Mini-publics,Social Legitimacy and Institutional Collaboration: Some Inherent Trade-offs and Three Alternative Design Strategies

Abstract

Over the last few decades, an increasing number of governments have promoted the setting up of so called “mini-publics” to integrate policymaking processes in an attempt to improve policy decisions. This phenomenon has highlighted the importance of mini-publics to become fully integrated in our democratic systems. By presenting the findings of empirical research conducted on 29 local mini-publics, this paper aims to explain how mini-public design elements can affect the capacity of mini-publics to trigger or hinder two key integration mechanisms: the social legitimation mechanism and the institutional collaboration mechanism.

Keywords

mini-publics deliberation participation collaborative governance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bherer

Gauthier

Simard

(2021). Developing the public participation field: The role of independent bodies for public participation. Administration & Society, 53, 680–707. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399720957606

Bobbio

(Ed.) (2004). A più voci. Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.

Bobbio

(2017). Neither completely political nor completely unpolitical. The third way of deliberative arenas. Participation and Conflict, 10(2), 613–635. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v10i2p613

Bobbio

(2019). Designing effective public participation. Policy and Society, 38(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1511193

Brummer

(2018). Community energy – Benefits and barriers: A comparative literature review of Community Energy in the UK, Germany and the USA, the benefits it provides for society and the barriers it faces. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 94, 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.013

Bryson

J. M.

Quick

K. S.

Slotterback

C. S.

Crosby

B. C.

(2013). Designing public participation processes. Public Administration Review, 73(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02678.x

Bua

(2017). Scale and policy impact in participatory-deliberative democracy: Lessons from a multi-level process. Public Administration, 95(1), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12297

Caluwaerts

Reuchamps

(2015). Strengthening democracy through bottom-up deliberation: An assessment of the internal legitimacy of the G1000 project. Acta Politica, 50(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2014.2

Caluwaerts

Reuchamps

(2016). Generating Democratic legitimacy through deliberative innovations: The role of embeddedness and disruptiveness. Representation, 52(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2016.1244111

10.

Chilvers

(2008). Deliberating Competence: Theoretical and practitioner perspectives on effective participatory appraisal practice. Science Technology & Human Values, 33(2), 155–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907307594

11.

Dente

(2013). Understanding policy decisions. Springer.

12.

Devillers

Vrydagh

Caluwaerts

Reuchamps

(2021). Looking in from the outside: How do invited but not selected citizens perceive the legitimacy of a minipublic? Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 17(1), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.961

13.

Ebdon

Franklin

A. L.

(2006). Citizen participation in budgeting theory. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 437–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00600.x

14.

Elliott

Heesterbeek

Lukensmeyer

C. J.

Slocum-Bradley

(2006). Participatory methods toolkit. A practitioner’s manual. King Baudouin Fouyndation.

15.

Elstub

Ercan

Mendoça

R. F.

(2016). Editorial introduction: The fourth generation of deliberative democracy. Critical Policy Studies, 10, 139–151.

16.

Ercan

S. A.

Hendriks

C. M.

(2013). The democratic challenges and potential of localism: Insights from deliberative democracy. Policy Studies, 34, 422–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2013.822701

17.

Floridia

(2017). From participation to deliberation. A critical genealogy of deliberative democracy. ECPR Press.

18.

Font

Smith

Galais

Alarcon

(2018). Cherry-picking participation: Explaining the fate of proposals from participatory processes. European Journal of Political Research, 57(3), 615–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12248

19.

Forester

(1999). The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. MIT Press.

20.

Fung

(2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.x

21.

Gastil

Levin

(Ed.) (2005). The deliberative democracy handbook. Strategies for effective civic engagement in the 21st century. Jossey-Bass.

22.

Gastil

Wright

E. O.

(2019). Legislature by lot: Transformative designs for deliberative governance. Verso Books.

23.

Goodin

R. E.

Dryzek

J. S.

(2006). Deliberative impacts: The macro-political uptake of mini-publics. Politics and Society, 34(2), 219–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329206288152

24.

Halfacre

A. C.

Matheny

A. R.

Rosenbaum

W. A.

(2000). Regulating contested local hazards: Is constructive dialogue possible among participants in community risk management? Policy Studies Journal, 28(3), 648–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2000.tb02053.x

25.

Hendriks

(2002). Institutions of deliberative democratic processes and interest groups: Roles, tensions and incentives. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 61(1), 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.00259

26.

Hendriks

C. M.

(2016). Coupling citizens and elites in deliberative systems: The role of institutional design. European Journal of Political Research, 55(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12123

27.

Holzinger

(2000). Limits of co-operation: A German case of environmental mediation. European Environment, 10, 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0976(200011/12)10:6<293::aid-eet240>3.0.co;2-q

28.

Karpowitz

C. F.

Raphael

(2014). Deliberation, democracy, and civic forums: Improving equality and publicity. Cambridge University Press.

29.

Lafont

(2015). Deliberation, participation and democratic legitimacy: Should deliberative minipublics shape public policy? Journal of Political Philosophy, 23(1), 40–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12031

30.

Lewanski

(2013). Institutionalizing deliberative democracy: The ‘Tuscany Laboratory’. Journal of Public Deliberation, 9(1), 1–16. http://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol9/iss1/art10/

31.

Lewanski

Ravazzi

(2017). Innovating public participation. The role of PPPs and institutions in Italy. In Bherer

Gauthier

Simard

(Eds.), The professionalization of the public participation field (pp. 17–39). Routledge.

32.

Lipset

S. M.

(1963). Political Man. Anchor.

33.

McNulty

(2012). An unlikely success: Peru’s top-down participatory budgeting experience. Journal of Public Deliberation, 8(2), 1–19. http://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol8/iss2/art4/

34.

Michels

(2011). Innovations in democratic governance: How does citizen participation contribute to a better democracy? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77, 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311399851

35.

Michels

Binnema

(2018). Deepening and connecting democratic processes. The opportunities and pitfalls of mini-publics in renewing democracy. Social Science, 7, 236. www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/11/236/pdf

36.

Michels

Binnema

(2019). Assessing the impact of deliberative democratic initiatives at the local level: A framework for analysis. Administration & Society, 51(5), 749–769. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399718760588

37.

Murray

Fagan

G. H.

McCusker

(2009). Measuring horizontal governance: A review of public consultation by the Northern Ireland Government between 2000 and 2004. Policy and Politics, 37(4), 553–571. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557309x462556

38.

Niessen

(2019). When citizen deliberation enters real politics: How politicians and stakeholders envision the place of a deliberative mini-public in political decision-making. Policy Sciences, 52(3), 481–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-09346-8

39.

OECD. (2020). Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions. Highlights 2020. https://www.oecd.org/gov/open-government/innovative-citizen-participation-new-democratic-institutions-catching-the-deliberative-wave-highlights.pdf

40.

Parkinson

(2006). Deliberating in the real world. Problems of legitimacy in deliberative democracy. Oxford University Press.

41.

Pogrebinschi

Ryan

(2018). Moving beyond input legitimacy: When do democratic innovations affect policy making? European Journal of Political Research, 57(1), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12219

42.

Pomatto

(2016). Interprétations agonistiques, Dialogiques et élitistes : Participation et conflit dans Trois cas en Italie. Participations, 13(3), 35–61. https://www.cairn.info/journal-participations-2015-3-page-35.htm

43.

Posner

(2004). Law, pragmatism and democracy. Harvard University Press.

44.

Prendiville

(2008). Developing facilitation skills. A handbook for group facilitators. Combat Poverty Agency.

45.

Ravazzi

(2006). Quando I Cittadini decidono. Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche, 2, 61–89.

46.

Ravazzi

(2017). When a government attempts to institutionalize and regulate deliberative democracy: The How and why from a process-tracing perspective. Critical Policy Studies, 11(1), 79–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2016.1159139

47.

Ravazzi

Pomatto

(2014). Flexibility, argumentation and confrontation. How deliberative mini-publics can affect policies on controversial issues. Journal of Public Deliberation, 10(2), 1–23. http://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol10/iss2/art10

48.

Revel

Blatrix

Blondiaux

Fourniau

J.-M.

Lefevre

(Ed.) (2007). Le débat public: Une expérience française de démocratie participative. La Decouverte.

49.

Ryan

Smith

(2014). Defining mini-publics. In Grönlund

Bächtiger

Setälä

(Eds.), Deliberative mini-publics: Involving citizens in the democratic process (pp. 9–26). ECPR Press.

50.

Schwarz

(2016). The skilled facilitator: A comprehensive resource for consultants, facilitators, managers, trainers, and coaches. Wiley.

51.

Setälä

(2017). Connecting deliberative mini-publics to representative decision making. European Journal of Political Research, 56, 846–863. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12207

52.

Smith

(2009). Democratic innovations. Cambridge University Press.

53.

Stewart

(2007). Write the rules and win: Understanding citizen participation game dynamics. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1067–1076. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00798.x

54.

Vrydagh

Caluwaerts

(2020). How do mini-publics affect public policy? Disentangling the influence of a mini-public on public policy using the sequential impact matrix framework. Representation. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2020.1862901

55.

Weisbord

Janoff

(2007). Don’t just do something, stand there!: Ten Principles for Leading Meetings That Matter. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

56.

Young

I. M.

(2000). Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford University Press.