Patterns of power and political processes within public agencies are poorly understood. From a political-economy perspective and based upon interview data, seven federal regulatory commissions are examined to ascertain the structure and foundations ofpower in them and salient characteristics of its mobilization and utilization. The analysis shows that contrary to common perceptions, the structure ofpower in the commissions is marked by substantial stability and integration in the position of chairman.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berner, R.O. (1976) Constraints on the Regulatory Process: A Case Study of Cable Television. Cambridge, MA. Ballinger.
2.
Cary, W. L. (1967) Politics and the Regulatory Agencies. New York: McGraw-Hill.
3.
Fiorino, D. J. and D. L. Metlay (1977) "Theories of agency failure, or, why regulatory agencies continue to be unreliable when the solutions seem so obvious." Presented at the 1977 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.
4.
Fritschler, A. L. (1969) Smoking and Politics: Policymaking and the Federal Bureaucracy. New York: Appleton.
5.
Karsnow, E. G. and L. D. Longley (1978) The Politics of Broadcast regulation . New York: St. Martin.
6.
Maisel, S. J. (1973) Managing the Dollar. New York: Norton.
7.
Nadel, M. V. (1971) The Politics of Consumer Protection. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
8.
Redford, E. S. (1969) The Regulatory Process: With Illustrations from Commercial Aviation. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.
9.
Wamsley, G. L. and M. N. Zald (1976) The Political Economy of Public Organizations : A Critique and Approach to the Study of Public Administration . Bloomington : Indiana Univ. Press .
10.
Welborn, D. M. (1977) Governance of Federal Regulatory Agencies. Knoxville : Univ. of Tennessee Press.
11.
——— (1966) "Presidents, regulatory commissioners and regulatory policy." J. of Public Law15, 3-29.
12.
Zald, M. N. [ed.] (1970) Power in Organizations. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt Univ. Press.
