Public administration is viewed here as facing a crisis of legitimacy which derives from (1) the field's association with societal tendencies toward regulation and control and (2) the failure ofpublic administration theory to adequately connect with adminis trative practice. In contrast, a critical approach to public administration is outlined, one which holds forth some promise of meaningful reflection and enlightened action in the public sector.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Appleby, P. (1945) Big Democracy . New York: Alfred E. Knopf.
2.
Aronowitz, S. (1972) "Introduction ." In M. Horkheimer Critical Theory. New York: Seabury Press.
3.
Bernstein, R. (1976) The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
4.
Farganis, J. ( 1975) "A preface to critical theory." Theory and Society2: 483-508.
5.
Habermas, J. (1974) "The public sphere: An encyclopedia article (1964)." New German Critique3: 49-55.
6.
——— (1970) Toward a Rational Society. Boston: Beacon Press.
7.
Horkheimer, M. (1974) Eclipse of Reason. New York: Seabury Press .
8.
——— (1972) Critical Theory. New York: Seabury Press.
9.
Jay, M. (1973) The Dialectical Imagination. Boston: Little, Brown .
10.
Long, N. (1962) The Polity. Chicago: Rand McNally.
11.
March, J. and H. A. Simon (1958) Organizations. New York: John Wiley.
12.
Marcuse, H. (1960) Reason and Revolution: Hegel and the Rise of Social Theory. Boston : Beacon Press.
13.
Pranger, R. J. (1968) The Eclipse of Citizenship. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
14.
Schroyer, T. (1973) The Critique of Domination. Boston: Beacon Press .
15.
Silverman, D. (1971) The Theory of Organizations. New York: Basic Books.
16.
Simon, H. A. (1957) Administrative Behavior. New York: Free Press.
17.
White, L. D. (1949) Introduction to the Study of Public Administration. New York: Macmillan.
18.
Wicker, T. (1975) A Time to Die. New York: Quadrangle Books.
