This study utilizes the Strategic Action Field (SAF) framework as a lens to study implementation effectiveness of Ohio START, a multiactor and multilevel implementation process. We examine the extent to which perceptions of successes and challenges vary across organizational roles in county-level child welfare agencies during Ohio START implementation. Preliminary findings reveal that perceptions of implementation effectiveness differ based on organizational role.
AaronsG. A.PalinkasL. A. (2007). Implementation of evidence-based practice in child welfare: Service provider perspectives. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 34(4), 411–419.
2.
AaronsG. A.WellsR. S.ZagurskyK.FettesD. L.PalinkasL. A. (2009). Implementing evidence-based practice in community mental health agencies: A multiple stakeholder analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 99(11), 2087–2095.
3.
AgranoffR. (1991). Human services integration: Past and present challenges in public administration. Public Administration Review, 51(6), 533–542.
AustinM. J.CiaassenJ. (2008). Implementing evidence-based practice in human service organizations: Preliminary lessons from the frontlines. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 5(1–2), 271–293.
6.
AustinM. J.JohnsonM. A.ChowJ. C. C.De MarcoA.KetchV. (2009). Delivering welfare-to-work services in county social service organizations: An exploratory study of staff perspectives. Administration in Social Work, 33(1), 105–126.
7.
BäckA.von Thiele SchwarzU.HassonH.RichterA. (2020). Aligning perspectives? Comparison of top and middle-level managers’ views on how organization influences implementation of evidence-based practice. The British Journal of Social Work, 50(4), 1126–1145.
8.
BaxterP.JackS. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559.
9.
BishopS. W. (2003). Welfare reform from the inside out: Implementing the Missouri families-mutual responsibility demonstration plan. Administration & Society, 35(5), 597–628.
10.
BoskE. A.ParisR.HansonK. E.RuisardD.SuchmanN. E. (2019). Innovations in child welfare interventions for caregivers with substance use disorders and their children. Children and Youth Services Review, 101, 99–112.
11.
BungerA. C.Lengnick-HallR. (2019). Implementation science and human service organizations research: Opportunities and challenges for building on complementary strengths. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 43(4), 258–268.
CaoY.BungerA. C.HoffmanJ.RobertsonH. A. (2016). Change communication strategies in public child welfare organizations: Engaging the front line. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 40(1), 37–50.
14.
CareyG.DickinsonH.MalbonE.WeierM.DuffG. (2020). Burdensome administration and its risks: Competing logics in policy implementation. Administration & Society, 52(9), 1362–1381.
15.
CarnochanS.AustinM. J. (2002). Implementing welfare reform and guiding organizational change. Administration in Social Work, 26(1), 61–77.
16.
CarnochanS.McBeathB.AustinM. J. (2017). Managerial and frontline perspectives on the process of evidence-informed practice within human service organizations. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 41(4), 346–358.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.
20.
DrabbleL. (2010). Advancing collaborative practice between substance abuse treatment and child welfare fields: What helps and hinders the process?Administration in Social Work, 35(1), 88–106.
21.
FeldmanM. S. (2000). Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11(6), 611–629.
22.
FligsteinN.McAdamD. (2011). Toward a general theory of strategic action fields. Sociological Theory, 29(1), 1–26.
GarciaA. R.MyersC.MoronesS.OheneS.KimM. (2020). “It starts from the top”: Caseworkers, supervisors, and TripleP providers’ perceptions of implementation processes and contexts. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 4(3), 266–293.
25.
GazleyB. (2017). The current state of interorganizational collaboration: Lessons for human service research and management. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 41(1), 1–5.
26.
GirthA. M. (2017). Incentives in third-party governance: Management practices and accountability implications. Public Administration Review, 77(3), 433–444.
27.
GivenL. M. (Ed.). (2008). The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. SAGE.
28.
GlissonC.JamesL. R. (2002). The cross-level effects of culture and climate in human service teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 23(6), 767–794.
29.
HancockD. R.AlgozzineB. (2017). Doing case study research: A practical guide for beginning researchers (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
30.
HasenfeldY. (2009). Human services as complex organizations (2nd ed.). SAGE.
31.
HillM.HupeP. (2014). Implementing public policy: An introduction to the study of operational governance (3rd ed.). SAGE.
32.
HovmandP. S.GillespieD. F. (2010). Implementation of evidence-based practice and organizational performance. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 37(1), 79–94.
33.
HuebnerR. A.WillauerT.PoszeL.HallM. T.OliverJ. (2015). Application of the evaluation framework for program improvement of START. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 9(1), 42–64.
34.
HuebnerR. A.YoungN. K.HallM. T.PoszeL.WillauerT. (2017). Serving families with child maltreatment and substance use disorders: A decade of learning. Journal of Family Social Work, 20(4), 288–305.
JohnstonJ. M.RomzekB. S. (2008). Social welfare contracts as networks: The impact of network stability on management and performance. Administration & Society, 40(2), 115–146.
37.
LeeE.EsakiN.GreeneR. (2009). Collocation: Integrating child welfare and substance abuse services. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 9(1), 55–70.
38.
LeRouxK.PiatakJ.RomzekB.JohnstonJ. (2019). Informal accountability in children’s service networks: The role of frontline workers. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 43(3), 188–204.
39.
LipskyM. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service (3rd ed.). Russell Sage Foundation.
40.
LynnL. E.Jr.HeinrichC. J.HillC. J. (2000). Studying governance and public management: Challenges and prospects. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 233–262.
41.
LynnL. E.Jr.HeinrichC. J.HillC. J. (2001). Improving governance: A new logic for empirical research. Georgetown University Press.
42.
MarshJ. C.SmithB. D.BruniM. (2011). Integrated substance abuse and child welfare services for women: A progress review. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(3), 466–472.
43.
MayP. J.WinterS. C. (2009). Politicians, managers, and street-level bureaucrats: Influences on policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 453–476.
44.
Maynard-MoodyS.MushenoM. (2000). State agent or citizen agent: Two narratives of discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 329–358.
45.
Maynard-MoodyS.MushenoM. (2012). Social equities and inequities in practice: Street-level workers as agents and pragmatists. Public Administration Review, 72(s1), S16–S23.
46.
McBeathB.ChuangE.CarnochanS.AustinM. J.StuartM. (2019). Service coordination by public sector managers in a human service contracting environment. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 46(2), 115–127.
47.
McBeathB.Collins-CamargoC.ChuangE.WellsR.BungerA. C.JollesM. P. (2014). New directions for research on the organizational and institutional context of child welfare agencies: Introduction to the symposium on “The Organizational and Managerial Context of Private Child Welfare Agencies.”Children and Youth Services Review, 38, 83–92.
48.
MeyerJ. W.RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
49.
MeyersM. K.GlaserB.DonaldK. M. (1998). On the front lines of welfare delivery: Are workers implementing policy reforms?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17(1), 1–22.
50.
MeyersM. K.RiccucciN. M.LurieI. (2001). Achieving goal congruence in complex environments: The case of welfare reform. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(2), 165–202.
51.
MolenveldA.VerhoestK.VoetsJ.SteenT. (2020). Images of coordination: How implementing organizations perceive coordination arrangements. Public Administration Review, 80(1), 9–22.
52.
MontjoyR. S.O’TooleL. J. (1979). Toward a theory of policy implementation: An organizational perspective. Public Administration Review, 39(5), 465–476.
53.
MoultonS.SandfortJ. R. (2017). The strategic action field framework for policy implementation research. Policy Studies Journal, 45(1), 144–169.
54.
NabatchiT.SancinoA.SiciliaM. (2017). Varieties of participation in public services: The who, when, and what of coproduction. Public Administration Review, 77(5), 766–776.
55.
NisarM. A. (2018). Children of a lesser god: Administrative burden and social equity in citizen–state interactions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(1), 104–119.
OstromE. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
58.
O’TooleL. J.Jr.MontjoyR. S. (1984). Interorganizational policy implementation: A theoretical perspective. Public Administration Review, 44(6), 491–503.
59.
PackardT.PattiR.DalyD.Tucker-TatlowJ. (2013). Implementing services integration and interagency collaboration: Experiences in seven counties. Administration in Social Work, 37(4), 356–371.
60.
PressmanJ. L.WildavskyA. (1984). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland; Or, why it’s amazing that federal programs work at all, this being a saga of the Economic Development Administration as told by two sympathetic observers who seek to build morals on a foundation. University of California Press.
61.
ProvanK. G.MilwardH. B. (2001). Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review, 61(4), 414–423.
62.
ProvanK. G.MilwardH. B.IsettK. R. (2002). Collaboration and integration of community-based health and human services in a nonprofit managed care system. Health Care Management Review, 27(1), 21–32.
RaineyH. G. (2014). Understanding and managing public organizations (5th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
65.
RiccucciN. M.MeyersM. K.LurieI.HanJ. S. (2004). The implementation of welfare reform policy: The role of public managers in front-line practices. Public Administration Review, 64(4), 438–448.
66.
RobichauR. W.LynnL. E. J. (2009). The implementation of public policy: Still the missing link. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 21–36.
67.
RomzekB. S.JohnstonJ. M. (2002). Effective contract implementation and management: A preliminary model. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(3), 423–453.
68.
RomzekB. S.LeRouxK.JohnstonJ.KempfR. J.PiatakJ. S. (2014). Informal accountability in multisector service delivery collaborations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(4), 813–842.
69.
SabatierP. A. (1986). Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: A critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy, 6(1), 21–48.
70.
SabatierP. A.MazmanianD. A. (1979). The conditions of effective implementation: A guide to accomplishing policy objectives. Policy Analysis, 5, 481–504.
71.
SaetrenH. (2014). Implementing the third generation research paradigm in policy implementation research: An empirical assessment. Public Policy and Administration, 29(2), 84–105.
72.
SaldañaJ. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE.
73.
SandfortJ. (1999). The structural impediments to human service collaboration: Examining welfare reform at the front lines. Social Service Review, 73(3), 314–339.
74.
SandfortJ. R.MoultonS. (2015). Effective implementation in practice: Integrating public policy and management. John Wiley.
75.
SandfortJ. R.MoultonS. (2020). Replication or innovation? Structuration in policy implementation. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 3(2), 141–154.
76.
SiciliaM.GuariniE.SancinoA.AndreaniM.RuffiniR. (2016). Public services management and co-production in multi-level governance settings. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(1), 8–27.
77.
SmithB. D.Mogro-WilsonC. (2007). Multi-level influences on the practice of inter-agency collaboration in child welfare and substance abuse treatment. Children and Youth Services Review, 29(5), 545–556.
78.
SmithB. D.Mogro-WilsonC. (2008). Inter-agency collaboration: Policy and practice in child welfare and substance abuse treatment. Administration in Social Work, 32(2), 5–24.
79.
SowaJ. E. (2008). Implementing interagency collaborations: Exploring variation in collaborative ventures in human service organizations. Administration & Society, 40(3), 298–323.
80.
van EngenN.SteijnB.TummersL. (2019). Do consistent government policies lead to greater meaningfulness and legitimacy on the front line?Public Administration, 97(1), 97–115.
81.
Van MeterD. S.Van HornC. E. (1975). The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework. Administration & Society, 6(4), 445–488.
82.
WillgingC. E.GundersonL.GreenA. E.JaramilloE. T.GarrisonL.EhrhartM. G.AaronsG. A. (2018). Perspectives from community-based organizational managers on implementing and sustaining evidence-based interventions in child welfare. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 42(4), 359–379.
83.
YinR. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE.
