This study examines the effect on a municipality’s traffic police of using a Telegram channel as a community information service. Applying Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to 388 users of the traffic police Telegram channel, the findings reveal that citizens’ satisfaction with the Telegram channel is positively associated with their trust and overall satisfaction with the Traffic Police. This trust and satisfaction in turn enhance the perceived external prestige of the police. The study also outlines theoretical, managerial, and political implications, and concludes with a discussion of limitations and future research opportunities.
AgostinoD.ArnaboldiM. (2016). A measurement framework for assessing the contribution of social media to public engagement: An empirical analysis on Facebook. Public Management Review, 18(9), 1289–1307.
2.
AibinuA. A.Al-LawatiA. M. (2010). Using PLS-SEM technique to model construction organizations’ willingness to participate in e-bidding. Automation in Construction, 19, 714–724.
3.
AlfordJ.HughesO. (2008). Public value pragmatism as the next phase of public management. The American Review of Public Administration, 38(2), 130–148.
4.
AlfordJ.O’FlynnJ. (2009). Making sense of public value: Concepts, critiques and emergent meanings. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3–4), 171–191.
5.
Al-YazidiS.BerriJ.Al-QurishiM.Al-AlrubaianM. (2020). Measuring reputation and influence in online social networks: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 8, 105824–105851.
6.
ArayankalamJ.KhanA.KrishnanS. (2021). How to deal with corruption? Examining the roles of e-government maturity, government administrative effectiveness, and virtual social networks diffusion. International Journal of Information Management, 58, 102203.
7.
BergamiM.BagozziR. P. (2000). Self-categorization, affective commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4), 555–577.
8.
BlasiS.GobboE.SeditaS. R. (2022). Smart cities and citizen engagement: Evidence from Twitter data analysis on Italian municipalities. Journal of Urban Management, 11(2), 153–165.
9.
BlindP. K. (2007, June). Building trust in government in the twenty-first century: Review of literature and emerging issues [Conference session]. 7th Global Forum on Reinventing Government Building Trust in Government (Vol. 2007, pp. 26–29). UNDESA.
10.
BonsónE.RoyoS.RatkaiM. (2017). Facebook practices in Western European municipalities: An empirical analysis of activity and citizens’ engagement. Administration & Society, 49(3), 320–347.
11.
BouckaertG. (2012). Trust and public administration. Administration, 60(1), 91–115.
12.
BozemanB. (2002). Public-value failure: When efficient markets may not do. Public Administration Review, 62(2), 145–161.
13.
BradfordB.JacksonJ.StankoE. A. (2009). Contact and confidence: Revisiting the impact of public encounters with the police. Policing & Society, 19(1), 20–46.
14.
BrownT. (2007). Coercion versus choice: Citizen evaluations of public service quality across methods of consumption. Public Administration Review, 67(3), 559–572.
15.
CamõesP. J.MendesS. M. (2019). Do citizens trust the civil service differently? Comparing the determinants of confidence in political-administrative institutions. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(14), 1234–1244.
16.
CardulloP.KitchinR. (2019). Being a “citizen” in the smart city: Up and down the scaffold of smart citizen participation in Dublin, Ireland. GeoJournal, 84(1), 1–13.
CheemaG. S.PopovskiV. (Eds.) (2010). Building trust in government: Innovations in governance reform in Asia. United Nations University Press.
19.
ChengH. (2015). Factors influencing public satisfaction with the local police: A study in Saskatoon, Canada. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 38(4), 690–704.
20.
CheurprakobkitS.BartschR. A. (2001). Police performance: A model for assessing citizens’ satisfaction and the importance of police attributes. Police Quarterly, 4(4), 449–468.
21.
ChristensenT.LodgeM. (2018). Reputation management in societal security—A comparative study. American Review of Public Administration, 48(2), 119–132.
22.
CiftciogluA. (2010). The relationship between perceived external prestige and turnover intention: An empirical investigation. Corporate Reputation Review, 13, 248–263.
23.
CriadoJ. I.VillodreJ. (2021). Delivering public services through social media in European local governments. An interpretative framework using semantic algorithms. Local Government Studies, 47(2), 253–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2020.1729750
24.
CronbachL. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.
25.
DenhardtJ. V.DenhardtR. B. (2011). The new public service: Serving, not steering (3rd ed.). M. E. Sharpe.
26.
DenhardtJ. V.DenhardtR. B. (2015). The new public service revisited. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 664–672.
27.
de VriesH.BekkersV. J. J. M.TummersL. G. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146–166.
28.
DuttonJ. E.DukerichJ. M.HarquailC. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239–263.
29.
EllisonN. B.SteinfieldC.LampeC. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168.
30.
EspositoP.RicciP. (2015). How to turn public (dis) value into new public value? Evidence from Italy. Public Money & Management, 35(3), 227–231.
31.
FeeneyM. K.WelchE. W. (2012). Electronic participation technologies and perceived outcomes for local government managers. Public Management Review, 14(6), 815–833.
32.
FieldT.MullerE.LauE. (2003). The e-government imperative. OECD Publishing.
33.
FoleyP.AlfonsoX. (2009). Egovernment and the transformation agenda. Public Administration, 87(2), 371–396.
34.
GaoX. (2017). Networked Co-Production of 311 services: Investigating the use of Twitter in five U.S. cities. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(9), 712–724. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1298126
35.
GongY.JanssenM. (2012). From policy implementation to business process management: Principles for creating flexibility and agility. Government Information Quarterly, 29(l. 1), S61–S71.
36.
GuessA.MungerK.NaglerJ.TuckerJ. (2019). How accurate are survey responses on social media and politics?Political Communication, 36(2), 241–258.
37.
HarrisonJ.RouseP.de VilliersC. (2012). Accountability and performance measurement: A stakeholder perspective.
Journal of Centrum Cathedra: The Business and Economics Research Journal, 5(2), 243–258.
38.
HarveyK. (2013). Encyclopedia of social media and politics. Sage Publications Inc.
39.
HenselerJ.RingleC. M.SarstedtM. (2014). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–121.
40.
HenselerJ.SarstedtM. (2013). Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling. Computational Statistics, 28(2), 565–580.
41.
Hernández-GarridoR.PereaD.Pérez-CalañasC. (2022). The vision of the main mobile apps related to caravanning: An analysis of the reviews focusing on users and developers. Journal of Tourism and Services, 13(24), 1–25.
42.
HofmannS.BeverungenD.RäckersM.BeckerJ. (2013). What makes local governments’ online communications successful? Insights from a multi-method analysis of Facebook. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 387–396.
43.
HoM. H. W.ChungH. F. L. (2020). Customer engagement, customer equity and repurchase intention in mobile apps. Journal of Business Research, 121, 13–21.
44.
HuX.RodgersK.LovrichN. P. (2018). “We are more than crime fighters”: Social media images of police departments. Police Quarterly, 21(4), 544–572.
45.
IacobucciD. (2009). Structural equations modeling: Fit indices, sample size, and advanced topics. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20, 90–98.
46.
IntraviaJ.ThompsonA. J.PickettJ. T. (2020). Net legitimacy: Internet and social media exposure and attitudes toward the police. Sociological Spectrum, 40(1), 58–80.
47.
JoinsonA. N. (2008, April). Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people? Motives and use of Facebook [Conference session]. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1027–1036).
48.
KamolovS. G.SmaginaA. A. (2020). Digital innovation technologies in public governance: Budget geolocation system. In PopkovaE.SergiB. (Eds.), Scientific and technical revolution: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. ISC 2019, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (Vol. 129, pp. 467–475). Springer.
49.
KawabataM. K.CamargoA. S. (2023). E-government innovation initiatives in public administration: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Administration & Society, 55(9), 1758–1790.
50.
KellyJ. M.SwindellD. (2002). A multiple–indicator approach to municipal service evaluation: Correlating performance measurement and citizen satisfaction across jurisdictions. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 610–621.
51.
KrollA.MoynihanD. P. (2015). Does training matter? Evidence from performance management reforms. Public Administration Review, 75(3), 411–420.
52.
LeeM.JeongM.LeeJ. (2017). Roles of negative emotions in customers’ perceived helpfulness of hotel reviews on a user-generated review website: A text mining approach. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(2), 762–783.
53.
LindersD. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 446–454.
54.
LoehlinJ. C. (1998). Latent variables models: An introduction to factor, path and structural analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
55.
LuI. R. R.KwanE.ThomasD. R.CedzynskiM. (2011). Two new methods for estimating structural equation models: An illustration and a comparison with two established methods. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28(3), 258–268.
56.
Luna-ReyesL. F.Picazo-VelaS.LunaD. E.Gil-GarciaJ. R. (2016, March). Creating public value through digital government: Lessons on inter-organizational collaboration and information technologies [Conference session]. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 2840–2849).
57.
MaL. (2013). The diffusion of government microblogging. Evidence from Chinese municipal police bureaus. Public Management Review, 15(2), 274–309.
58.
MartínS.CamareroC.San JoséR. (2011). Does involvement matter in online shopping satisfaction and trust?Psychology & Marketing, 28(2), 145–167.
59.
MeynhardtT. (2009). Public value inside: What is public value creation?International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3–4), 192–219.
60.
MeynhardtT. (2021). Public value is knowable, public value creation is not. Administration & Society, 53(10), 1631–1642.
61.
MišicK. U.PodnarK. (2019). Perception of city management, fellow residents, and perceived external prestige (PEP) as antecedents of city affective commitment-The city marketing perspective. Cities, 84, 66–74.
62.
MooreM. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in Government. The President and Fellows of Harvard College.
63.
MooreM. H. (2015). Creating a public value account and scorecard. Public Value and Public Administration, 53, 110–130.
64.
MurphyK.MazerolleL.BennettS. (2014). Promoting trust in police: Findings from a randomised experimental field trial of procedural justice policing. Policing & Society, 24(4), 405–424.
65.
NorrisD. F.ReddickC. G. (2013). Local E-Government in the United States: Transformational or incremental change?Public Administration Review, 73(1), 165–175.
66.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Phychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
67.
OhY.ShinH.ParkJ. (2022). Exploring managerial attitudes toward various participation mechanisms in response to citizen satisfaction signals on public service quality. Administration & Society, 54(5), 878–902.
68.
OrrM.WestD. M. (2007). Citizen evaluations of local police. Personal experience or symbolic attitudes?Administration & Society, 38(6), 649–668.
69.
OsborneS. (2010). The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. Routledge.
70.
PanagiotopoulosP.BigdeliA. Z.SamsS. (2014). Citizen–government collaboration on social media: The case of Twitter in the 2011 riots in England. Government Information Quarterly, 31(3), 349–357.
71.
ParkerK. D.OnyekwulujeA. B.MurtyK. S. (1995). African Americans’ attitudes toward the local police: A multivariate analysis. Journal of Black Studies, 25(3), 396–409.
72.
PortalS.AbrattR.BendixenM. (2018). Building a human brand: Brand anthropomorphism unravelled. Business Horizons, 61(3), 367–374.
73.
PrebbleM. (2021). Public Value is unknowable; public authority makes every government decision a wicked problem. Administration & Society, 53(10), 1582–1602.
74.
PryceD. K. (2018). Does procedural justice influence general satisfaction with police? A study from a hard-to-reach population of immigrants in the United States. Journal of Crime and Justice, 41(1), 31–48.
75.
RadziA. R.RahmanR. A.AlmutairiS. (2022). Modeling COVID-19 impacts and response strategies in the construction industry: PLS–SEM approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 5326.
76.
RennO.WeblerT.WiedemannP. (Eds.). (1995). Fairness and competence in citizen participation. Kluwer.
77.
SæbøØ.RoseJ.FlakL. S. (2008). The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly, 25(3), 400–428.
78.
SahinN.BragaA. A.ApelR.BrunsonR. K. (2017). The impact of procedurally-just policing on citizen perceptions of police during traffic stops: The Adana randomized controlled trial. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33(4), 701–726.
79.
ShafiqM. A.KhanM. M. A.GulR.HussainM.JavaidM. Q. (2023). Influence of social media marketing in development of customer trust and satisfaction through the moderating role of electronic word of mouth. Journal of Social Sciences Review, 3(1), 623–638.
80.
SmidtsA.PruynA. T. H.Van RielC. B. M. (2001). The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 1051–1062.
81.
SoeR. M.DrechslerW. (2018). Agile local governments: Experimentation before implementation. Government Information Quarterly, 35, 323–335.
82.
SongC.LeeJ. (2016). Citizens’ use of social media in government, perceived transparency, and trust in government. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(2), 430–453.
83.
TylerT. R.HuoY. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. Russell Sage Foundation.
84.
WaheduzzamanW.As-SaberS.HamidM. B. (2018). Elite capture of local participatory governance. Policy & Politics, 46(4), 645–662.
85.
WoldH. (1982). Soft modeling: The basic design and some extensions. In JoreskogK. G.WoldH. (Eds.), Systems under indirect observation, Part II (pp. 1–54). North-Holland.
86.
YangK. (2006). Trust and citizen involvement decisions: Trust in citizens, trust in institutions, and propensity to trust. Administration & Society, 38(5), 573–595.
87.
YehH. (2017). The effects of successful ICT-based smart city services: From citizens’ perspectives. Government Information Quarterly, 34(3), 556–565.
88.
YildizM. (2007). E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly, 24(3), 646–665.
89.
YousafM.IhsanF.EllahiA. (2016). Exploring the impact of good governance on citizens’ trust in Pakistan. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 200–209.
