The rise of right-wing authoritarian populism (RWAP) challenges modern democratic governance and the legitimacy of a career-service, nonpartisan, merit-based public administration—hallmarks of modern democratic institutions. Using citizen survey data collected for the first 2 years of the Trump presidency, this study finds that some core features of RWAP are negatively related to confidence in public administration. Generally speaking, the populist tendency appears to be a significant source of negative affect toward public administration.
AberbachJ.RockmanB. (1990). What has happened to the U.S. senior civil service?The Brookings Review, 8(4), 35–41.
2.
AbromeitJ. (2018). Frankfurt school critical theory and the persistence of authoritarian populism in the United States. In MorelockJ. (Ed.), Critical theory and authoritarian populism (pp. 3–27). University of Westminster Press.
3.
AdlerP.BorysB. (1996). Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling or coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 61–89.
4.
AdornoT.Frenkel-BrunswikE.LevinsonD.SanfordN. (1950). The authoritarian personality. Harper and Row.
5.
AlbertaT. (2019). American carnage: On the front lines of the republican civil war and the rise of President trump. Harper Collins.
BauerM.BeckerS. (2020). Democratic backsliding, populism, and public administration. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 3(1), 19–31.
8.
BerggrenJ.RaeN. (2006). Jimmy Carter and George W. Bush: Faith, foreign policy, and an evangelical presidential style. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 36(4), 606–632.
9.
BizumicB.DuckittJ. (2012). What is and is not ethnocentrism? A conceptual analysis and political implications. Political Psychology, 33(6), 887–909.
10.
BonikowskiB. (2017). Ethno-nationalist populism and the mobilization of collective resentment. British Journal of Sociology, 68(Suppl. 1), S181–S213.
11.
BoydH. (2008). Obama and the media. The Black Scholar, 38(4), 11–18.
12.
BradburyM.KelloughJ. E. (2011). Representative bureaucracy: Assessing the evidence of active representation. American Review of Public Administration, 41(2), 157–167.
13.
BrysonJ.CrosbyB. C.BloombergL. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445–456.
14.
Canetti-NisimD. (2004). The effect of religiosity on endorsement of democratic values: The mediating influence of authoritarianism. Political Behavior, 26(4), 377–398.
15.
ChouM. (2014). China’s new authoritarianism: A glimpse at our post-democratic future? In ChouM. (Ed.), Democracy against itself: Sustaining an unsustainable idea (pp. 110–138). Edinburgh University Press.
16.
ChoudhuryE. (2008). Trust in administration: An integrative approach to optimal trust. Administration and Society, 40(6), 586–620.
17.
CizmarA. M.LaymanG. C.McTagueJ.Pearson-MerkowitzS.SpiveyM. (2014). Authoritarianism and American political behavior, 1952–2008. Political Research Quarterly, 67(1), 71–83.
18.
CookB. (2021). The fourth branch: Reconstructing the administrative state for the commercial republic. University of Kansas Press.
19.
CookK. S.HardinR.LeviM. (2005). Cooperation without trust. Russell Sage Foundation Press.
20.
CooperC. A.KnottsH. G.BrennanK. (2008). The importance of trust in government in public administration. Public Administration Review, 68(4), 459–468.
21.
CooperC. A.ReinagelT. P. (2015). The limits of public service motivation: Confidence in government institutions among public servants. Administration & Society, 49(9), 1297–1317.
22.
DahlR. (1956). A preface to democratic theory. University of Chicago Press.
23.
DahlR. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. Yale University Press.
24.
DeslatteA. (2020). The erosion of trust during a global pandemic and how public administrators should counter it. American Review of Public Administration, 50(6–7), 489–496.
25.
DunwoodyP. T.PlaneD. L. (2019). The influence of authoritarianism and outgroup threat on political affiliations and support for antidemocratic policies. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 25(3), 198–210.
26.
DurantR. (1999). Missing links? Civic trust: Civic capital, and public administration. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 5(2), 135–144.
27.
EliasN. (2013). Shifting diversity perspectives and new avenues for representative bureaucracy. Public Administration Quarterly, 37(3), 331–372.
28.
EllisC.StimsonJ. (2012). Ideology in America. Cambridge University Press.
29.
EskhardtW. (1991). Authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 12(1), 97–124.
30.
FredricksonH. G. (1996). Comparing the reinventing government movement with the new public administration. Public Administration Review, 56(3), 263–270.
FuchsC. (2018b). Digital demagogue: Authoritarian capitalism in the age of Trump and Twitter. Pluto Press.
33.
GandeshaS. (2018). Understanding right and left populism. In MorelockJ. (Ed.), Critical theory and authoritarian populism (pp. 49–70). University of Westminster Press.
34.
GarrettR. S.ThurberJ.FritschlerA. L.RosenbloomD. (2006). Assessing the impact of bureaucracy bashing by electoral campaigns. Public Administration Review, 66(2), 228–240.
GiraudM. (1987). The distracted look: Ethnocentricism, xenophobia, or racism?Dialectical Anthropology, 12(4), 413–419.
37.
GirouxH. (2011). Barack Obama and the resurgent specter of authoritarianism. A Journal of Composition Theory, 31(3/4), 415–440.
38.
GoodsellC. (2003). The case for bureaucracy: A public administration polemic. CQ Press.
39.
GoodsellC. (2019). The anti-public administration presidency: The damage Trump has wrought. American Review of Public Administration, 49(8), 871–883.
40.
GreenR. (2012). Plutocracy, bureaucracy, and the end of public trust. Administration and Society, 44(1), 109–143.
41.
GreenR. (2019). Alexander Hamilton’s public administration. University of Alabama Press.
42.
HavercroftJ.MurphyJ. (2018). Is the tea party libertarian, authoritarian, or something else?Social Science Quarterly, 99(3), 1021–1037.
43.
HawkinsK.KaltwasserC. (2017). The ideational approach to populism. Latin American Research Review, 52(4), 513–528.
44.
HerianM. N.ShankN. C.Abdel-MonemR. L. (2014). Trust in government and support for governmental regulation: The case of electronic health records. Health Expectations, 17, 784–794.
45.
HetheringtonM. (2005). Why trust matters: Declining political trust and demise of American liberalism. Princeton University Press.
HinderaJ. (1993). Representative bureaucracy: Further evidence of active representation in the EEOC district offices. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(4), 415–429.
48.
HitlinS. (2006). Parental influences on children’s values and aspirations: Bridging two theories of social class and socialization. Sociological Perspectives, 49(1), 25–46.
49.
HoffmanJ. (2004). Citizenship beyond the State. SAGE.
50.
HoustonD.AitalievaN.MorelockA.ShultsC. (2016). Citizen trust in civil servants: A cross-national examination. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(14), 1203–1214.
51.
HugheyM. (2014). The wrongs of the right: Language, race, and the republican party in the age of Obama. NYU Press.
52.
IssacJ. (2012). Authoritarianism, elections, and democracy?Perspectives on Politics, 10(4), 863–866.
53.
IssacJ. (2018). Against Trump: Notes from year one. OR Books.
54.
JacobsonG. (2016). Polarization, gridlock, and presidential campaign politics in 2016. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 667, 226–246.
55.
JacobyW. (1991). Ideological identification and issue attitudes. American Journal of Political Science, 35(1), 178–205.
56.
KamenskyJ. (1996). Role of the “reinventing government” movement in federal management reform. Public Administration Review, 56(3), 247–255.
57.
KampenJ.Van De WalleS.BouckaertG. (2006). Assessing the relation between satisfaction with public service delivery and trust in government: The impact of the predisposition of citizens towards government on evaluations of its performance. Public Performance & Management Review, 29(4), 387–404.
58.
KassH. (1996). The logics of trust: The foundational role of institutions in building social trust. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 18(2), 57–73.
59.
KeeleL. (2006). Social capital and the dynamics of trust in government. American Journal of Political Science, 51(2), 241–254.
60.
KennedyA.BishuS.HecklerN. (2020). Feminism, masculinity, and active representation: A gender analysis of representative bureaucracy. Administration & Society, 5(7), 1101–1130.
61.
KimS. (2005). The role of trust in the modern administrative state. Administration and Society, 37(5), 611–635.
62.
KivistoP. (2017). The Trump phenomenon: How the politics of populism won in 2016. Emerald.
63.
LandemoreH. (2018). What does it mean to take diversity seriously? On open-mindedness as a civic virtue. Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy, 16, 795–806.
64.
LeviM. (1998). A state of trust. In BraithwaiteV.LeviM. (Eds.), Trust and governance (pp. 77–101). Russell Sage Foundation Press.
65.
LevtiskyS.ZiblattD. (2018). How democracies die. Penguin Random House.
66.
LovrichN.NeimanM. (1984). Public choice theory in public administration: An annotated bibliography [Garland Reference Book Series in Public Administration]. Garland Press.
67.
LowiT. (1993). Legitimizing public administration: A disturbed dissent. Public Administration Review, 53(3), 261–264.
68.
LynnL. (2009). Restoring the rule of law to public administration: What Frank Goodnow got right and what Leonard White didn’t. Public Administration Review, 69(5), 803–812.
69.
McAllisterT. V. (1996). Revolt against modernity: Leo Strauss, Eric Vogelin, and the search for a post-liberal order. University of Kansas Press.
70.
McGregorE. (1983). The public-service problem. Annals of American Academy of Political and Social Science, 466, 61–76.
71.
MacWilliamsM. (2016). Who decides when the party doesn’t? Authoritarian voters and the rise of Donald Trump. Political Science and Politics, 49(4), 712–721.
72.
MeierK.Nicholson-CrottyJ. (2006). Representative bureaucracy, and law enforcement: The case of sexual assault. Public Administration Review, 66(6), 850–860.
73.
MilburnM.ConradS. (1996). The politics of denial. MIT Press.
74.
MilburnM.ConradS. (2016). Raised to rage: The Politics of anger and the roots of authoritarianism. MIT Press.
75.
MinniteL. (2012). New challenges in the study of right-wing propaganda: Priming the populist backlash to “hope and change.”New Political Science, 34(4), 506–526.
76.
MorganD. (1984). Terminal flight: The air traffic controllers’ strike of 1981. Journal of American Studies, 18(2), 165–183.
77.
MosherF. (1968). Democracy and the public service. Oxford University Press.
78.
MuddeC. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press.
79.
MuddeC.KaltwasserC. (2012). Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or corrective for democracy?Cambridge University Press.
80.
MuddeC.KaltwasserC. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
81.
MüllerJ. W. (2016). What is populism?University of Pennsylvania Press.
82.
NewboldS. (2011). Federalist no. 27: Is transparency essential for public confidence in government?Public Administration Review, 71(Suppl. 1), S47–S52.
83.
NorrisP.InglehartR. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press.
84.
O’LearyR.Van SlykeD.KimS. (2010). The future of public administration around the world: The Minnowbrook perspective. Georgetown University Press.
85.
OstromV.AllenB. (2007). The intellectual crisis in American public administration. University of Alabama Press.
86.
PetersB. G.PierreJ. (2019). Populism and public administration: Confronting the administrative state. Administration & Society, 51(10), 1521–1545.
87.
PetersB. G.von MaravicP.SchröterE. (2015). Politics of representative bureaucracy: Power, legitimacy, and performance. Edward Elgar.
88.
PfiffnerJ. (1990). Establishing the Bush presidency. Public Administration Review, 50(1), 64–73.
89.
PitlikH.KoubaL. (2015). Does social distrust always lead to stronger support for government intervention?Public Choice, 163(3/4), 355–377.
90.
PopperK. (2013). The open society and its enemies. Princeton University Press.
91.
PutnamR. (1993). Making democracy work: Civil traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
92.
PutnamR. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
93.
PutzelJ. (2020). The “populist” right challenge to neoliberalism: Social policy between a rock and a hard place. Development and Change, 51(2), 418–441.
94.
QuahJ. S. T. (2013). Ensuring good governance in Singapore: Is this experience transferable to other Asian countries?International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26(5), 401–420.
95.
RiveraM.WardJ. (2008). Employment equity an institutional commitments to diversity: Disciplinary perspectives from public administration and public affairs education. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 14(1), 9–20.
96.
RockmanB. (2019). Bureaucracy between populism and technocracy. Administration & Society, 51(10), 1546–1575.
97.
RohacD.KumarS.HeinoA. (2017). The wisdom of demagogues: Institutions, corruption, and support for authoritarian populists. Economic Affairs, 37(3), 382–396.
98.
RohrJ. (1986). To run a constitution: The legitimacy of the administrative state. University Press of Kansas.
99.
RosenbloomD. (1983). Public administrative theory and the separation of powers. Public Administration Review, 43(3), 219–227.
100.
RosenbloomD. (2000). Retrofitting the administrative state to the constitution: Congress and the judiciary’s twentieth century progress. Public Administration Review, 60(1), 39–46.
101.
RoyD. (1994). Singapore, China, and the “soft authoritarian” challenge. Asian Survey, 34(3), 231–242.
102.
RudolphT.EvansJ. (2005). Political trust, ideology, and public support for government spending. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 660–671.
103.
RuscioK. (1996). Trust, democracy, and public management: A theoretical argument. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(3), 461–477.
104.
SchachterH.MorganD.KirwanK.RohrJ.RosenbloomD.SchaeferD. (2010). Recovering, restoring, and renewing the foundations of American public administration. Public Administration Review, 70(4), 621–633.
105.
SchweikC.MergelI.SandfortJ.ZhaoZ. (2011). Toward open public administration scholarship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(Suppl. 1), i175–i198.
SkocpolT.WilliamsonV. (2012). The tea party and the remaking of republican conservatism. Oxford University Press.
108.
SkowronekS. (2006). The reassociation of ideas and purposes: Racism, liberalism, and the American political tradition. American Political Science Review, 100(3), 385–401.
109.
SoltF. (2012). The social origins of authoritarianism. Political Research Quarterly, 65(4), 703–713.
110.
SpicerM.TerryL. (1993). Legitimacy, history, and logic: Public administration and the constitution. Public Administration Review, 53(3), 239–246.
111.
StarkeA.HecklerN.MackeyJ. (2018). Administrative racism: Public administration education and race. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 24(4), 469–489.
112.
StewartJ. (2019). Deep state: Trump, the FBI, and the rule of law. Penguin Press.
113.
StiversC. (2000). Bureau men and settlement women: Constructing public administration in the progressive era. University Press of Kansas.
114.
ThielemannG.StewartJ. (1996). A demand-side perspective on the importance of representative bureaucracy: AIDS, ethnicity, gender, and sexual orientation. Public Administration Review, 56(2), 168–173.
115.
ThomasC. (1998). Maintaining and restoring public trust in government agencies and their employees. Administration and Society, 30(2), 166–193.
116.
TolbertC. J.MossbergerK. (2006). The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 354–369.
117.
TullockG. (1965). The politics of bureaucracy. Public Affairs Press.
118.
TurekL. (2014). Religious rhetoric and the evolution of George W. Bush’s political philosophy. Journal of American Studies, 48(4), 975–998.
119.
UslanerE. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge University Press.
120.
Van de WalleS.RoosbroekS.BouckaertG. (2008). Trust in the public sector: Is there any evidence for a long-term decline?International Review of Administrative Sciences, 74(1), 47–64.
121.
Van RyzinG. (2011). Outcomes, process, and trust of civil servants. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(4), 745–760.
122.
VentrissC.PerryJ.NabatchiT.MilwardH. B.JohnstonJ. (2019). Democracy, public administration, and public values in the era of estrangement. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 2(4), 275–282.
123.
WaldoD. (1948). Administrative state. Ronald Press.
124.
WilkinsV.KeiserL. (2006). Linking passive and active representation by gender: The case of child support agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 87–102.
125.
YackeeS.LoweryD. (2006). Understanding public support for the U.S. Federal bureaucracy: A macro politics view. Public Management Review, 7(4), 515–536.
126.
YangK.HolzerM. (2006). The performance-trust link: Implications for performance measurement. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 114–126.
127.
ZmerliS.NewtonK. (2008). Social trust and attitudes toward democracy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(4), 706–724.
