Despite extensive research on Public Service Motivation (PSM), reconciling the debate over whether PSM is a state or a trait remains a challenge among public administration scholars. Studies exploring the antecedents of PSM that engage in this debate often overlook the importance of organizational factors in influencing PSM. Framed within the literature on the behavioral aspects of performance information processing and adopting a propensity-score-matching model with data from a Chinese local government, we examine whether and how performance ratings influence public service motivation of public servants. The results show that performance ratings have a crowding-out effect, underscoring how the ways in which signals of performance feedback are conveyed to public servants can shape PSM. Our findings contribute to understanding the antecedents that preserve and promote public service motivation. We call for future research that focuses on public-value-based performance appraisal systems in centralized regimes.
AbadieA.ImbensG. W. (2016). Matching on the estimated propensity score. Econometrica, 84(2), 781–807.
2.
AhnY.CampbellJ. W. (2022). Red tape, rule legitimacy, and public service motivation: Experimental evidence from Korean citizens. Administration & Society, 54(9), 1651–1688.
3.
AndersenL. B.JørgensenT. B.KjeldsenA. M.PedersenL. H.VrangbækK. (2013). Public values and public service motivation: Conceptual and empirical relationships. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(3), 292–311.
4.
BaoG.WangX.LarsenG. L.MorganD. F. (2013). Beyond new public governance: A value-based global framework for performance management, governance, and leadership. Administration & Society, 45(4), 443–467.
5.
BaoY.LiC. (2016). Measuring public service motivation: Theoretical structure and scale revision. Human Resources Development of China, 349(7), 83–91. (In Chinese).
6.
BehnR. D. (1995). The big questions of public management. Public Administration Review, 55(4), 313–324.
7.
BelléN. (2015). Performance-related pay and the crowding out of motivation in the public sector: A randomized field experiment. Public Administration Review, 75(2), 230–241.
8.
BermanE. M.BowmanJ. S.WestJ. P.Van WartM. R. (2021). Human resource management in public service: Paradoxes, processes, and problems. CQ Press.
9.
BertelliA. M. (2006). Motivation crowding and the federal civil servant: Evidence from the US Internal Revenue Service. International Public Management Journal, 9(1), 3–23.
10.
BertelliA. M. (2007). Determinants of bureaucratic turnover intention: Evidence from the Department of the Treasury. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(2), 235–258.
11.
BolandT.FowlerA. (2000). A systems perspective of performance management in public sector organisations. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 13(5), 417–446.
12.
BoswellW. R.BoudreauJ. W. (2000). Employee satisfaction with performance appraisals and appraisers: The role of perceived appraisal use. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11(3), 283–299.
13.
BozemanB.SuX. (2015). Public service motivation concepts and theory: A critique. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 700–710.
14.
BrewerG. A.SeldenS. C.Facer IiR. L. (2000). Individual conceptions of public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 60(3), 254–264.
15.
BrightL. (2007). Does person-organization fit mediate the relationship between public service motivation and the job performance of public employees?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 27(4), 361–379.
16.
CaldeiraE. (2012). Yardstick competition in a federation: Theory and evidence from China. China Economic Review, 23(4), 878–897.
17.
CamilleriE. (2007). Antecedents affecting public service motivation. Personnel Review, 36(3), 356–377.
18.
CamilleriE.Van Der HeijdenB. I. (2007). Organizational commitment, public service motivation, and performance within the public sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 31(2), 241–274.
19.
ChoY. J.PerryJ. L. (2012). Intrinsic motivation and employee attitudes: Role of managerial trustworthiness, goal directedness, and extrinsic reward expectancy. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32(4), 382–406.
20.
ChristensenR. K.PaarlbergL.PerryJ. L. (2017). Public service motivation research: Lessons for practice. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 529–542.
21.
ChristensenT.LægreidP. (2007). The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1059–1066.
22.
CorduneanuR.DudauA.KominisG. (2020). Crowding-in or crowding-out: The contribution of self-determination theory to public service motivation. Public Management Review, 22(7), 1070–1089.
23.
CourseyD. H.PandeyS. K. (2007). Public service motivation measurement: Testing an abridged version of Perry’s proposed scale. Administration & Society, 39(5), 547–568.
24.
DaleyD. M. (1992). Performance appraisal in the public sector: Techniques and applications. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
25.
DehejiaR. H.WahbaS. (2002). Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 151–161.
26.
DiefenbachT. (2009). New public management in public sector organizations: The dark sides of managerialistic “enlightenment”. Public Administration, 87(4), 892–909.
27.
FareedM. Z.SuQ. (2022). Transformational leadership and project success: A mediating role of public service motivation. Administration & Society, 54(4), 690-713.
28.
FernandezS.MoldogazievT. (2013). Using employee empowerment to encourage innovative behavior in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 155–187.
29.
FrankS. A.LewisG. B. (2004). Government employees: Working hard or hardly working?The American Review of Public Administration, 34(1), 36–51.
30.
FrenchP. E.EmersonM. C. (2015). One size does not fit all: Matching the reward to the employee’s motivational needs. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 35(1), 82–94.
31.
FreyB. S.HombergF.OsterlohM. (2013). Organizational control systems and pay-for-performance in the public service. Organization Studies, 34(7), 949–972.
32.
GabrisG. T.IhrkeD. M. (2001). Does performance appraisal contribute to heightened levels of employee burnout? The results of one study. Public Personnel Management, 30(2), 157–172.
33.
GeorgeB.PandeyS. K. (2017). We know the Yin—but where is the Yang? Toward a balanced approach on common source bias in public administration scholarship. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(2), 245–270.
34.
GeorgellisY.IossaE.TabvumaV. (2011). Crowding out intrinsic motivation in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), 473–493.
35.
GilesW. F.MossholderK. W. (1990). Employee reactions to contextual and session components of performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(4), 371–377.
36.
GrantA. M. (2008). Employees without a cause: The motivational effects of prosocial impact in public service. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 48–66.
37.
GreveH. R. (1998). Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 58–86.
38.
GreveH. R. (2003). Organizational learning from performance feedback: A behavioral perspective on innovation and change. Cambridge University Press.
39.
HanY. (2018). Is public service motivation changeable? Integrative modeling with goal-setting theory. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(3), 216–225.
40.
HarringtonJ. R.LeeJ. H. (2015). What drives perceived fairness of performance appraisal? Exploring the effects of psychological contract fulfillment on employees’ perceived fairness of performance appraisal in U.S. federal agencies. Public Personnel Management, 44(2), 214–238.
41.
HatryH. P. (2006). Performance measurement: Getting results. The Urban Institute.
42.
HaverlandM.YanowD. (2012). A hitchhiker’s guide to the public administration research universe: Surviving conversations on methodologies and methods. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 401–408.
43.
HoustonD. J. (2000). Public-service motivation: A multivariate test. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 713–728.
44.
HuangQ.LiuH. (2023). How does paternalistic leadership enhance civil servants’ public service motivation? The mediating mechanism of trust in leader. Administration & Society, 55(9), 1680–1709.
45.
JacobsenC. B.HvitvedJ.AndersenL. B. (2014). Command and motivation: How the perception of external interventions relates to intrinsic motivation and public service motivation. Public Administration, 92(4), 790–806.
46.
JensenU. T.AndersenL. B.JacobsenC. B. (2019). Only when we agree! How value congruence moderates the impact of goal-oriented leadership on public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 79(1), 12–24.
47.
JohnsonR. B.OnwuegbuzieA. J.TurnerL. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133.
48.
JungC. S. (2014). Organizational goal ambiguity and job satisfaction in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(4), 955–981.
49.
KamedaT.DavisJ. H. (1990). The function of the reference point in individual and group risk decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46(1), 55–76.
50.
KelloughJ. E.NigroL. G. (2002). Pay for performance in Georgia state government: Employee perspectives on GeorgiaGain after 5 years. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 22(2), 146–166.
51.
KimJ. (2016). Impact of performance appraisal justice on the effectiveness of pay-for-performance systems after civil service reform. Public Personnel Management, 45(2), 148–170.
52.
KimS.VandenabeeleW.WrightB. E.AndersenL. B.CeraseF. P.ChristensenR. K.DesmaraisC.KoumentaM.LeisinkP.LiuB.PalidauskaiteJ.PedersenL. H.PerryJ. L.RitzA.TaylorJ.De VivoP. (2012). Investigating the structure and meaning of public service motivation across populations: Developing an international instrument and addressing issues of measurement invariance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 79–102.
53.
KimT.HolzerM. (2016). Public employees and performance appraisal: A study of antecedents to employees’ perception of the process. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36(1), 31–56.
54.
KingG.NielsenR. (2019). Why propensity scores should not be used for matching. Political Analysis, 27(4), 435–454.
55.
KondukB. C. (2019). The role of performance feedback consistency in aspiration level adaptation: Evidence from a European grocery retailer. Journal of General Management, 45(1), 18–29.
56.
KoniskyD. M.ReenockC. (2013). Case selection in public management research: Problems and solutions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(2), 361–393.
57.
KrepsD. M. (1997). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives. The American Economic Review, 87(2), 359–364.
58.
KrollA.VogelD. (2014). The PSM–leadership fit: A model of performance information use. Public Administration, 92(4), 974–991.
59.
KuvaasB.BuchR.WeibelA.DysvikA.NerstadC. G. (2017). Do intrinsic and extrinsic motivation relate differently to employee outcomes?Journal of Economic Psychology, 61, 244–258.
60.
LarssonB.Ulfsdotter ErikssonY.AdolfssonP. (2022). Motivating and demotivating effects of performance-related pay in Swedish public sector organizations. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 42(3), 444–463.
61.
LiJ. (2015). The paradox of performance regimes: Strategic responses to target regimes in Chinese local government. Public Administration, 93(4), 1152–1167.
62.
LinY. C.KelloughJ. E. (2019). Performance appraisal problems in the public sector: Examining supervisors’ perceptions. Public Personnel Management, 48(2), 179–202.
63.
LiuB.TangN.ZhuX. (2008). Public service motivation and job satisfaction in China. International Journal of Manpower, 29(8), 684–699.
64.
LiuB.TangT. L. P. (2011). Does the love of money moderate the relationship between public service motivation and job satisfaction? The case of Chinese professionals in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 71(5), 718–727.
65.
LiuX.DongK. (2012). Development of the civil servants’ performance appraisal system in China: Challenges and improvements. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32(2), 149–168.
66.
LovrichN. P.ShafferP. L.HopkinsR. H.YaleD. A. (1980). Do public servants welcome or fear merit evaluation of their performance?Public Administration Review, 40(3), 214–222.
67.
MeierK. J.O’TooleL. J. (2012). Subjective organizational performance and measurement error: Common source bias and spurious relationships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(2), 429–456.
68.
MeleV.BelardinelliP. (2019). Mixed methods in public administration research: Selecting, sequencing, and connecting. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(2), 334–347.
69.
MilkovichG. T.WigdorA. K. (1991). Pay for performance: Evaluating performance appraisal and merit pay. National Academy Press.
70.
MortimerJ. T.LorenceJ. (1979). Occupational experience and the self-concept: A longitudinal study. Social Psychology Quarterly, 307–323.
71.
MoynihanD. P.FernandezS.KimS.LeRouxK. M.PiotrowskiS. J.WrightB. E.YangK. (2011). Performance regimes amidst governance complexity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(suppl_1), i141–i155.
72.
MoynihanD. P.PandeyS. K. (2007). The role of organizations in fostering public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 67(1), 40–53.
73.
MoynihanD. P.PandeyS. K. (2010). The big question for performance management: Why do managers use performance information?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 849–866.
74.
NguyenN. T. H.NguyenD.VoN.TuanL. T. (2023). Fostering public sector employees’ innovative behavior: The roles of servant leadership, public service motivation, and learning goal orientation. Administration & Society, 55(1), 30–63.
75.
NielsenP. A. (2014). Learning from performance feedback: Performance information, aspiration levels, and managerial priorities. Public Administration, 92(1), 142–160.
76.
NiuX.WangX.XiaoH. (2018). What motivates environmental leadership behaviour: An empirical analysis in Taiwan. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 11(2), 173–187.
77.
OhS. S.LewisG. B. (2009). Can performance appraisal systems inspire intrinsically motivated employees?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 29(2), 158–167.
78.
PaarlbergL. E.PerryJ. L.HondeghemA. (2008). From theory to practice: Strategies for applying public service motivation. In PerryJ. L.HondeghemA. (Eds.), Motivation in public management: The call of public service (pp. 268–293). Oxford University Press.
79.
PandeyS. K.StazykE. C. (2008). Antecedents and correlates of public service motivation. In PerryJ. L.HondeghemA. (Eds.), Motivation in public management: The call of public service (pp. 294–314). Oxford University Press.
80.
ParkS. (2014). Motivation of public managers as raters in performance appraisal: Developing a model of rater motivation. Public Personnel Management, 43(4), 387–414.
81.
PerryJ. L.WiseL. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367–373.
82.
PerryJ. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 5–22.
83.
PerryJ. L. (1997). Antecedents of public service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(2), 181–197.
84.
PerryJ. L. (2000). Bringing society in: Toward a theory of public-service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 471–488.
85.
PerryJ. L. (2014). The motivational bases of public service: Foundations for a third wave of research. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 36(1), 34–47.
86.
PerryJ. L.BrudneyJ. L.CourseyD.LittlepageL. (2008). What drives morally committed citizens? A study of the antecedents of public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 68(3), 445–458.
87.
PerryJ. L.HondeghemA.WiseL. R. (2010). Revisiting the motivational bases of public service: Twenty years of research and an agenda for the future. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 681–690.
88.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.PodsakoffN. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569.
89.
QianJ.HeA. J. (2018). The bonus scheme, motivation crowding-out and quality of the doctor-patient encounters in Chinese public hospitals. Public Organization Review, 18(2), 143–158.
90.
RaineyH. G.SteinbauerP. (1999). Galloping elephants: Developing elements of a theory of effective government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(1), 1–32.
91.
ReiterR.KlenkT. (2019). The manifold meanings of “post-new public management”: A systematic literature review. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(1), 11–27.
92.
RiccucciN. M. (2018). Antecedents of public service motivation: The role of gender. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 1(2), 115–126.
93.
RitzA.BrewerG. A.NeumannO. (2016). Public service motivation: A systematic literature review and outlook. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 414–426.
94.
RosenbaumP. R.RubinD. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55.
95.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.
96.
SchleicherD. J.BaumannH. M.SullivanD. W.YimJ. (2019). Evaluating the effectiveness of performance management: A 30-year integrative conceptual review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(7), 851–887.
97.
SchönherrL.ThalerJ. (2023). Personality traits and public service motivation as psychological antecedents of managerial networking. Public Management Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2192218
98.
SchottC.RitzA. (2018). The dark sides of public service motivation: A multi-level theoretical framework. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 1(1), 29–42.
99.
SchwabD. P. (2005). Research methods for organizational studies (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
100.
SimonH. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99–118.
101.
StazykE. C. (2013). Crowding out public service motivation? Comparing theoretical expectations with empirical findings on the influence of performance-related pay. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 33(3), 252–274.
102.
TriandisH. C. (2018). Individualism and collectivism. Routledge.
103.
Van LoonN. M. (2017). Does context matter for the type of performance-related behavior of public service motivated employees?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(4), 405–429.
104.
Van ThielS.LeeuwF. L. (2002). The performance paradox in the public sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 25(3), 267–281.
105.
Van WitteloostuijnA.EsteveM.BoyneG. (2017). Public sector motivation ad fonts: Personality traits as antecedents of the motivation to serve the public interest. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(1), 20–35.
106.
VandenabeeleW. (2007). Toward a public administration theory of public service motivation: An institutional approach. Public Management Review, 9(4), 545–556.
107.
VandenabeeleW. (2011). Who wants to deliver public service? Do institutional antecedents of public service motivation provide an answer?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 31(1), 87–107.
108.
WangX. (2002). Assessing performance measurement impact: A study of U. S. local governments. Public Performance & Management Review, 26(1), 26–43.
109.
WangX.BermanE. M.ChenD. Y.NiuX. (2019). Strategies to improve environmental networks for pollution control: Evidence from eco-compensation programs in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 234, 387–395.
110.
WangX.WangZ. (2020). Beyond efficiency or justice: The structure and measurement of public servants’ public values preferences. Administration & Society, 52(4), 499–527.
111.
WeibelA.RostK.OsterlohM. (2010). Pay for performance in the public sector; Benefits and (hidden) costs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(2), 387–412.
112.
WeibelA.WiemannM.OsterlohM. (2014). A behavioral economics perspective on the over justification effect: Crowding-in and crowding-out of intrinsic motivation. In GagnéM. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of work engagement, motivation, and self-determination theory (pp. 72–84). Oxford University Press.
113.
WitesmanE. V. A.WaltersL. (2014). Public service values: A new approach to the study of motivation in the public sphere. Public Administration, 92(2), 375–405.
114.
WrightB. E. (2004). The role of work context in work motivation: A public sector application of goal and social cognitive theories. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(1), 59–78.
115.
WrightB. E.ChristensenR. K.PandeyS. K. (2013). Measuring public service motivation: Exploring the equivalence of existing global measures. International Public Management Journal, 16(2), 197–223.
116.
WrightB. E.PandeyS. K. (2011). Public organizations and mission valence: When does mission matter?Administration & Society, 43(1), 22–44.
117.
YangB. (2012). Confucianism, socialism, and capitalism: A comparison of cultural ideologies and implied managerial philosophies and practices in the P. R. of China. Human Resource Management Review, 22(3), 165–178.
118.
YangK.HsiehJ. Y. (2007). Managerial effectiveness of government performance measurement: Testing a middle-range model. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 861–879.
119.
ZhouZ. (2010). Performance management reforms in mainland China. In BermanE. M.MoonM. J.ChoiH. (Eds.), Public administration in East Asia (pp. 117–143). CRC Press.
120.
ZhuC.XiaoY.WangR. (2023). Behavioral influences on the relationship between firms’ aspiration performance gap and innovation input: The moderating role of executives’ vocational socialization. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 40(3), 358–380.
