Knowability is the ability to identify a preferable course of action with sufficient confidence to justify adopting that course. This article shows it is not possible to judge the value of a public value proposition with sufficient confidence to justify the use of public authority. The indeterminacy of public value is shown by demonstrating that the necessary conditions to justify a public value proposition include that the evidence sustaining it is not impossible, circular, or unsubstantiated opinion. Those criteria are applied to an exhaustive set of possible concepts of public value, all of which fail at least one of those conditions so public value is unknowable. The implication is not that government is impossible, but that it requires humility, discourse, and compromise.
AcemogluD.RobinsonJ. A. (2013). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity and poverty. Profile Books.
2.
ArielyD. (2012). The (honest) truth about dishonesty. Harper.
3.
ArrowK. (1950). A difficulty in the concept of social welfare. The Journal of Political Economy, 58(4), 328–346.
4.
AtkinsonA. (1970). On the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, 2(3), 244–263.
5.
BeningtonJ. (2009). Creating the public in order to create public value?International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3–4), 232–249.
6.
BeningtonJ. (2011). From private choice to public value? In BeningtonJ.MooreM. H. (Eds.), Public value: Theory and practice (pp. 31–51). Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
BeningtonJ.MooreM. H. (2011). Public value in complex and changing times. In BeningtonJ.MooreM. H. (Eds.), Public value: Theory and practice (pp. 1–30). Palgrave Macmillan.
8.
BohmanJ.RichardsonH. S. (2009). Liberalism, deliberative democracy, and “reasons that all can accept.”Journal of Political Philosophy, 17(3), 253–274.
9.
BrennanG. (2001). Collective coherence?International Review of Law and Economics, 21(2), 197–211.
10.
BrysonJ. M.CrosbyB. C.BloombergL. (Eds.). (2015). Public value and public administration. Georgetown University Press.
11.
CluleyV.RadnorZ. (2020). Progressing the conceptualization of value co-creation in public service organizations. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 3(3), 211–221.
12.
ConklinJ. (2005). Dialogue mapping: Building shared understanding of wicked problems. Wiley.
DeweyJ. (1927). The public and its problems. Allen & Unwin.
15.
DjiksterhuisA.van OldenZ. (2006). On the benefits of thinking unconsciously: Unconscious thought can increase post-choice satisfaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 627–631.
16.
DurkheimE. (1982). The rules of sociological method. In LukesS. (Ed.), The rules of sociological method and selected texts on sociology and its method (HallsW. D., Trans., pp. 31–163). MacMillan. (Originally published 1895)
17.
FfordeA. (2019). Yes, but what about the authority of policy analysts?Policy Sciences, 52, 153–169.
18.
FowlerL. (2020). How to implement policy: Coping with ambiguity and uncertainty. Public Administration. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12702
19.
GeuijenK.MooreM. H.CederquistA.RonningR.van TwistM. (2017). Creating public value in global wicked problems. Public Management Review, 19(5), 621–639.
20.
GrahamJ.NosekB.HaidtJ.IyerR.KolevaS.DittoP. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385.
21.
GrimmelikhuijsenS.JilkeS.OlsenA. L.TummersL. (2017). Behavioral public administration: Combining insights from public administration and psychology. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 45–56.
22.
GulickL. (1937). Science, values and public administration. In GulickL.UrwickL. (Eds.), Papers on the science of administration (pp. 189–195). Institute of Public Administration.
23.
HaidtJ. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Vintage Books.
24.
HarsanyiJ. (1978). Bayesian decision theory and utilitarian ethics. American Economic Review, 68(2), 223–228.
25.
HartleyJ.AlfordJ.KniesE.DouglasS. (2017). Towards an empirical research agenda for public value theory. Public Management Review, 19(5), 670–685.
26.
HeadB. W. (2008). Wicked problems in public policy. Public Policy, 3(2), 101–118.
27.
HeadB. W.AlfordJ. (2015). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration & Society, 47(6), 711–739.
28.
IJzermanH.LewisN. A.Jr.PrzybylskiA. K.WeinsteinN.DeBruineL.RitchieS. J.VazireS.ForscherP. S.MoreyR. D.IvoryJ. D.AnvariF. (2020). Use caution when applying behavioural science to policy. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1092–1094.
29.
KahnemanD. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Penguin.
30.
KirkhamR. L. (1992). Theories of truth: A critical introduction. Bradford Book, MIT Press.
31.
KroeberA. L. (1915). Eighteen professions. American Anthropologist, 17(2), 283–288.
32.
LarmoreC. (2005). Respect for persons. The Hedgehog Review, 7(2), 66–76.
33.
LazarusR. J. (2009). Super wicked problems and climate change: Restraining the present to liberate the future. Cornell Law Review, 94, 1153–1233.
34.
Le GrandJ.BartlettW (Eds.). (1993). Quasi-markets and social policy. Macmillan.
35.
ListC.PettitP. (2002). Aggregating sets of judgments: An impossibility result. Economics and Philosophy, 18(1), 89–110.
36.
McCreaA. M. (2020). Can administrative capacity address wicked problems? Evidence from the frontlines of the American opioid crisis. Administration & Society, 52(7), 983–1008.
37.
MeynhardtT. (2009). Public value inside: What is public value creation?International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3–4), 192–219.
38.
MintromM.LuetjensJ. (2017). Creating public value: Tightening connections between policy design and public management. Policy Studies Journal, 45(1), 170–190.
39.
MooreM. H. (1995). Creating public value. Harvard University Press.
40.
MooreM. H. (2013). Recognizing public value. Harvard University Press.
41.
MooreM. H. (2014). Public value accounting: Establishing the philosophical basis. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 465–477.
42.
MooreM. H. (2015). Creating a public value account and scorecard. In BrysonJ. M.CrosbyB. C.BloombergL. (Eds.), Public value and public administration (pp. 110–130). Georgetown University Press.
43.
MulganG. (2011). Effective supply and demand and the measurement of public and social value. In BenningtonJ.MooreM. (Eds.), Public value: Theory and practice (pp. 212–224). Palgrave Macmillan.
44.
NagelT. (1986). The view from nowhere. Oxford University Press.
45.
NoordegraafM.DouglasS.GeuijenK.van der SteenM. (2019). Weaknesses of wickedness: A critical perspective on wickedness theory. Policy and Society, 38:2, 278–297.
46.
PeschU.VermaasP. (2020). The wickedness of Rittel and Webber’s dilemmas. Administration & Society, 52(6), 960–979.
47.
PetersB. G. (2017). What is so wicked about wicked problems? A conceptual analysis and a research program. Policy and Society, 36(3), 385–396.
48.
RittelH. W. J.WebberM. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.
49.
RobertsN. M. (2000). Wicked problems and network approaches to resolution. International Public Management Review, 1(1), 1–19.
50.
RooneyD.McKennaB. (2008). Wisdom in public administration: Looking for a sociology of wise practice. Public Administration Review, 68(4), 709–721.
51.
ScanlonT. (1998). What we owe to each other. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
52.
SenA. (2010). The idea of justice. Penguin Books.
53.
SimonH. (1973). The structure of ill-structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4, 181–201.
54.
SpicerM. W. (2001). Value pluralism and its implications for American public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 23(4), 507–528.
55.
TermeerC. J. A. M.DewulfA.BiesbroekR. (2019). A critical assessment of the wicked problem concept: Relevance and usefulness for policy science and practice. Policy and Society, 38(2), 167–179.
56.
TermeerC. J. A. M.DewulfA.BreemanG.StillerS. J. (2015). Governance capabilities for dealing wisely with wicked problems. Administration and Society, 47(6), 680–710.
57.
WilliamsB. (2005). In the beginning was the deed: Realism and moralism in political argument (HawthornG., Ed., and Selected). Princeton University Press.
