From Weber to Ellul, the neglect of ethics and normative discourse in public organizational decision-making has been an enduring theme in bureaucratic theory. A number of contemporary public administration theorists have begun to search for a solution by turning to recent developments in ethics, political philosophy, jurisprudence, and the philosophy of science. An important theme in these efforts has been an attempt to present an alternative decision model capable of integrating both facts and values. As an extension of this line of investigation, the purpose of this article is to suggest a methodological framework for such a model developed from the informal logic of practical reason. Presented as a logic of questions that systematically integrate empirical and normative judgments, the framework is designed to serve as a rational-analytic guide for the evaluation of organizational decisions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ANDERSON, C. (1979) "The place of principles in policy analysis."Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.73 (September): 711-723.
2.
ANDERSON, C. (1978) "The logic of public problems: evaluation in comparative, policy research," pp. 19-41 in D. Ashford (ed.) Comparing Public Policies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3.
BAIER, K. (1958) The Moral Point of View. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.
4.
BARRY, B. (1979) Political Argument. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities.
5.
BARRY, B. and D. RAE (1975) "Political evaluation," pp. 337-401 in N. Polsby and F. Greenstein (eds.) The Handbook of Political Science. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
6.
BERNSTEIN, R. (1976) The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
7.
BERTALANFFY, L. (1968) General Systems Theory. New York: George Braziller.
8.
BROCK, B. , J. CHESEBRO, J. CRAGEN, and J. KLUMPP (1973) Public Policy Decision-Making: Systems Analysis and Comparative Advantages Debate. New York: Harper & Row.
9.
BROWN, P. (1976) "Ethics and policy research."Policy Analysis2 (Spring): 325-340.
10.
CAIN, G. and R. HOLLISTER (1972) "The methodology of evaluating social action programs," pp. 131-139 in P. Rossi and W. Williams (eds.) Evaluating Social Programs. New York: Seminar.
11.
CHURCHMAN, C. (1971) The Design of Inquiry Systems. New York: Basic Books.
12.
CHURCHMAN, C. and A. SCHAINBLATT (1969) "PPB: how can it be implemented?"Public Administration Rev.29 (March-April): 178-189.
13.
COHEN, D. and C. LINDBLOM (1979) "Solving problems of bureaucracy," pp. 125-138 in C. Weiss and A. Barton (eds.) Making Bureaucracies Work. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14.
DALLMAYR, F. (1976) "Beyond dogma and despair: toward a critical theory of politics."Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.70 (March): 64-79.
15.
DANKE, G. (1977) "Policy analysis as bureaucratic reform."Southern Rev. of Public Administration1 (Summer): 109-128.
16.
DIESING, P. (1962) Reason in Society. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press.
17.
DUNN, W. (1981) Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
18.
ELLUL, J. (1964) The Technological Society. New York: Knopf.
19.
EUBEN, P. J. (1981) "Philosophy and the professions."Democracy1 (April): 112-127. 112-127.
20.
FISCHER, F. (1980) Politics, Values, and Public Policy: The Problem of Methodology. Boulder, CO: Westview.
21.
FLEISHMAN, J. and B. PAYNE (1980) Ethical Dilemmas and the Education of Policy Makers. Hastings-on-Hudson, NY: Hastings Center.
22.
FORESTER, J. (1979) Questioning and Shaping Attention as Planning Strategy: Toward a Critical Theory of Planning. Department of City and Regional Planning, Working Paper 7. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
23.
FROHOCK, F. (1974) Normative Political Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
24.
HABERMAS, J. (1973) Legitimation Crisis. Boston: Beacon.
25.
HABERMAS, J. (1970) Toward a Rational Society. Boston: Beacon.
26.
HAMBRICK, R. (1974) "A guide for the analysis of policy arguments."Policy Sciences5 (December): 469-478.
27.
HART, D. (1974) "Social equity, justice, and the equitable administrator."Public Administration Rev.34 (January-February): 3-17.
28.
HART, D. and W. SCOTT (1979) Organizational America. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
29.
HART, D. and W. SCOTT (1973) "Administrative crisis: the neglect of metaphysical speculation."Public Administration Rev.33 (September-October): 415-422.
30.
HOUSE, E. (1980) Evaluating with Validity. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
31.
HUMMEL, R. (1977) The Bureaucratic Experience. New York: St. Martin's.
32.
JACOBY, H. (1976) The Bureaucratization of the World. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
33.
JOHNSON, R. (1975) "Research objectives for policy analysis," pp. 75-92 in K. Dolbeare (ed.) Public Policy Evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
34.
KLOSTERMAN, R. (1978) "Foundations for normative planning."J. of Amer. Institute of Planners44 (January): 37-46.
35.
KOLB, D. (1974) "On management and the learning process," pp. 27-42 in D. Kolb, I. Rubin, J. McIntyre (eds.) Organizational Psychology: A Book of Readings. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
36.
KRAMER, F. (1975) "Policy analysis as ideology."Public Administration Rev.36 (September-October): 509-517.
37.
KURTZ, P. (1965) Decision and the Condition of Man. New York: Dell.
38.
LASZLO, E. (1972) The Systems View of the World: The Natural Philosophy of the New Developments in the Sciences. New York: George Braziller.
39.
LEYS, W. (1952) Ethics for Policy Decisions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
40.
LILLA, M. (1981) "Ethos, ethics, and public service."Public Interest (Spring): 3-17.
41.
MacDONALD, M. (1956) "Natural rights," pp. 35-55 in P. Laslett (ed.) Politics, Philosophy and Society. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
42.
MacRAE, D. (1976) The Social Function of Social Science. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
43.
MARINI, E. [ed.] (1971) Toward a New Public Administration. Scranton, PA: Chandler.
44.
MASON, R. and I. MITROFF (1981) "Policy analysis as argument."Policy Studies J.9 (Special Issue, No. 2): 579-585.
45.
MEEHAN, E. (1973) "Science, values, and policies."Amer. Behavioral Scientist17 (September-October): 53-100.
46.
MEEHAN, E. (1967) Contemporary Political Thought. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
47.
MITROFF, I. and L. PONDY (1974) "On the organization of inquiry: a comparison of some radically different approaches to policy analysis."Public Administration Rev.34 (Spetember-October): 471-479.
48.
MOYNIHAN, D. [ed.] (1968) On Understanding Poverty. New York: Basic Books.
49.
PERRY, T. (1976) Moral Reasoning and Truth. Oxford: Clarendon.
50.
RAWLS, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
51.
REIN, M. (1976) Social Science and Public Policy. NY: Penguin.
52.
RIVLIN, A. (1973) "Forensic social science."Harvard Educ. Rev.13 (February): 61-75.
53.
ROHR, J. (1978) Ethics for Bureaucrats. New York: Dekker.
54.
ROHR, J. (1976) "The study of ethics in the p. a. curriculum."Public Administration Rev.36 (July-August): 398-406.
55.
SIMEY, T. (1968) Social Science and Social Purpose. London: Constable.
56.
TAYLOR, P. (1961) Normative Discourse. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
57.
TOULMIN, S. (1958) The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
58.
TOULMIN, S. (1950) An Examination of the Place of Reason in Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
59.
VON MISES, L. (1960) Epistemological Problems of Economics. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
60.
WALSH, D. (1973) "Sociology and the social world," pp. 15-35 in P. Filmeret al. (eds.) New Directions in Sociological Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.
61.
WEBER, M. (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Free Press.
62.
WEISSKOPF, W. (1971) Alienation and Economics. New York: Delta.
63.
WELDON, T. (1953) The Vocabulary of Politics. London: Penguin.
64.
WELLMAN, C. (1961) The Language of Ethics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
65.
WILDAVSKY, A. (1966) "The political economy of efficiency."Public Administration Rev.26 (November-December): 292-310.
66.
WILLIAMS, W. and J. EVANS (1972) "The politics of evaluation: the case of Head Start," pp. 249-269 in P. Rossi and W. Williams (eds.) Evaluating Social Programs. New York: Seminar.
