This article examines whether the level of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure in Andalusian municipal-owned enterprises varies by two attributes: industry and the local government that owns the company. To do this, the authors conduct a content analysis of multiple communication channels of 307 MOEs using a validated instrument. Consistent with our initial expectation, we find that ESG disclosure among Andalusian MOEs tends to be isomorphic across firms operating in the same sector and those owned by the same local government. Our follow-up analysis has allowed us to identify alternative explanations for the higher levels of voluntary rather than mandatory disclosure among Andalusian MOEs. Companies that engage in greater voluntary ESG disclosure evidently are driven more by normative than coercive forces.
AdamsC. A.LarrinagaC. (2019). Progress: Engaging with organisations in pursuit of improved sustainability accounting and performance. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(8), 2367–2394. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-03-2018-3399
2.
AertsW.CormierD.MagnanM. (2006). Intra-industry imitation in corporate environmental reporting: An international perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25(3), 299–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2006.03.004
3.
Al-MoharebM.Gutiérrez PonceH.Chamizo GonzálezJ. (2025). Factors affecting the quality of accounting disclosures provided in the annual reports for Jordanian firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32, 1444–1456. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3025
4.
AndradesJ.LarranM. (2019). Examining the amount of mandatory non-financial information disclosed by Spanish state-owned enterprises and its potential influential variables. Meditari Accountancy Research, 27(4), 534–555. https://doi.org/10.1108/medar-05-2018-0343
5.
AndradesJ.Martinez-MartinezD.LarranM.HerreraJ. (2019). Online information disclosure in Spanish municipal-owned enterprises: A study based on the compliance with transparency requirements. Online Information Review, 43(5), 922–944. https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-02-2018-0063
6.
AndradesJ.Muriel de Los ReyesM. J.JorgeM. L. (2023). How far can mandatory requirements drive increased levels of disclosure?Public Money & Management, 43(8), 793–801. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2022.2045124
7.
AndradesJ.Martinez-MartinezD.HerreraJ.LarranM. (2024). Is water management really transparent? A comparative analysis of ESG reporting of Andalusian publicly-owned enterprises. Public Money & Management, 44(3), 208–215.
8.
ArchelP.HusillosJ. (2009). Últimos desarrollos sobre RSE en España:¿ un avance hacia la sostenibilidad?. Last developments about CSR in Spain: An advance to sustainability?CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, 65, 59–84.
9.
ArgentoD.GrossiG.PerssonK.VingrenT. (2019). Sustainability disclosures of hybrid organizations: Swedish state-owned enterprises. Meditari Accountancy Research, 27(4), 505–533. https://doi.org/10.1108/medar-07-2018-0362
BebbingtonJ.HigginsC.FrameB. (2009). Initiating sustainable development reporting: Evidence from New Zealand. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22(4), 588–625. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570910955452
12.
BebbingtonJ.KirkE. A.LarrinagaC. (2012). The production of normativity: A comparison of reporting regimes in Spain and the UK. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(2), 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2012.01.001
13.
BebbingtonJ.UnermanJ. (2020). Advancing research into accounting and the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(7), 1657–1670. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-05-2020-4556
14.
CabelloJ. M.Navarro-JuradoE.Thiel-EllulD.Rodríguez-DíazB.RuizF. (2021). Assessing environmental sustainability by the double reference point methodology: the case of the provinces of Andalusia (Spain). International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 28(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1778582
15.
CarpenterV. L.FerozE. H. (2001). Institutional theory and accounting rule choice: An analysis of four US state governments’ decisions to adopt generally accepted accounting principles. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(7–8), 565–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0361-3682(00)00038-6
16.
CollinS. O. Y.TagessonT.AnderssonA.CatoJ.HanssonK. (2009). Explaining the choice of accounting standards in municipal corporations: Positive accounting theory and institutional theory as competitive or concurrent theories. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20(2), 141–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2008.09.003
17.
De KlerkM.de VilliersC.van StadenC. (2015). The influence of corporate social responsibility disclosure on share prices: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Pacific Accounting Review, 27(2), 208–228. https://doi.org/10.1108/par-05-2013-0047
18.
de VilliersC.AlexanderD. (2014). The institutionalisation of corporate social responsibility reporting. British Accounting Review, 46(2), 198–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.03.001
19.
de VilliersC.LowM.SamkinG. (2014). The institutionalisation of mining company sustainability disclosures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.089
20.
DicoratoS. L.Di GerioC.FioraniG.PaciulloG. (2020). Integrated reporting in municipally owned corporations: A case study in Italy. In Manes-RossiF.Levy OrelliR. (Eds.), New trends in public sector reporting: Integrated reporting and beyond (pp. 175–194). Public Sector Financial Management.
21.
DienesD.SassenR.FischerJ. (2016). What are the drivers of sustainability reporting? A systematic review. Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal, 7(2), 154–189. https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-08-2014-0050
22.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
23.
DonatellaP. (2020). Determinants of mandatory disclosure compliance in Swedish municipalities. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 32(2), 247–365. https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbafm-03-2019-0048
EitremA.MeidellA.ModellS. (2024). The use of institutional theory in social and environmental accounting research: A critical review. Accounting and Business Research, 54(7), 775–810.
26.
GardeR.RodriguezM. P.LopezA. M. (2017). Corporate and managerial characteristics as drivers of social responsibility disclosure by state-owned enterprises. Review of Managerial Science, 11(3), 633–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0199-7
27.
GiacominiD.ZolaP.ParediD.MazzoleniM. (2020). Environmental disclosure and stakeholder engagement via social media: State of the art and potential in public utilities. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4), 1552–1564. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1904
28.
GreilingD.GrübB. (2014). Sustainability reporting in Austrian and German local public enterprises. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 17(3), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2014.909315
29.
GrossiG.PapenfußU.TremblayM. S. (2015). Corporate governance and accountability of state-owned enterprises. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(4/5), 274–285. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpsm-09-2015-0166
30.
GrossiG.VakkuriJ.SargiacomoM. (2022). Accounting, performance and accountability challenges in hybrid organisations: A value creation perspective. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(3), 577–597. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-10-2021-5503
31.
Gutiérrez-PonceH.Chamizo-GonzálezJ.Arimany-SerratN. (2021). Spanish companies’ website communication of environmental, social, and governance information. Communication & Society, 34(4), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.34.4.117-133
32.
Gutiérrez-PonceH.Chamizo-GonzálezJ.Arimany-SerratN. (2022). Disclosure of environmental, social, and corporate governance information by Spanish companies: A compliance analysis. Sustainability, 14, 3254. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063254
33.
Gutiérrez-PonceH. (2023). Sustainability as a strategy base in Spanish firms: Sustainability reports and performance on the sustainable development goals. Sustainable Development, 31(4), 3008–3023. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2566
34.
HaraldssonM.TagessonT. (2014). Compromise and avoidance: The response to new legislation. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 10(3), 288–313. https://doi.org/10.1108/jaoc-10-2012-0096
35.
HigginsC.LarrinagaC. (2014). Sustainability reporting: Insights from institutional theory. In BebbingtonJ.UnermanJ.O’DwyerB. (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability (2nd ed., pp. 273–285). Routledge.
36.
HigginsC.StubbsW.MilneM. (2018). Is sustainability reporting becoming institutionalised? The role of an issues-based field. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(2), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2931-7
37.
ImperialeF.PizziS.LippolisS. (2023). Sustainability reporting and ESG performance in the utilities sector. Utilities Policy, 80, 101468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2022.101468
38.
KrippendorfK. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage.
39.
LarrinagaC.BebbingtonJ. (2021). The pre-history of sustainability reporting: A constructivist reading. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(9), 162–181. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-03-2017-2872
40.
LarrinagaC.Luque-VilchezM.FernándezR. (2018). Sustainability accounting regulation in Spanish public sector organizations. Public Money & Management, 38(5), 345–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2018.1477669
41.
Larrinaga-GonzélezC.Pérez-ChamorroV. (2008). Sustainability accounting and accountability in public water companies. Public Money & Management, 28(6), 337–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2008.00667.x
42.
LigorioL.CaputoF.VenturelliA. (2022). Sustainability disclosure and reporting by municipally owned water utilities. Utilities Policy, 77, 101382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2022.101382
43.
Luque-VílchezM.HusillosJ.LarrinagaC. (2024). The construction of the normative persuasion of social and environmental reporting regulation. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 15(7), 34–62.
44.
Luque-VílchezM.LarrinagaC. (2016). Reporting models do not translate well: Failing to regulate CSR reporting in Spain. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 36(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160x.2016.1149301
45.
Manes-RossiF.NicolòG.Tiron TudorA.ZanellatoG. (2021). Drivers of integrated reporting by state-owned enterprises in Europe: A longitudinal analysis. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(3), 586–616. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-07-2019-0532
46.
MarquisC.QianC. (2014). Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: Symbol or substance?Organization Science, 25(1), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0837
47.
MontecalvoM.FarnetiF.de VilliersC. (2018). The potential of integrated reporting to enhance sustainability reporting in the public sector. Public Money & Management, 38(5), 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2018.1477675
48.
NicoloG.ZanellatoG.Manes-RossiF.Tiron-TudorA. (2021). Corporate reporting metamorphosis: empirical findings from state-owned enterprises. Public Money & Management, 41(2), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1719633
PattenD. M.RenY.ZhaoN. (2015). Standalone corporate social responsibility reporting in China: An exploratory analysis of its relation to legitimation. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 35(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160x.2015.1007467
51.
PosadasS. C.Ruiz-BlancoS.Fernandez-FeijooB.TarquinioL. (2023). Institutional isomorphism under the test of non-financial reporting directive. Evidence from Italy and Spain. Meditari Accountancy Research, 31(7), 26–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/medar-02-2022-1606
52.
ReverteC. (2015). The new Spanish corporate social responsibility strategy 2014–2020: A crucial step forward with new challenges ahead’. Journal of Cleaner Production, 91, 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.041
53.
RoyoS.YetanoA.García-LacalleJ. (2019). Accountability styles in state-owned enterprises: The good, the bad, the ugly. . .and the pretty. Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review, 22(2), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.6018/rcsar.382231
54.
Ruiz-LozanoM.Navarro-GaleraA.Tirado-ValenciaP.De Los Ríos-BerjillosA. (2019). Can the cultural environment affect governmental transparency on sustainability? Useful measures for policy makers and practitioners. Local Government Studies, 45(4), 481–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2018.1560271
55.
ScottW. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Sage.
56.
TestaM. (2024). Non-financial reporting by utilities: A structured literature review. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Accepted manuscript.
57.
TorresL.RipollL.PinaV.BachillerP. (2024). Sustainability reporting from the preparers’ perspective in locally-owned public enterprises. Public Money & Management, 44(8), 696–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2024.2392724
58.
ValenzaG.DamianoR. (2023). Sustainability reporting and public value: Evidence from port authorities. Utilities Policy, 81, 101508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2023.101508
59.
VinnariE.LaineM. (2013). Just a passing fad?: The diffusion and decline of environmental reporting in the Finnish water sector. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(7), 1107–1134. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2012-01002
60.
WootenM.HoffmanA. J. (2017). Organizational fields: Past, present and future. In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Vol. 2, pp. 55–74). http://ssrn.com/abstract=2767550Sage Publishing, NY (USA).
61.
YetanoA.SorrentinoD. (2023). Accountability disclosure of SOEs: comparing hybrid and private European news agencies. Meditari Accountancy Research, 31(2), 294–319. https://doi.org/10.1108/medar-04-2020-0873
62.
YoungS.MaraisM. (2012). A multi-level perspective of CSR reporting: The implications of national institutions and industry risk characteristics. Corporate Governance, 20(5), 432–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2012.00926.x
63.
ZappM.PowellJ. J. W. (2016). How to construct an organizational field: Empirical educational research in Germany, 1995–2015. European Educational Research Journal, 15(5), 537–557. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116641422
64.
ZhaoN.PattenD. M. (2016). An exploratory analysis of managerial perceptions of social and environmental reporting in China. Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal, 7(1), 80–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-10-2014-0063
