To understand the effects of bidder’s strategies on contractual modifications, this study utilized econometric methods and a database containing 5,434 engineering service contracts from Brazilian federal government. The results demonstrate the effects arising from the trade-off between the low prices presented in the contractor selection phase and the contractual performance measured by contract modifications. Competition among bidders in a reverse auction with multiple rounds of bid submissions can exacerbate this trade-off, potentially incentivizing risk-taking strategies by bidders. Subsequently, this may lead to the need for contract modifications to facilitate the ongoing execution of the contract.
AlbanoG. L.CesiB.IozziA. (2017). Public procurement with unverifiable quality: The case for discriminatory competitive procedures. Journal of Public Economics, 145, 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.11.004
2.
AlonsoJ. M.CliftonJ.Díaz-FuentesD. (2015). Did new public management matter? An empirical analysis of the outsourcing and decentralization effects on public sector size. Public Management Review, 17(5), 643–660.
3.
BaezaM. D. L. Á.VassalloJ. M. (2010). Private concession contracts for toll roads in Spain: Analysis and recommendations. Public Money & Management, 30(5), 299–304.
4.
BajariP.HoughtonS.TadelisS. (2014). Bidding for incomplete contracts: An empirical analysis of adaptation costs. The American Economic Review, 104(4), 1288–1319.
5.
BajariP.TadelisS. (2001). Incentives versus transaction costs: A theory of procurement contracts. The RAND Journal of Economics, 32(3), 387. https://doi.org/10.2307/2696361
6.
BauhrA. M.CzibikA.De Fine LichtJ.FazekasM. (2020). Lights on the shadows of public procurement : Transparency as an antidote to corruption. Governance, 33, 495–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12432
7.
BoyneG. A. (1998). Competitive tendering in local government: A review of theory and evidence. Public Administration, 76, 695–712.
8.
BrownT. L.PotoskiM. (2003a). Contract-management capacity in municipal and county governments. Public Administration Review, 63(2), 153–164.
9.
BrownT. L.PotoskiM. (2003b). Performance : A transaction costs approach. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 22(2), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.10117
10.
BrownT. L.PotoskiM.Van SlykeD. M. (2007). Trust and contract completeness in the public sector trust and contract completeness in the public sector. Local Government Studies, 33(4), 607–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930701417650
11.
BrunjesB. M. (2020). Competition and federal contractor performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(2), 202–219.
12.
BrunjesB. M. (2022). Your competitive side is calling: An analysis of Florida contract performance. Public Administration Review, 82(1), 83–101.
13.
BucciolA.ChillemiO.PalazziG. (2013). Cost overrun and auction format in small size public works. European Journal of Political Economy, 30, 35–42.
14.
CabralS. (2017). Reconciling conflicting policy objectives in public contracting: The enabling role of capabilities. Journal of Management Studies, 54(6), 823–853.
15.
CalverasA.GanuzaJ.-J.HaukE. (2004). Wild bids. Gambling for resurrection in procurement contracts. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 26(1), 41–68.
16.
CarpinetiL.PigaG.ZanzaM. (2006). The variety of procurement practice: Evidence from public procurement. In DimitriN.PigaG.SpagnoloG. (Eds.), Handbook of procurement (pp. 14–44). Cambridge University Press.
17.
CarrilR.LiraA. G.WalkerM. S. (2022). Competition under incomplete contracts and the design of procurement policies (Vol. 1). Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Department of Economics and Business.
18.
CostaC. C. M. (2019). Análise do efeito educativo das sanções nos contratos administrativos da administração pública federal no Brasil. Cadernos Enap, 65, 1–41.
19.
CoxD. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 34(2), 187–202.
20.
DecarolisF. (2014). Awarding price, contract performance, and bids screening: Evidence from procurement auctions. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6, 108–132.
21.
DimitriN.PigaG.SpagnoloG. (2006). Handbook of Procurement. Cambridge University Press.
22.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/258191
23.
EstacheA.IimiA. (2012). Quality or price ? Evidence from ODA-financed public procurement. Public Finance Review, 40(4), 435–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142111422436
24.
FernandezS. (2007). What works best when contracting for services? An analysis of contracting performance at the local level in the US. Public Administration, 85(4), 1119–1141.
FerrazC.FinanF.MoreiraD. B. (2012). Corrupting learning: Evidence from missing federal education funds in Brazil. Journal of Public Economics, 96(9–10), 712–726.
27.
FerrazC.FinanF.SzermanD. (2015). Procuring firm growth: The effects of government purchases on firm dynamics (No. w21219). National Bureau of Economic Research.
FlyvbjergB.HolmM. S.BuhlS.(2002). Underestimating costs in public works projects. Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(3), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360208976273
30.
GagnepainP.IvaldiM.MartimortD. (2013). The cost of contract renegotiation: Evidence from the local public sector. American Economic Review, 103(6), 2352–2383. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.6.2352
31.
GiffordJ. L.BolañosL. A.DaitoN.CasadyC. B. (2023). What triggers public-private partnership (PPP) renegotiations in the United States?Public Management Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2200404
32.
GirthA. M. (2014). A closer look at contract accountability: Exploring the determinants of sanctions for unsatisfactory contract performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(2), 317–348. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus033.
33.
GirthA. M. (2017). Incentives in third-party governance: Management practices and accountability implications. Public Administration Review, 77(3), 433–444.
34.
GirthA. M.LopezL. E. (2019). Contract design, complexity, and incentives: Evidence from US federal agencies. The American Review of Public Administration, 49(3), 325–337.
GuccioC.PignataroG.RizzoI. (2012). Determinants of adaptation costs in procurement : An empirical estimation on italian public works contracts determinants of adaptation costs in procurement : An empirical estimation on Italian public works contracts. Applied Economics, 44(15), 1891–1909. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.556589
37.
HansenM. B. (2010). Marketization and economic performance: Competitive tendering in the social sector. Public Management Review, 12(2), 255–274.
38.
HarrisA. B.BrunjesB. M. (2022). Developing capacity and reducing risk? An analysis of federal international contracting. International Public Management Journal, 25(5), 785–808.
39.
HefetzA.WarnerM. E. (2012). Contracting or public delivery? The importance of service, market, and management characteristics. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(2), 289–317.
40.
HoodC. C. (1990). A public management for all seasons?Public Administration, 69, 3–19.
41.
HoodC.JenningsW.CopelandP. (2016). Blame avoidance in comparative perspective: Reactivity, staged retreat and efficacy. Public Administration, 94(2), 542–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12235
42.
JensenC.MecklingH. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.
43.
Jiménez-GameroM. D.Alba-FernándezM. V. (2019). Testing for the Poisson–Tweedie distribution. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 164, 146–162.
44.
JohnstonJ. M.GirthA. M. (2012). Government contracts and ‘managing the market’ exploring the costs of strategic management responses to weak vendor competition. Administration & Society, 44(1), 3–29.
45.
KagelJ. H.LevinD. (1986)). The winner’s curse and public information in common value auctions. The American Economic Review, 76, 894–920.
46.
KauppiK.Van RaaijE. M. (2015). Opportunism and honest incompetence — Seeking explanations for noncompliance in public procurement. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(3), 953–979. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut081.
47.
KelmanS. J. (2002). Contracting. In SalamonL. M. (Ed.), The tools of government: A guide to the new governance (pp. 282–318). Oxford University Press.
KimY. W.RobertsA.BrownT. (2016). Impact of product characteristics and market conditions on contract type: Use of fixed-price versus cost-reimbursement contracts in the U.S. department of defense. Public Performance and Management Review, 39(4), 783–813. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1137765
50.
LamotheM.LamotheS. (2011). To trust or not to trust ? What matters in local government-vendor relationships?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 867–892. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur063
51.
LamotheS. (2015). How competitive is ‘ competitive ’ procurement in the social services?American Review of Public Administration, 45(5), 584–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074013520563
52.
LauermannS.WolinskyA. (2017). Bidder solicitation, adverse selection, and the failure of competition. American Economic Review, 107(6), 1399–1492
53.
LewisG.BajariP. (2011). Procurement contracting with time incentives: Theory and evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 1173–1211. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr026
54.
Macneil IR. (1978). Contracts: adjustment of long-term economic relations under classical, neoclassical and relational contract law. Northwestern University Law Review, 72, 854–905.
55.
MalatestaD.SmithC. R. (2011). The effects of competition-based public policy on contractual arrangements. Policy Studies Journal, 39(2), 261–283.
56.
McafeeR. P.McmillanJ. (1987). Auctions and bidding. Journal of Economic Literature, 25(2), 699–738.
57.
McafeeR. P.McmillanJ. (1988). Incentives in government contracting. University of Toronto Press.
58.
PetersenO. H.BaekkeskovE.PotoskiM.BrownT. L. (2019). Measuring and managing ex ante transaction costs in public sector contracting. Public Administration Review, 79(5), 641–650. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13048
59.
PoppoL.ZengerT. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements?Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 707–725.
60.
ReisP. R. C.CabralS. (2015). Public procurement strategy: The impacts of a preference programme for small and micro businesses. Public Money & Management, 962, 954–962. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2015.1007704
61.
ReisP. R. C.CabralS. (2018). Para Além Dos Preços Contratados : Fatores Determinantes Da Celeridade Nas Entregas de Compras Públicas Eletrônicas. Revista de Administração Pública, 52(1), 107–125.
62.
SaussierS.TiroleJ. (2015). Strengthening the efficiency of public procurement. Notes Du Conseil d’analyse Économique, 3, 1–12.
63.
SavasE. S. (2000). Privatization and public-private partnerships. Chatham House.
64.
ShleiferA. (1998). State versus private ownership. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(4), 133–150.
65.
SimonetD. (2015). The new public management theory in the British health care system: A critical review. Administration & Society, 47(7), 802–826.
66.
SoudryO. (2004). Promoting economy: Electronic reverse auctions under the EC directives on public procurement. Journal of Public Procurement, 4(3), 340–374.
67.
SpulberD. F. (1990). Auctions and contract enforcement. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 6(2), 325–344.
68.
SzermanD. (2012). Public procurement auctions in Brazil (Doctoral dissertation, London School of Economics and Political Science).
69.
TadelisS. (2012). Public procurement design: Lessons from the private sector. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 30(3), 297–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2012.02.002
70.
Vam SlykeD. M. (2007). Agents or stewards : Using theory to understand the government-nonprofit social service contracting relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory Theory, 17(2), 157–187. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mul012
71.
XacurO. A. QGarridoJ. (2015). Generalised linear models for aggregate claims: To Tweedie or not?European Actuarial Journal, 5(1), 181–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13385-015-0108-5
72.
YackeeJ. W.YackeeS. W. (2010). Administrative procedures and bureaucratic performance: Is federal rule-making ‘ossified’?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(2), 261–282. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mup011
73.
YangK.Yi HsiehJ.LiT. S. (2009). Contracting capacity and perceived contracting performance: Nonlinear effects and the role of time. Public Administration Review, 69(4), 681–696. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02017.x.
74.
WalkerR. M.BoyneG. A. (2006). Public management reform and organizational performance: An empirical assessment of the UK Labour government’s public service improvement strategy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25(2), 371–393.
75.
WilliamsonO. (1979). Transaction cost economics: The governance of contractual relationships. Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2), 233–261
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
