Scholars have expressed frustration that public policy formulation sometimes proceeds with optimism that lies in stark contrast to the evaluation literature. We present theoretical insights from the rules of evidence that cast greater light on why this might be so. We also conduct novel sophisticated empirical analysis – based on a natural experiment in New South Wales, Australia – to better measure the efficiency outcomes at the heart of most amalgamation proposals. We conclude with our thoughts on the important normative measures, derived from rules of evidence, that might be operationalised to avoid injustice and enhance accountability in the future.
AldagA. M.WarnerM. E.BelG. (2020). It depends on what you share: The elusive cost savings from service sharing. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(2), 275–289.
2.
Aristotle. (2012 [4th Century BCE]). The art of rhetoric. Collins Classics.
3.
BernardelliL.KorttM.DolleryB. (2020). Economies of scale and Brazilian local government Expenditure: Evidence from the State of Parana. Local Government Studies, 46(3), 436–458.
4.
Blom-HansenJ.HoulbergK.SerritzlewS.TreismanD. (2016). Jurisdiction size and local government policy expenditure: Assessing the effect of municipal amalgamation. American Political Science Review, 110(4), 812–830.
5.
BovensM.t’HartP.PetersB. G. (Eds.). (2001). Success and failure in public governance: A comparative analysis (new ed.). Edward Elgar.
6.
BrandesP. (1961). Evidence in Aristotle’s Rhetoric. Communications Monographs, 28(1), 21–28.
7.
ButtP. (2004). Butterworths concise Australian legal dictionary. LexisNexis.
8.
CaldasP.FerreiraD. C.DolleryB.MarquesR. C. (2019a). Are there scale economies in urban waste and wastewater municipal services? A non-radial input-oriented model applied to the Portuguese local government. Journal of Cleaner Production, 219, 531–539
9.
CaldasP.FerreiraD.DolleryB.MarquesR. (2019b). Economies of scope in Portuguese local government, 2008 to 2015. Regional Studies, 53(7), 963–976.
10.
CherchyeL.MoesenW.RoggeN.PuyenbroeckT. V. (2007). An introduction to ‘benefit of the doubt’ composite indicators. Social Indicators Research, 82, 111–145.
11.
CoelliT.RaoD.O’DonnelC.BatteseG. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Springer.
12.
CooperW.SeifordL.ToneK. (2007). Data envelopment analysis. Springer.
13.
DoumposM.CohenS. (2014). Applying data envelopment analysis on accounting data to assess and optimize the efficiency of Greek local governments. Omega, 46, 74–85.
14.
DrewJ. (2022). Saving local government. Springer.
15.
DrewJ.GrantB.FisherJ. (2017). Re-evaluating local government amalgamations: Utility maximisation meets the principle of double effect. Policy & Politics, 45(3), 379–394.
16.
DrewJ.KorttM.DolleryB. (2015). No Aladdin’s Cave in New South Wales? Local Government amalgamation, scale economies and data envelopment specification. Administration & Society, 49(10), 1450–1470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399715581045
17.
DrewJ.McQuestinD.DolleryB. (2021). Did amalgamation make local government more fit for the future?Australian Journal of Public Administration, 81(2), 383–398.
18.
DrewJ.O’FlynnJ.GrantB. (2018). Performing what? Exploring and expanding the notion of synecdoche in performance management practice. Public Administration Quarterly, 42(3), 395–424.
FaheyG.DrewJ.DolleryB. (2016). Merger myths: A functional analysis of economies of scale in new south wales municipalities. Public Finance and Management, 16(4), 362–382.
21.
FlemingJ.RhodesR. (2018). Can experience be evidence? Craft knowledge and evidence-based policing. Policy & Politics, 46(1), 3–26.
22.
GalizziG.RotaS.SiciliaM. (2023). Local government amalgamations: State of the art and new ways forward. Public Management Review, 25(12), 2428–2450.
23.
GendzwillA.KurniewiczA.SwianiewiczP. (2021). The impact of municipal territorial reforms on the economic performance of local governments. A systematic review of quasi-experimental studies. Space and Polity, 25(1), 37–56.
HolcombeR.WilliamsD. (2009). Are there economies of scale in municipal government expenditures?Public Finance & Management, 9(3), 416–438.
26.
HowlettM. (2012). The lessons of failure: Learning and blame avoidance in public policy-making. International Political Science Review, 33(5), 539–555.
Land and Environment Court. (2016). Oberon Council v Minister for Local Government; Cabonne Shire Council v Minister for Local Government; McAlister and Graham v Minister for Local Government.
30.
LeeS. J.SeoJ. H. (2009). Jee bang haeng jung chye jae gye pyun ron [Restructuring Local Administration System]. Bobmunsa.
31.
LeleuH. (2006). A linear programming framework for free disposal hull technologies and cost functions: Primal and dual models. European Journal of Operational Research, 168(2), 340–344.
32.
LimB.LeeK.LeeC. (2016). Free Disposal Hull (FDH) analysis for efficiency measurement: An update to DEA. The Stata Journal, 10(2), 1–8.
33.
McQuestinD.DrewJ.DolleryB. (2017). Do municipal mergers improve technical efficiency? An empirical analysis of the 2008 Queensland municipal merger program. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 77(3), 442–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12286
34.
McQuestinD.DrewJ.IboshiH. (2021). The temporal dependence of public policy evaluation: The case of local government amalgamation. Local Government Studies, 49(5), 953–974. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2022.2039128
35.
MoraR.ReggioI. (2012). Treatment effect identification using alternative parallel assumptions. Stata.
36.
NSW Government. (2015). Local government reform: merger impacts and analysis.
OukilA.NouraniA.BencheikhA.SoltaniA. A. (2022). Using inverse data envelopment analysis to evaluate potential impact of mergers on energy use optimization-Application in the agricultural production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 381, Article 135199.
TavaresA. (2018). Municipal amalgamations and their effects: A literature review. Miscellanea Geographica – Regional Studies on Development, 22(1), 5–15.
47.
VodaP.SvacinovaP. (2020). To be central of peripheral? What matters for Political representation in Amalgamated Municipalities?Urban Affairs Review, 56(4), 1206–1236.
48.
WeissC. H. (1990). Evaluation for decisions: Is anybody there? Does anybody care? In AlkinM. C. (Ed.), Debates on Evaluation (pp. 171–184). Sage.
