The quality and quantity of e-participation procedures depend heavily on the acceptance of the local government employees involved. Based on Venkatesh’s unified theory of acceptance and use of technology, this study investigates the factors influencing these employees’ usage intentions. The results of an online survey of German local government employees show that facilitating conditions, performance expectancy, and social influence significantly impact acceptance. The effect of factors like administrative culture could not be confirmed. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
AjzenI. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In KuhlJ.BeckmannJ. (Eds.), Action control (pp. 11–39). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
2.
AlbrechtS.KohlrauschS.KubicekH.LippaB.MärkerO.TrénelM.VorwerkV.WestholmH.WiedwaldC. (2008). eParticipation – Electronic participation of citizens and the business community in eGovernment: Study on behalf of the federal ministry of the interior (Germany). ifib.
3.
AlrawashdehT. A.Al-MahadeenB. M. (2013). Extended UTAUT to examine the acceptance of web based training system by public sector. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 7(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v7i1.2044
AndersonJ. C.GerbingD. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
6.
AwangZ. (2014). Research methodology and data analysis (2nd ed.). Penerbit Universiti Teknologi MARA Press.
7.
BarrettP. (2007). Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 815–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.018
8.
BenE. R.SchuppanT. (2015). E-government innovations and work transformations. In Information R. Management Association (Ed.), Public affairs and administration (pp. 1722–1738). IGI Global.
9.
BogumilJ.HoltkampL. (2013). Kommunalpolitik und Kommunalverwaltung: Eine praxisorientierte Einführung ([Vollst. Neufassung]). Schriftenreihe / Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung: Vol. 1329. Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. https://d-nb.info/1033632015/04
10.
BuurmanM.DelfgaauwJ.DurR.van den BosscheS. (2012). Public sector employees: Risk averse and altruistic?Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83(3), 279–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2012.06.003
11.
Carley-BaxterL. R.HillC. A.RoeD. J.TwiddyS. E.BaxterR. K.RuppenkampJ. (2009). Does response rate matter? Journal editors use of survey quality measures in manuscript publication decisions. Survey Practice, 2(7), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2009-0033
12.
Carr-WestJ., (2018). Redressing the trust deficit. Local governments and citizen engagement. In KerleyR.LiddleJ.DunningP. T. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of international local government (pp. 296–306). Routledge.
13.
ChadwickA. (2011). Explaining the failure of an online citizen engagement initiative: The role of internal institutional variables. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 8(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2010.507999
14.
ChandonP.MorwitzV. G.ReinartzW. J. (2005). Do intentions really predict behavior? Self-generated validity effects in survey research. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.69.2.1.60755
ChoiB.RavichandranT.O’ConnorG. C. (2019). Organizational conservatism, strategic human resource management, and breakthrough innovation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 66(4), 529–541. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2018.2845343.
17.
D’AgostinoM.SchwesterR.TonyC.MelitskiJ. (2011). A study of E-government and E-governance: An empirical examination of municipal websites. Public Administration Quarterly, 35(3–25), 10.
18.
DavisF. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems - theory and results [PhD thesis]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
19.
DečmanM. (2015). Understanding technology acceptance of government information systems from employees’ perspective. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 11(4), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2015100104.
20.
DuyckP.PynooBDevolderP.VoetT.AdangL.VercruysseJ. (2008). Do hospital physicians really want to go digital? - Acceptance of a picture archiving and communication system in a university hospital. RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin, 180, 631–638. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1027344
21.
El-HaddadehR.WeerakkodyV.Al-ShafiS. (2013). The complexities of electronic services implementation and institutionalisation in the public sector. Information & Management, 50(4), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.02.005
22.
FaupelS. (2020). Predicting managers’ championing behavior through subordinates’ change-related voice. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 35(5), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-05-2019-0272
23.
FaupelS.SüßS. (2019). The effect of transformational leadership on employees during organizational change: An empirical analysis. Journal of Change Management, 19(3), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2018.1447006
24.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
25.
FrankeT.AttigC.WesselD. (2018). A personal resource for technology interaction: Development and Validation of the Affinity for Technology Interaction (ATI) Scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 35(6), 456–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1456150
26.
FreschiA. C.MedagliaR.NørbjergJ., eds. 2009. EParticipation in the institutional domain: A review of research: Analytical report on EParticipation research from an administration and political perspective in six European countries. DEMO-net Booklet Series Bd. 14.1. DEMO-Net Consortium.
27.
FriessD.TobiasE.GerlK.BaurmannM. (2021). Political online participation and its effects: Theory, measurement, and results. Policy & Internet, 13(3), 345–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.270
28.
GefenD.StraubD.BoudreauM. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(1), article 7.
29.
GroßeK. (2018). Benutzerzentrierte E-Partizipation. Typologie, Anforderungen und Gestaltungsempfehlungen. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
30.
GrunwaldA.BanseG.CoenenC.HennenL. (2005). Internet und Demokratie. Endbericht zum TA-Projekt Analyse netzbasierter Kommunikation unter kulturellen Aspekten. Büro für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung beim Deutschen Bundestag (TAB).
31.
GunawanH. (2018, October23–26). Identifying factors affecting smart city adoption using the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) method [Conference session]. 2018 International Conference on Orange Technologies (ICOT), Nusa Dua, Bali, Indonesia (pp. 1–4). IEEE.
32.
HairJ. F.BlackW.BabinB.AndersonR. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
33.
HairJ. F.RingleC. M.SarstedtM. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
34.
HaklayM.JankowskiP.ZwolinskiZ. (2018). Selected modern methods and tools for public participation in urban planning – A review. Quaestiones Geographicae, 37(3), 127–149. https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2018-0030
35.
HarknessJ. A. (2008). Round 4 ESS translation strategies and procedures. London.
36.
HartlE.NawrathD.HessT. (2018). Refining the influence of organizational culture on individual IS adoption (Research papers 90). AIS. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2018_rp/90
37.
HitschfeldU. (2020). Steuerung von Partizipation und Anforderungen an das Verfahrensdesign. In LorenzA.HoffmannC. P.HitschfeldU. (Eds.), Partizipation für alle und alles? (pp. 345–362). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
38.
HofstedeG.HofstedeG. J.MinkovM. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind; Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival (Rev. and expanded 3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
39.
HoltkampL. (2009). Verwaltung und Partizipation: Von der Hierarchie zur partizipativen Governance? In CzerwickE.LorigW. H.TreutnerE. (Eds.), Die öffentliche Verwaltung in der Demokratie der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (pp. 65–86). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
40.
HooperD.CoughlanJ.MullenM. (2007). Structural equation modeling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.
41.
HossanC. G.RyanJ. C. (2016). Factors affecting e-government technology adoption behaviour in a voluntary environment. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 12(1), 24–49. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2016010102
42.
HusseyD. M.EaganP. D. (2007). Using structural equation modeling to test environmental performance in small and medium-sized manufacturers: Can SEM help SMEs?Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(4), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.12.002
KanungoS.JainV. (2011). Organizational culture and E-government performance. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 7(2), 36–58. https://doi.org/10.4018/jegr.2011040103
45.
KimC.-G.HolzerM. (2006). Public administrators’ acceptance of the practice of digital democracy. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 2(2), 22–48. https://doi.org/10.4018/jegr.2006040102
46.
LeeD.RheeY.DunhamR. B. (2009). The role of organizational and individual characteristics in technology acceptance. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 25(7), 623–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310902963969.
47.
MacintoshA. (2008). E-democracy and E-participation research in Europe. In ShardaR.VoßS.ChenH.BrandtL.GreggV.TraunmüllerR.DawesS.HovyE.MacintoshA.LarsonC. A. (Eds.), Digital government (Vol. 17, pp. 85–102). Integrated Series in Information Systems. Springer US.
48.
McDonnellJ. (2020). Municipality size, political efficacy and political participation: A systematic review. Local Government Studies, 46(3), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2019.1600510
49.
MedagliaR. (2007). Measuring the diffusion of eParticipation: A survey on Italian local government. Information Polity, 12(4), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2007-0134
50.
Naranjo-ZolotovM.OliveiraT.CasteleynS. (2018). E-participation adoption models research in the last 17 years: A weight and meta-analytical review. Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 350–365.
51.
NistorN.LercheT.WeinbergerA.CeobanuC.HeymannO. (2014). Towards the integration of culture into the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01383.x
52.
OrlikowskiW. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600
53.
OsborneS. P.RadnorZ.StrokoschK. (2016). Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: A suitable case for treatment?Public Management Review, 18(5), 639–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1111927
54.
PanopoulouE.TambourisE.TarabanisK. (2014). Success factors in designing eParticipation initiatives. Information and Organization, 24(4), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2014.08.001
55.
Pardo-del-ValM.Martinez-FuentesC. (2003). Resistance to change: A literature review and empirical study. Management Decision, 41, 148–155.
56.
PerisM.NüttgensM. (2011, February 21-23). Anwendung der Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology zur Akzeptanzbestimmung von Web 2.0-Anwendungen in KMU-Netzwerken [Conference session]. In MaierR. (Ed.), 6th Conference on Professional Knowledge Management – From Knowledge to Action, Innsbruck, Austria, Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V.
57.
PruinA. (2022). How organisational factors shape e-participation: Lessons from the German one-stop participation portal meinBerlin. In Randma-LiivT.LemberV. (Eds.), Engaging citizens in policy-making: E-participation practices in Europe (pp. 209–224). Edward Elgar.
58.
RanaN. P.DwivediY. K.WilliamsM. D. (2013). Evaluating alternative theoretical models for examining citizen centric adoption of e-government. Transforming Government, 7(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506161311308151
59.
ReddickC. G. (2011). Citizen interaction and e-government. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 5(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506161111131195
60.
RodeH. (2016). To share or not to share: The effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivations on knowledge-sharing in enterprise social media platforms. Journal of Information Technology, 31(2), 152–165. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2016.8
RoyoS.PinaV.Garcia-RayadoJ. (2020). Decide Madrid: A critical analysis of an award-winning e-participation initiative. Sustainability, 12(4), 1674. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041674
63.
RoyoS.YetanoA.AcereteB. (2014). E-participation and environmental protection: Are local governments really committed?Public Administration Review, 74(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12156
64.
SæbøØ.FlakL. S.SeinM. K. (2011). Understanding the dynamics in e-Participation initiatives: Looking through the genre and stakeholder lenses. Government Information Quarterly, 28(3), 416–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.10.005
65.
SarantisD.SmithsonS.CharalabidisY.AskounisD. (2010). A critical assessment of project management methods with respect to electronic government implementation challenges. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 23(4), 301–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-009-9161-9
66.
SatowL. (2012). SEA - Skala zur Erfassung von Testverfälschung durch positive Selbstdarstellung und sozial erwünschte Antworttendenzen. ZPID.
67.
SchlozmanK. L.VerbaS.BradyH. E. (2010). Weapon of the strong? Participatory inequality and the internet. Perspectives on Politics, 8(2), 487–509.
68.
SchmidK.WilkeP. (2016). Branchenanalyse kommunale Verwaltung: Zwischen Finanzrestriktionen und veränderten Arbeitsanforderungen: welche Trends bestimmen die Beschäftigungsentwicklung in der kommunalen Verwaltung? With the assistance of S. Gröning. Study / Hans-Böckler-Stiftung Nr. 314. Hans-Böckler-Stiftung. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/129071.
69.
SeyfriedM.VeitS. (2017). Methoden und Daten zur Erforschung spezieller Organisationen: Öffentliche Verwaltung. In LiebigS.MatiaskeW.RosenbohmS. (Eds.), Handbuch Empirische Organisationsforschung (pp. 631–655). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
70.
SharmaG. (2014). E-government, E-participation and challenging issues: A case study. International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management, 22(1), 23–35.
71.
SimonofskiA.SnoeckM.VanderoseB.CrompvoetsJ.HabraN. (2017). Reexamining E-participation: Systematic literature review on citizen participation in E-government service delivery [Conference session]. Americas Conference on Information Systems, Boston, MA, August 10–12, 2017.
72.
SivoS. A.FanX.WittaE. L.WillseJ. T. (2006). The search for optimal cutoff properties: Fit index criteria in structural equation modeling. The Journal of Experimental Education, 74(3), 267–88. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.74.3.267-288
73.
SteinbachM.SüßS. (2018). Administrators’ identities and strategies in the e-participation innovation process: A qualitative analysis of institutional logics and institutional work in German municipalities. Intellectual Property, 23(3), 281–305. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-170037
74.
StuchlikA. (2009). Zivilgesellschaft und Verwaltungskultur - eine Suche nach theoretischen Anknüpfungspunkten. In KönigK. (Ed.), Theoretische Aspekte einer zivilgesellschaftlichen Verwaltungskultur, Speyerer Forschungsberichte (Vol. 263, pp. 33–50). German Research Institute for Public Administration Speyer.
75.
SukumarG.ReddickC. G. (2016). Information technology in public administration education. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 22(2), 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2016.12002237
76.
TaberK. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
77.
TaiK.PorumbescuG.ShonJ. (2020). Can e-participation stimulate offline citizen participation: An empirical test with practical implications. Public Management Review, 22(2), 278–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1584233.
78.
TempletonL.DeehanA.TaylorC.DrummondC.StrangJ. (1997). Surveying general practitioners: Does a low response rate matter?The British Journal of General Practice the Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 47, 91–94.
79.
TootsM. (2019). Why E-participation systems fail: The case of Estonia’s Osale.ee. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 546–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.02.002
80.
TwizeyimanaJ. D.AnderssonA. (2019). The public value of E-Government – A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001
81.
VenkateshV.DavisF. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
82.
VenkateshV.MorrisM. G.DavisG. B.DavisF. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
83.
VenkateshV.ThongJ.XuX. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328–376. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00428
84.
VenturaS. J. (1995). The use of geographic information systems in local government. Public Administration Review, 55(5), 461. https://doi.org/10.2307/976770
85.
von der GönnaJ. A. (2017). Personality and computing: zum Zusammenspiel von Mensch und Maschine [Thesis]. DPhil Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München.
86.
WagenknechtT.FilpeR.WeinhardtC. (2016). Towards a research framework of computer-supported organizational participation. In TambourisE.PanagiotopoulosP.SæbøØWimmerM. A.PardoT. A.CharalabidisY.Sá SoaresD.JanowskiT.(Eds.), Electronic participation. ePart 2016. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 9821, pp. 17–28). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45074-2_2
87.
WangM. H. (2016). Factors influencing usage of e-learning systems in Taiwan’s public sector: Applying the UTAUT model. Advances in Management and Applied Economics, 6(6), 63–82.
88.
WilliamsM. D.RanaN. P.DwivediY. K. (2015). The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): A literature review. Journal of Enterprise Info Management, 28(3), 443–488. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2014-0088
89.
WirtzB. W.DaiserP.BinkowskaB. (2018). E-participation. A strategic framework. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(1), 1–12.
90.
ZhangF.FeeneyM. K. (2018). Managerial ambivalence and electronic civic engagement: The role of public manager beliefs and perceived needs. Public Administration Review, 78(1), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12853.
ZhengY.SchachterH. L. (2018). The impact of administrator willingness on website e-participation: Some evidence from municipalities. Public Performance & Management Review, 41(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2017.1400988
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
