The financial crisis has made the theme of economic development particularly significant. Analysis of this topic cannot ignore a key actor, that is, public administration. Here, we focus on all the Italian municipalities (n = 7,978), analyzing the relationship between local public policies (in terms of municipalities’ governance and local governments’ financial engagement) supporting urban economic development and local entrepreneurial presence (total number of active firms). Applying the general least square (GLS) method for over 4 years (2014–2017; n = 31,912 observations), we find that the financial autonomy of cities and their financial efforts toward international programs, agriculture, agri-food and fisheries, tourism, culture, and economic development policies favor entrepreneurial presence. Our conclusion, contributing to public management and policy literature, also highlights some limits of the research and some related opportunities for further research on the subject.
AbdelgalilE. A.CohenS. I. (2007). Economic development and resources degradation: Conflicts and policies. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 41, 107–129.
2.
AcemogluD.JohnsonS.RobinsonJ. A. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 91, 1369–1401.
3.
AcsZ. J.AstebroT.AudretschD.RobinsonD. T. (2016). Public policy to promote entrepreneurship: A call to arms. Small Business Economics, 47, 35–51.
4.
AcsZ. J.MorckR. K.YeungB. (2001). Entrepreneurship, globalization and public policy. Journal of International Management, 7(3), 235–251.
5.
AcsZ. J.SzerbL. (2007). Entrepreneurship, economic growth and public policy. Small Business Economics, 28, 109–122.
6.
AdamsC. A.MuirS.HoqueZ. (2014). Measurement of sustainability performance in the public sector. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 5(1), 46–67.
7.
AminA. (1999). An institutionalist perspective on regional economic development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23, 365–378.
8.
AngiolaN.BianchiP. (2015). Public managers’ skills development for effective performance management: Empirical evidence from italian local governments. Public Management Review, 17(4), 517–542.
9.
AnselinL.Lozano-GraciaN. (2008). Errors in variables and spatial effects in hedonic house price models of ambient air quality. Empirical Economics, 34(1), 5–34.
10.
AudretschD. B.KeilbachM. (2004). Entrepreneurship capital and economic performance. Regional Studies, 38(8), 949–959.
11.
BaileyS. J. (1993). Public choice theory and the reform of local government in Britain: From government to governance. Public Policy and Administration, 8(2), 7–24.
12.
Balaguer-CollM. T.PriorD.Tortosa-AusinE. (2016). On the determinants of local government debt: Does one size fit all?International Public Management Journal, 19(4), 513–542.
13.
Balaguer-CollM. T.PriorD.Tortosa-AusinaE. (2010). Devolution dynamics of Spanish local government. Environment and Planning A, 42, 1476–1495.
14.
BallA.GrubnicS.BirchallJ. (2014). Sustainability accounting and accountability in the public sector. In BebbingtonJ.UnermanJ.O’DwyerB. (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability (2nd ed., pp. 176–196). Routledge.
15.
BaltagiB. H.EggerP.PfaffermayrM. (2008). Estimating regional trade agreement effects on FDI in an interdependent world. Journal of Econometrics, 145, 94–208.
16.
BebbingtonJ. (1997). Engagement, education and sustainability. A review essay on environmental accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 10(3), 365–379.
17.
BebbingtonJ.UnermanJ. (2018). Achieving the United Nations sustainable development goals. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(1), 2–24.
18.
BlackburnW. R. (2012). The sustainability handbook: The complete management guide to achieving social, economic and environmental responsibility. Routledge.
19.
BoyneG. A. (1996). Competition and local government: A public choice perspective. Urban Studies, 33(4–5), 703–721.
20.
BoyneG. A. (1997). Public choice theory and local government structure: An evaluation of reorganization in Scotland and Wales. Local Government Studies, 23(3), 56–72.
21.
BoyneG. A. (1998). Public choice theory and local government. Palgrave Macmillan.
22.
BrunssonN.Sahlin-AnderssonK. (2000). Constructing organizations: The example of the public sector reform. Organization Studies, 21(4), 721–746.
23.
BuchananJ. M.TollisonR. D. (1984). The theory of public choice—II. University of Michigan Press.
24.
BurrittR. L.SchalteggerS. (2010). Sustainability accounting and reporting: Fad or trend?Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(7), 829–846.
25.
CalcagniniG.PeruginiF. (2019). Social capital and well-being in the Italian provinces. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 68, 1–10.
26.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Suppl.), S95–S120.
27.
De MatteisF.PreiteD. (2017). The citizens’ report as tool of financial accountability for local government. In Cuadrado-BallesterosB.Garcia-SanchezI. M. (Eds.), Local government in the digital era: Looking for accountability. Nova Science Publishers. pp. 33–53.
28.
De MatteisF.PreiteD.StrianiF.BorgonoviE. (2021). Cities’ role in environmental sustainability policy: The Italian experience. Cities, 111, 102991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102991
29.
Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. (2004). Integrating economic and environmental policies: The case of Pacific Island countries (Development Papers N. 25). United Nations.
30.
ErhardtN. L.WerbelJ. D.ShraderC. B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance International Review, 11, 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00011
31.
GranovetterM. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
32.
GrimmH. (2009). Creating an entrepreneurial economy: The role of public policy In AcsZ.AudretschD.StromR. (Eds.), Entrepreneurship, goals and public policy (pp. 299–318). Cambridge University Press.
33.
HallR. E.JonesC. I. (1999). Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others?The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 83–116.
34.
HsiaoC. (2003). Analysis of panel data. Cambridge University Press.
35.
Italian National Institute of Statistics. (2018). Enterprises and persons employed. http://dati.istat.it/
36.
Italian National Institute of Statistics. (2019). Rapporto annuale 2019. La situazione del Paese [Country Annual Report 2019]. www.istat.it
37.
KatircioğluS.ZabolotnovA. (2020). Role of financial development in economic globalization: Evidence from global panel. Applied Economics Letters, 27(5), 371–377.
38.
KreftS. F.SobelR. S. (2005). Public policy, entrepreneurship, and economic freedom. Cato Journal, 25(3), 595–616.
39.
MbakuJ. M. (2008). Corruption cleanups in Africa: Lessons from public choice theory. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 43(4), 427–456.
40.
MeierK. J.O’TooleL. J. (2002). Public management and organizational performance: The effect of managerial quality. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21(4), 629–643.
41.
MonkamN. F. (2014). Local municipality productive efficiency and its determinants in South Africa. Development Southern Africa, 31(2), 275–298.
42.
NamiseE. Y.ZhuangJ.ZhuF. (2019). The relation between entrepreneurship and rural poverty alleviation in China. Management Decision, 57(9), 2593–2611.
43.
PergelovaA.Angulo-RuizF. (2014). The impact of government financial support on the performance of new firms: The role of competitive advantage as an intermediate outcome. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 26(9–10), 663–705.
44.
PollittC.BouckaertG. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press.
45.
PreussL. (2011). On the contribution of public procurement to entrepreneurship and small business policy. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 23(9–10), 787–814.
46.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
47.
RickelsW.DovernJ.QuaasM. (2016). Beyond fisheries: Common-pool resource problems in oceanic resources and services. Global Environmental Change, 40, 37–49.
48.
Rodríguez-PoseA.GarcilazoE. (2015). Quality of government and the returns of investment: Examining the impact of cohesion expenditure in European regions. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1274–1290.
49.
RodrikD.SubramanianF.TrebbiF. (2004). Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9, 131–165.
50.
SimõesP.MarquesR. C. (2012). On the economic performance of the waste sector: A literature review. Journal of Environmental Management, 106, 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.04.005
51.
SinghS. K.GaurS. S. (2018). Entrepreneurship and innovation management in emerging economies. Management Decision, 56, 2–5.
52.
SpangenbergJ. H. (2005). Economic sustainability of the economy: Concepts and indicators. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1–2), 47–64.
53.
SpencerJ.GomezC. (2004). The relationship among national institutional structures, economic factors, and domestic entrepreneurial activity: A multicountry study. Journal of Business Research, 57, 1098–1107.
54.
TolbaM. K. (1997). Sustainable development: Constraints and opportunities. Butterworths.
55.
WarnerM.HebdonR. (2001). Local government restructuring: Privatization and its alternatives. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20(2), 315–336.
56.
WongP. K.HoY. P.AutioE. (2005). Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: Evidence from GEM data. Small Business Economics, 24, 335–350.
57.
ZhangW.CooperW. W.DengH.ParkerB. R.RuelfiT. W. (2010). Entrepreneurial talent and economic development in China. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 44, 178–192.
