AlisonL.ShortlandN.PalasinskiM.HumannM. (2021). Imagining grim stories to reduce redundant deliberation in critical incident decision-making. Public Money & Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.1969085
2.
BaiocchiG. (2001). Participation, activism, and politics: The Porto Alegre experiment and deliberative democratic theory. Politics & Society, 29(1), 43–72.
3.
BardachE. (2008). A practical guide for policy analysis: the eightfold path to more effective problem solving (3rd ed.). CQ Press.
4.
BeningtonJ. (2011). From private choice to public value. In BeningtonJ.MooreM. (Eds.), Public value: Theory and practice (pp. 31–51). Palgrave Macmillan.
5.
BeningtonJ. (2015). Public value as a contested democratic practice. In BrysonJ.CrosbyB.BloombergL. (Eds.), Creating public value in practice (pp. 29–48). Taylor and Francis.
6.
BeningtonJ.HartleyJ. (2019). Action research to develop the theory and practice of public value as a contested democratic practice. In LindgrenA.Koenig-LewisN.KitchenerM.BrewerM.MooreM.MeynhardtT. (Eds.), Public value: Deepening, enriching, and broadening the theory and practice (pp. 143–158). Routledge.
7.
BeningtonJ.MooreM. (Eds.) (2011a). Public value: Theory and practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
8.
BeningtonJ.MooreM. (2011b). Conclusions: Looking ahead. In BeningtonJ.MooreM. (Eds.), Public value: Theory and practice (pp. 256–274). Palgrave Macmillan.
9.
BeningtonJ.TurbittI. (2007). Policing the Drumcree demonstrations in Northern Ireland: Testing leadership theory in practice. Leadership, 3(4), 371–395.
10.
BrinerR. (2018). Evidence-based management: The basic principles. In BarendsE.RousseauD. (Eds.), Evidence-based management: How to use evidence to make better organizational decisions (pp. 1–19). Kogan Page.
11.
BrinerR. B.DenyerD.RousseauD. M. (2009). Evidence-based management: Concept cleanup time?The Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(4), 19–32.
12.
BrysonJ.SancinoA.BeningtonJ.SørensenE. (2017). Towards a multi-actor theory of public value co-creation. Public Management Review, 19(5), 640–654.
13.
CannonM.EdmondsonA. (2005). Failing to learn and learning to fail (intelligently): How great organizations put failure to work to innovate and improve. Long Range Planning, 38(3), 299–319.
14.
ChivaR.AlegreJ. (2005). Organizational learning and organizational knowledge – towards the integration of two approaches. Management Learning, 36(1), 49–68.
15.
CrickB. (2000). In defence of politics (4th ed.). Chicago University Press.
16.
DahlR. A. (1957). The concept of power. Behavioral Sciences, 2(3), 201–215.
17.
DeweyJ. (1927). The public and its problems. H. Holt & Co.
18.
FoucaultM. (2020). Power: The essential works of Michel Foucault 1954-1984. Penguin.
19.
FungA. (2020). Afterword: Does deliberative democracy have a role in our time of political crisis?Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 16(1), 75–76. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.407
20.
GramsciA. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. International Publishing Company.
21.
HarrisJ.CrootL.ThompsonJ.SpringettJ. (2016). How stakeholder participation can contribute to systematic reviews of complex interventions. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 70(2), 207–214.
22.
HartleyJ. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public Money & Management, 25(1), 27–34.
HartleyJ.ParkerS.BeashelJ. (2019). Leading and recognizing public value. Public Administration, 97(2), 264–278.
25.
HartleyJ.StansfieldA. (2021). Leading through agonistic conflict: Contested sensemaking in national political arenas. Leadership, 17(2), 131–153.
26.
HogwoodB. B.GunnL. (1984). Policy analysis for the real world. Oxford University Press.
27.
IrwinA. (1995). Citizen science: A study of people, expertise and sustainable development. Routledge.
28.
LenaghanJ.NewB.MitchellE. (1996). Setting priorities: is there a role for citizens’ juries?British Medical Journal, 312(7046), 1591–1593.
29.
LewisD. (2020). Mounting evidence suggests coronavirus is airborne — but health advice has not caught up. Nature, 583(7817), 510–513.
30.
LievensF.HarrisonS.MusselP.LitmanJ. (2021). Killing the cat? A review of curiosity at work. The Academy of Management Annals. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2020.0203
31.
LukesS. (2005). Power: A radical view. Red Globe Press.
32.
MooreM. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard University Press.
33.
MouffeC. (1993). The return of the political. Verso.
34.
NonakaI. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.
35.
NutleyS.BoazA.DaviesH.FraserA. (2019). New development: What works now? Continuity and change in the use of evidence to improve public policy and service delivery. Public Money & Management, 39(4), 310–316.
36.
PawsonR.GreenhalghT.HarveyG.WalsheK. (2005). Realist review: A new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10(Suppl. 1), 21–34.
PopperK. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Harper & Row.
39.
RansonS. (2021). Comprehensive education for mutual: A sacred gift to the nation. Forum, 63(1), 39–46.
40.
ReayT.BertaW.KohnM. K. (2009). What’s the evidence on evidence-based management?The Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(4), 5–18.
41.
ReichR. (2018). The common good. Knopf.
42.
RieschH.PotterC. (2014). Citizen science as seen by scientists: Methodological, epistemological and ethical dimensions. Public Understanding of Science, 23(1), 107–120.
43.
SitkinS. B. (1992). Learning through failure: the strategy of small losses. Research in Organizational Behavior, 14, 231–266.
44.
SmithG.WalesC. (2018). Citizens’ juries and deliberative democracy. In Passerin d’EntrèvesM. (Ed.), Democracy as public deliberation (pp. 157–177). Routledge.
45.
TomkinsL.HartleyJ.BristowA. (2020). Asymmetries of leadership: Agency, response and reason. Leadership, 16(1), 87–106.
46.
TorfingJ.TriantafillouP. (Eds.). (2016). Enhancing public innovation by transforming public governance. Cambridge University Press.
47.
WeissC. H. (1979). The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review, 39(5), 426–431.