This paper is a response to an essay by Hart and Scott (1975) on the "organizational imperative." It critically evaluates the a priori propositions and rules of admmistrative behavior identified by Hart and Scott as being fundamental to this concept. It con cludes that: (1) the a priori propositions supporting the organizational imperative are invalid; (2) the rules of administrative behavior defined as essential to organizational health may, in fact, be deleterious to it; and (3) the assumption that U.S cultural values parallel those of the organizational imperative is an unwarranted oversimplifi cation of cultural trends.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alderson, W. (1950) "Survival and adjustment in organized behavior systems," pp. 65-87 in R. Cox and W. Alderson (eds.) Theory in Marketing. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
2.
Barnard, C.I. (1938) The Functions of an Executive. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
3.
Bennis, W.G. (1966) "The coming death of bureaucracy." THINK (November-December) : 30-35.
4.
Cartwright, D. (1965) "Influence, leadership, control," pp. 48-86 in J. G. March (ed.) Handbook of Organizations. Chicago: Rand McNally.
5.
Durant, W. and A. Durant (1968) The Lessons of History. NewYork: Simon & Schuster.
6.
Hart, D.K. and W.G. Scott (1975) "The organizational imperative." Administration and Society7 (November): 259-285.
7.
Kelley, H.H. and J.W. Thibaut ( 1969) "Group problem solving," pp. 29-101 in G. Lindsey and E. Aronson (eds.) The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 4. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
8.
McGregor, D. (1960) The Human Side of Enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
Reich, C.A. (1970) The Greening of America. New York: Random House.
10.
Revel, J. (1971) Without Marx and Jesus. New York: Dell.
11.
Rogers, C.R. and B.F. Skinner (1965) "Some answers concerning the control of human behavior: a symposium." Science124 (November 30): 1057-1066.
12.
Schumacher, E.F. (1973) Small is Beautiful. New York : Harper & Row.
