The August issue of Administration & Society carried an article by M. Heper, C. L. Kim, and S. Par entitled " The Role of Bureaucracy and Regime Types: A Comparative Study of Turkish and South Korean Civil Servants." The present article criticizes these authors' interpretation of previous writings in comparative public administration and suggests reformations of the Heper-Kim-Pat hypotheses that will reconcile their data with earlier theoretical positions
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Esman, M. J. ( 1966) "The politics of development administration," in J. D. Montgomery and W. J. Siffin (eds.) Approaches to Development: Politics Administration and Change. New York: McGraw-Hill.
2.
Gable, R. W. and J. F. Springer (1976) Administering Agricultural Development in Asia: A Comparative Analysis of Four National Programs. Boulder, CO: Westview.
3.
Heady, F. (1966) Public Administration: A Comparative Perspective. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4.
Heper, M., C. L. Kim , and S.-T. Pai ( 1980) " The role of bureaucracy and regime types: A comparative study of Turkish and South Korean higher civil servants." Administration & Society12: 137-157.
5.
Kornberg, A. and L. D. Musolf [eds.] (1970) Legislatures in Developmental Perspective. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press.
6.
Milne, R. S. (1969) "Differentiation and administrative development " J. of Comparative Administration1, 2: 213-233.
7.
Riggs, F. W. (1980) "'Bureaucracy' is a shifty word." International Social Sci. J.
8.
——— (1970) "The context of development administration," in F. W Riggs, (ed.) Frontiers of Development Administration. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press.
9.
——— ( 1969) "Bureaucratic politics in comparative perspective ." J. of Comparative Administration1, 1: 5-38.
10.
——— (1966) Thailand: The Modernization of a Bureaucratic Polity . Honolulu: East-West Center .
11.
--- ( 1965) "The political context of administrative reform: relearning an old lesson." Public Administration Rev.25, 1: 70-79.
12.
--- ( 1964) Administration in Developing Countries: The Theory of Prismatic Society. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
13.
——— ( 1963) "Bureaucrats and political development: a paradoxical view," in J. LaPalombara (ed.) Bureaucracy and Political Development. Princeton, NJ. Pnnceton Univ. Press.
14.
Rourke, F. E. (1969) Bureaucracy, Politics, and Public Policy. Boston. Little, Brown.
15.
Siffin, W. J. ( 1957) "Toward the comparative study of public administration," pp. 1-22 in W. Siffin (ed.) Toward the Comparative Study of Public Administration . Bloomington, IN: Indiana Univ. Press.
