Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article cites a natural tension between citizen participation in public agencies and the drive for organizational stability. The power stability hypothesis, based on exchange theory, suggests that weaker organizations are more likely to offer citizens stronger roles in their planning processes. The article analyzes a survey of 394 citizen units in 193 planning and development agencies in Georgia. A standardized measure of the citizen-agency contract is developed. A panel of experts provides data on the level of power of host agencies. The central finding of the study is the inverse association between the level of agency power and strong citizen roles.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ARNSTEIN, S. R. (1969) "A ladder of citizen participation." Amer. Institute of Planners 35, 4: 216-224.

BLAU, P. (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley.

BLEIKER, H. (1978) Citizen Participation Handbook: For Public Officials and Other Professionals Serving the Public. Laramie, WY: Institute of Participatory Democracy.

CAHN, E. S. and B. A. PASSETT [eds.] (1971) Community Participation: Effecting Community Change. New York: Praeger.

GLASS, J., Jr. (1979) "Citizen participation in planning: the relationship between objectives and techniques." Assn. for Public Administration (May).

HAGE, J. and M. AIKEN (1970) Social Change in Complex Organizations. New York: Random House.

HOMANS, G. (1961) Social Behavior: As Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

LONG, N. (1958) "The community as an ecology of games." Amer. J. of Sociology 64.

MacNAIR, R. H. (1981) "Citizen participation as a balanced exchange: an analysis and strategy." J. of the Community Development Society 12, 1: 1-19.

10.

MacNAIR, R. H. 1976) "A locality-oriented public welfare agency: a case study of boundary maintenance in a hostile environment." J. of Sociology and Social Welfare 4, 1.

11.

MARSHALL, D. (1971) The Politics of Participation in Poverty. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.

12.

MAZMANIAN, D. (1976) "Participatory democracy in a federal agency," in H. Dickerson and J. Pierce (eds.) in Water Politics and Public Involvement. Ann Arbor: Ann Arbor Science.

13.

ROSENBAUM, W. A. (1975) "Slaying beautiful hypothesis with ugly fact: EPA and the limits of public participation," presented at the meeting of American Society for Public Administration Conference, Chicago.

14.

ROSENER, J. B. (1978) "Citizen participation: can we measure its effectiveness?" Public Administration Rev. (September/October).

15.

ROTH MAN, J. (1974) Planning and Organizing for Social Change. Action Principles from Social Science Research. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.

16.

SELZNICK, P. (1962) "Foundations of the theory of organizations," in A. Etzioni (ed.) Complex Organizations: A Sociological Reader. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

17.

SPEIGEL, H.B.C. [ed.] (1968) Citizen Participation in Urban Development: VIP Concepts and Issues. Vol. 11: Cases and Programs. Washington, DC: Institute for Applied Behavioral Science.

18.

TVA and the Grass Roots (1949) New York: Harper & Row.

19.

THIBAULT, J. W. and H. H. KELLY (1959) The Social Psychology of Groups. New York: John Wiley.

20.

VAN METER, E. C. (1975) "Citizen participation in the policy management process." Public Administration Rev. (special issue).

21.

WARREN, R. (1974) The Structure of Urban Reform. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.

22.

WARREN, R. (1963) The Community in America. Chicago: Rand McNally.

Citizen Participants in Public Bureaucracies

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References