Rules of Evidence,Efficiency Claims,and Local Government Amalgamation

Abstract

Scholars have expressed frustration that public policy formulation sometimes proceeds with optimism that lies in stark contrast to the evaluation literature. We present theoretical insights from the rules of evidence that cast greater light on why this might be so. We also conduct novel sophisticated empirical analysis – based on a natural experiment in New South Wales, Australia – to better measure the efficiency outcomes at the heart of most amalgamation proposals. We conclude with our thoughts on the important normative measures, derived from rules of evidence, that might be operationalised to avoid injustice and enhance accountability in the future.

Keywords

local government amalgamation merger municipal government evidence efficiency

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aldag

A. M.

Warner

M. E.

Bel

(2020). It depends on what you share: The elusive cost savings from service sharing. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(2), 275–289.

Aristotle. (2012 [4th Century BCE]). The art of rhetoric. Collins Classics.

Bernardelli

Kortt

Dollery

(2020). Economies of scale and Brazilian local government Expenditure: Evidence from the State of Parana. Local Government Studies, 46(3), 436–458.

Blom-Hansen

Houlberg

Serritzlew

Treisman

(2016). Jurisdiction size and local government policy expenditure: Assessing the effect of municipal amalgamation. American Political Science Review, 110(4), 812–830.

Bovens

t’Hart

Peters

B. G.

(Eds.). (2001). Success and failure in public governance: A comparative analysis (new ed.). Edward Elgar.

Brandes

(1961). Evidence in Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Communications Monographs, 28(1), 21–28.

Butt

(2004). Butterworths concise Australian legal dictionary. LexisNexis.

Caldas

Ferreira

D. C.

Dollery

Marques

R. C.

(2019a). Are there scale economies in urban waste and wastewater municipal services? A non-radial input-oriented model applied to the Portuguese local government. Journal of Cleaner Production, 219, 531–539

Caldas

Ferreira

Dollery

Marques

(2019b). Economies of scope in Portuguese local government, 2008 to 2015. Regional Studies, 53(7), 963–976.

10.

Cherchye

Moesen

Rogge

Puyenbroeck

T. V.

(2007). An introduction to ‘benefit of the doubt’ composite indicators. Social Indicators Research, 82, 111–145.

11.

Coelli

Rao

O’Donnel

Battese

(2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Springer.

12.

Cooper

Seiford

Tone

(2007). Data envelopment analysis. Springer.

13.

Doumpos

Cohen

(2014). Applying data envelopment analysis on accounting data to assess and optimize the efficiency of Greek local governments. Omega, 46, 74–85.

14.

Drew

(2022). Saving local government. Springer.

15.

Drew

Grant

Fisher

(2017). Re-evaluating local government amalgamations: Utility maximisation meets the principle of double effect. Policy & Politics, 45(3), 379–394.

16.

Drew

Kortt

Dollery

(2015). No Aladdin’s Cave in New South Wales? Local Government amalgamation, scale economies and data envelopment specification. Administration & Society, 49(10), 1450–1470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399715581045

17.

Drew

McQuestin

Dollery

(2021). Did amalgamation make local government more fit for the future? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 81(2), 383–398.

18.

Drew

O’Flynn

Grant

(2018). Performing what? Exploring and expanding the notion of synecdoche in performance management practice. Public Administration Quarterly, 42(3), 395–424.

19.

Drew

Razin

Andrews

(2018). Rhetoric in municipal amalgamations: A comparative analysis. Local Government Studies, 45(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2018.1530657

20.

Fahey

Drew

Dollery

(2016). Merger myths: A functional analysis of economies of scale in new south wales municipalities. Public Finance and Management, 16(4), 362–382.

21.

Fleming

Rhodes

(2018). Can experience be evidence? Craft knowledge and evidence-based policing. Policy & Politics, 46(1), 3–26.

22.

Galizzi

Rota

Sicilia

(2023). Local government amalgamations: State of the art and new ways forward. Public Management Review, 25(12), 2428–2450.

23.

Gendzwill

Kurniewicz

Swianiewicz

(2021). The impact of municipal territorial reforms on the economic performance of local governments. A systematic review of quasi-experimental studies. Space and Polity, 25(1), 37–56.

24.

Glandville

Stuart

(2017). NSW council amalgamations scrapped after government backflip. ABC Online. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-07-27/council-amalgamations-scrapped-in-nsw-after-government-backflip/8748164

25.

Holcombe

Williams

(2009). Are there economies of scale in municipal government expenditures? Public Finance & Management, 9(3), 416–438.

26.

Howlett

(2012). The lessons of failure: Learning and blame avoidance in public policy-making. International Political Science Review, 33(5), 539–555.

27.

IPART (Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal). (2021). Special Variations & Minimum Rates 2021-22. https://www.ipart.nsw.gov.au/Home/Industries/Local-Government/Reviews/Special-Variations-Minimum-Rates/Special-Variations-Minimum-Rates-2021-22

28.

KPMG. (2016). Outline of financial modelling assumptions for local government merger proposals. https://pittwateralliance.weebly.com/uploads/3/2/0/8/32084059/2016-01-19_-_kpmg_financial_modelling_assumptions_for_council_merger_proposals.pdf

29.

Land and Environment Court. (2016). Oberon Council v Minister for Local Government; Cabonne Shire Council v Minister for Local Government; McAlister and Graham v Minister for Local Government.

30.

Lee

S. J.

Seo

J. H.

(2009). Jee bang haeng jung chye jae gye pyun ron [Restructuring Local Administration System]. Bobmunsa.

31.

Leleu

(2006). A linear programming framework for free disposal hull technologies and cost functions: Primal and dual models. European Journal of Operational Research, 168(2), 340–344.

32.

Lim

Lee

(2016). Free Disposal Hull (FDH) analysis for efficiency measurement: An update to DEA. The Stata Journal, 10(2), 1–8.

33.

McQuestin

Drew

Dollery

(2017). Do municipal mergers improve technical efficiency? An empirical analysis of the 2008 Queensland municipal merger program. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 77(3), 442–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12286

34.

McQuestin

Drew

Iboshi

(2021). The temporal dependence of public policy evaluation: The case of local government amalgamation. Local Government Studies, 49(5), 953–974. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2022.2039128

35.

Mora

Reggio

(2012). Treatment effect identification using alternative parallel assumptions. Stata.

36.

NSW Government. (2015). Local government reform: merger impacts and analysis.

37.

NSW Government. (2016, January). Merger proposal: Bathurst regional council Oberon council. https://www.olg.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/2026-03/proposed-merger-of-bathurst-regional-and-obern-councils.pdf

38.

Oukil

Nourani

Bencheikh

Soltani

A. A.

(2022). Using inverse data envelopment analysis to evaluate potential impact of mergers on energy use optimization-Application in the agricultural production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 381, Article 135199.

39.

Pawson

Tilley

(1997). Realistic evaluation. Sage Publications.

40.

Pew Research Centre. (2022). Key facts about recent trends in global migration. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2022/12/16/key-facts-about-recent-trends-in-global-migration/

41.

Pezet

(2021). Southern NSW Amalgamated councils denied request to reinstate old boundaries. ABC Online. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-07-20/amalgamated-communities-denied-request-to-reinstate-old-councils/100286542

42.

Reingewertz

(2012). Do municipal amalgamations work? Evidence from municipalities in Israel. Journal of Urban Economics, 72, 240–251.

43.

Sanderson

(2002). Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making. Public Administration, 80(1), 1–22.

44.

Simpson

Selden

(2003). When to welcome Greeks bearing gifts – Aristotle and the rules of evidence. Texas Technical Law Review, 34(4), 1009–1014.

45.

Tadros

(2021). NSW calls in KPMG, BCG, PwC, EY to create new agency. Australian Financial Review. https://www.afr.com/companies/professional-services/nsw-calls-in-kpmg-bcg-pwc-ey-to-create-new-agency-20211116-p599a2#:~:text=The%20NSW%20government%20has%20forked,multibillion%2Ddollar%20rail%20asset%20agency

46.

Tavares

(2018). Municipal amalgamations and their effects: A literature review. Miscellanea Geographica – Regional Studies on Development, 22(1), 5–15.

47.

Voda

Svacinova

(2020). To be central of peripheral? What matters for Political representation in Amalgamated Municipalities? Urban Affairs Review, 56(4), 1206–1236.

48.

Weiss

C. H.

(1990). Evaluation for decisions: Is anybody there? Does anybody care? In Alkin

M. C.

(Ed.), Debates on Evaluation (pp. 171–184). Sage.