory as applied to public administration." Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 14, Chicago.
27.
MASTERMAN, M. (1967) "The nature of a paradigm," pp. 383-394 in M. Kochen (ed.) Growth of Knowledge. New York: John Wiley.
28.
MELTZER, H. and W. R. NORD [eds.] (1981) Making Organizations Humane and Productive: A Handbook for Practitioners. New York: John Wiley.
29.
OSTROM, E. (1983) "A public choice approach to metropolitan institutions: structure, incentives, and performance."Social Sci. J.20 (July): 79-96.
30.
OSTROM, E. (1976) "Size and performance in a federal system."Publius6 (Spring): 33-73.
31.
OSTROM, E. (1975a) "The design of institutional arrangements and the responsiveness of the police," in L. Rieselbach (ed.) People vs. Government: The Responsiveness of American Institutions. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.
32.
OSTROM, E. (1975b) "On righteousness, evidence, and reform: the police story."Urban Affairs Q.10 (June): 464-486.
33.
OSTROM, E. (1971) "Institutional arrangements and the measurement of policy consequences: applications to evaluating police performance."Urban Affairs Q.6 (June): 447-475.
34.
OSTROM, E. and R. PARKS (1978) "Policing: is there a system?" pp. 111-143 in J. V. May and A. B. Wildavsky (eds.) The Policy Cycle. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
35.
OSTROM, E. and G. WHITAKER (1977) Policing Metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
36.
OSTROM, E. and G. WHITAKER (1974) "Community control and government responsiveness: The case of police in black communities," pp. 303-334 in D. Rogers and W. Hawley (eds.) Improving the Quality of Urban Management. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
37.
OSTROM, V. (1973) Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration. University: Univ. of Alabama Press.
38.
OSTROM, V. and E. OSTROM (1971) "Public choice: a different approach to the study of public administration."Public Admin. Rev.24 (March/April): 203-212.
39.
PACHON H. P. and N. P. LOVRICH (1977) "The consolidation of urban public services: a focus on the police."Public Admin. Rev.37 (January/February): 38-47.
40.
POPPER, K. R. (1970) "Normal science and its dangers," pp. 51-58 in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
41.
PRESTHUS, R. (1978) The Organizational Society. New York: St. Martin's Press.
42.
ROGERS, B. and C. LIPSEY (1974) "Metropolitan reform: citizen evaluations of performance in Nashville-Davidson County Tennessee."Publius4 (Fall): 19-34.
43.
SALINGER, R. D. (1980) "Disincentives to effective employee training and development," pp. 378-392 in M. J. Levine (ed.) Public Personnel Management: Readings, Cases, and Contingency Plans. Salt Lake City: Brighton.
44.
SIMON, H. A. (1946) "The proverbs of administration."Public Admin. Rev.6 (Winter): 53-67.
45.
TIEBOUT, C. M. (1956) "A pure theory of local expenditure."J. of Pol. Econ.44 (October): 416-424.
46.
TOULMIN, S. E. (1970) "Does the distinction between normal and revolutionary science hold water?" pp. 39-47 in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
47.
TULLOCK, G. (1965) The Politics of Bureaucracy. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press.
48.
WALDO, D. (1980) The Enterprise of Public Administration: A Summary View. Novato, CA: Chandler & Sharp.
49.
WARREN, R. O. (1966) Government in Metropolitan Regions: A Reappraisal of Fractionated Political Organization. Davis, CA: Institute of Governmental Affairs, University of California.
50.
WILCOX, H. G. (1969) "Hierarchy, human nature, and the participative panacea."Public Admin. Rev.29 (January/February): 53-63.
51.
WILSON, J. Q. (1979) "The bureaucracy problem," in A. Saltzstein (ed.) Public Employees and Policymaking. Pacific Palisades: Palisades Publishing.
