The Senior Executive Service (SES), the showcase of the Civil Service Reform Act, has been caught up in controversies on the degree to which it will "politicize" the higher reaches of the career civil service. This article argues that the creation of the SES represents a formal recognition of the higher civil service as an institution of government with significant normative consequences for those who hold these positions. Chief among these consequences is the extent to which SES personnel should welcome or resist political pressures. A method of integrating the ethical aspects of this question into management training programs is developed in this article.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barth, A.J. (1975) "Controlling the FBI." Washington Post (December 7).
2.
Freedman, J.O. (1978) Crisis and Legitimacy: The Administrative Process and American GovernmentNew York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
3.
Goldwin, R.A. (1977) "Of men and angels: a search for morality in the Constitution," pp. 1-18 in R. H. Horwitz (ed.) The Moral Foundations of the American Republic.Charlottesville: Univ. of Virginia Press.
4.
Heclo, H. (1977) A Government of Strangers: Executive Politics in WashingtonWashington, DC: Brookings .
5.
Lynn, N.B. and R.E. Vaden (1979) "Bureaucratic response to civil service reform."Public Administration Rev.39 (July-August): 333-343
6.
. President's Reorganization Project (1977) Personnel Management Project, Volume 1; Final Staff Report.Washington, DC : Government Printing Office.
7.
Public Administration Times (1979) Volume 2 (August 1).
8.
Rohr, J.A. (1978) Ethics for Bureaucrats: An Essay on Law and ValuesNew York: Dekker.
9.
Rosen, B. (1978) "Merit and the President's plan for changing the civil service system."Public Administration Review38 (July-August): 301-304
10.
. U.S. Senate (1978) Hearings Before the Committee on Governmental Affairs on S.2640, S.2707, S.2830. Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 and Reorganization Plan 2 of 1978. Washington, DC.
