This article attempts first to define idle administrative talk in terms of Speech-Act philosophy, then proceeds to illustrate the value of such an approach as a framework for the empirical study of idle talk in modern administration. Finally, the article concludes with two suggestions about why idle talk is so prominent in modern public and private sector administration. On the one hand, it may be a buffer device matched to the everyday ideological struggles occurring in complex organizations. On the other, its prominence may be due to the `fictional "nature of administrative work itself
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ARENDT, H. (1967) "Truth and Politics," in P. Laslett and W. G. Runciman (eds.) Philosophy, Politics and Society. New York: Barnes & Noble.
2.
AUSTIN, J. L. (1970) How To Do Things With Words. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press.
3.
BARTHES, R. (1977) Image, Music, Text. New York: Hill & Wang.
4.
BARTHES, R. (1967) Elements of Semiology. New York: Hill & Wang.
5.
BURKE, K. (1968) Languages as Symbiotic Action. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
6.
CALVOCORESSI, P. (1981) Top Secret Ultra. New York: Pantheon.
7.
CLEGG, I. (1979) The Theory of Power and Organization. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
8.
Department of Administration, Finance Division/Budget Office (1981) Instructions for the Preparation of the 1981-1982 Budget Request. Arizona: State of Arizona.
9.
Des Moines Register (1981) "Haig's Linguistically Approbated. " (November 21).
10.
Des Moines Register (1981) "How to Speak in `Appropriate Modes'." (August 19).
11.
FORESTER, J. (1980) "Listening: the social policy of everyday life (critical theory and Hermenentics in practice)."Social Praxis7(3/4): 219-232.
12.
GIDDENS, A. (1979) Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
13.
GURNEY, O. R. (1952) The Hittites. Baltimore: Pelican Originals.
14.
HABERMAS, J. (1979) "Comments on papers by Ekman and Goffman," in M. von Cranachet al. (eds.) Human Ethology. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
15.
HARE, R. M. (1972) Essays on the Moral Concepts. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
16.
HUMMEL, R. (1982) The Bureaucratic Experience. New York: St. Martin's.
17.
KERMODE, F. (1980) "Secrets and Narrative Sequence," in W.J.T. Mitchell (ed.) On Narrative. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
18.
LASSETER, V. (1981) "Why do spies use euphemisms? It's Maalox for their consciences."Des Moines Register: Section A. (December 23).
19.
MARCH, J. and H. A. SIMON (1958) Organizations. New York: John Wiley.
20.
NEWMAN, E. (1974) Strictly Speaking. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
21.
Office of State Planning and Budgeting (1979) Colorado Fiscal Note Manual. Denver: State of Colorado.
22.
ORTONY, A. [ed.] (1980) Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
23.
ORWELL, G. (1953) "Politics and the English Language." in A Collection of Essays by George Orwell. New York: Harbrace Paperbound Library.
24.
SAFIRE, W. (1978) Safire's Political Dictionary. New York: Random House.
25.
SEARLE, J. R. (1980) "Metaphor," in A. Ortoniy (ed.) Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge. Cambridge Univ. Press.
26.
SEARLE, J. R. (1979) Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
27.
SEARLE, J. R. (1970) Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
28.
WELLEK, R. and A. WARREN (1956) Theory of Literature. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
29.
WHITESIDE, T. (1978) Computer Capers. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
