The United States has long relied on private organizations to provide public services to poor communities. However, while the federal government’s support of the civic sector through grants and contracts is well studied, little research investigates how it subsidizes voluntary organizations through national service programs, such as Volunteers in Service to America (VISTA). In this article, we assess whether nonprofits that receive VISTA members show higher levels of donations and volunteers than matched nonprofits that did not receive VISTA members in the years following the Great Recession. We find that nonprofits that participated in the VISTA program had higher numbers of volunteers 2 years after participation, suggesting that national service was effective at supporting local organizations and building local civic infrastructure during an economic recovery. We also follow VISTA receiving organizations from 2010 to 2016 in a longitudinal design, finding a robust relationship of VISTA service and volunteering. These findings suggest VISTA is a resource for organizations and invite further research on the relationship between national service and anti-poverty work.
AllardS. W.SmallM. L. (2013). Reconsidering the urban disadvantaged: The role of systems, institutions, and organizations. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 647(1), 6–20.
2.
AndreoniJ.PayneA. A. (2003). Do government grants to private charities crowd out giving or fund-raising?American Economic Review, 93(3), 792–812.
3.
AshleyS. R.Van SlykeD. M. (2012). The influence of administrative cost ratios on state government grant allocations to nonprofits. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 47–56.
4.
BeckN.KatzJ. N. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 634–647.
BenensonJ.StaggA. (2016). An asset-based approach to volunteering: Exploring benefits for low-income volunteers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(Suppl. 1), 131S–149S.
7.
BerroneP.LilianaG.Massa-SaluzzoF.RousseauH. E. (2016). Understanding community dynamics in the study of grand challenges: How nonprofits, institutional actors, and the community fabric interact to influence income inequality. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 1940–1964.
8.
BetzlerD.GmürM. (2016). Does fundraising professionalization pay?Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 27(1), 27–42.
BrooksA. C. (2005). What do nonprofit organizations seek? (And why should policymakers care?). Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: The Journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, 24(3), 543–558.
11.
CaliendoM.KopeinigS. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), 31–72.
12.
CarrollD. A.StaterK. J. (2009). Revenue diversification in nonprofit organizations: Does it lead to financial stability?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(4), 947–966.
13.
ChoiN.DiNittoD. (2012). Predictors of time volunteering, religious giving, and secular giving: Implications for nonprofit organizations. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 39(2), 93–120.
14.
ClemensE. S.GuthrieD. (2010). Politics and partnerships: The role of voluntary associations in America’s political past and present. University of Chicago Press.
CoulstonA. M.CraigL.VossA. C. (1996). Meals-on-wheels applicants are a population at risk for poor nutritional status. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 96(6), 570–573.
19.
DayJ. (2000). Factfile: New generation of support. Marketing Week, 23(4), 44.
20.
de GraauwE.GleesonS.BloemraadI. (2013). Funding immigrant organizations: Suburban free riding and local civic presence. American Journal of Sociology, 119(1), 75–130.
21.
de WitA.BekkersR. (2017). Government support and charitable donations: A meta-analysis of the crowding-out hypothesis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(2), 301–319.
EsparzaN.JeonS. H. (2013). Interlocking boards of trustees and grant acquisition among homeless service organizations. Public Performance & Management Review, 36(4), 637–664.
24.
FrasureL. A.Jones-CorreaM. (2010). The logic of institutional interdependency: The case of day laborer policy in suburbia. Urban Affairs Review, 45(4), 451–482.
25.
FrumkinP. (2001). Balancing public accountability and nonprofit autonomy: Milestone contracting in Oklahoma (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 269361). Social Science Research Network.
26.
FrumkinP.JastrzabJ. (2010). Serving country and community: Who benefits from national service?Harvard University Press.
27.
GanglM. (2010). Causal inference in sociological research. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 21–47.
28.
GarrowE. E. (2014). Does race matter in government funding of nonprofit human service organizations? The interaction of neighborhood poverty and race. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(2), 381–405.
29.
GerberA. S.GreenD. P. (2012). Field experiments: Design, analysis, and interpretation. W. W. Norton & Company.
30.
GersteinL. H.WilkesonD. A.AndersonH. (2004). Differences in motivations of paid versus nonpaid volunteers. Psychological Reports, 94(1), 163–175.
31.
Giving USA. (2018). Giving USA 2018: The annual report on philanthropy for the year 2017.
32.
GrantL. E.PotoskiM. (2015). Collective reputations affect donations to nonprofits. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 34(4), 835–852.
GutierrezC. M. (2018). The institutional determinants of health insurance: Moving away from labor market, marriage, and family attachments under the ACA. American Sociological Review, 83(6), 1144–1170.
35.
HavensJ. J.O’HerlihyM. A.SchervishP. G. (2006). Charitable giving: How much, by whom, to what, and how. The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, 2, 542–567.
36.
HavilandA.NaginD. S.RosenbaumP. R.TremblayR. E. (2008). Combining group-based trajectory modeling and propensity score matching for causal inferences in nonexperimental longitudinal data. Developmental Psychology, 44(2), 422–436.
37.
HeutelG. (2014). Crowding out and crowding in of private donations and government grants. Public Finance Review, 42(2), 143–175.
38.
HodgkinsonV. A.WeitzmanM. S. (1986). Dimensions of the independent sector: A statistical profile (2nd ed.). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED301131
39.
IacusS. M.KingG.PorroG. (2012). Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1–24.
JilkeS.LuJ.XuC.ShinoharaS. (2019). Using large-scale social media experiments in public administration: Assessing charitable consequences of government funding of nonprofits. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(4), 627–639.
43.
Joassart-MarcelliP.WolchJ. R. (2003). The intrametropolitan geography of poverty and the nonprofit sector in Southern California. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(1), 70–96.
44.
KatzM. B. (1996). In the shadow of the poorhouse: A social history of welfare in America. Basic Books.
45.
KawachiI.KennedyB.GlassR. (1999). Social capital and self-rated health: A contextual analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 89(8), 1187–1193.
46.
LangR. E.HornburgS. P. (1998). What is social capital and why is it important to public policy?Housing Policy Debate, 9(1), 1–16.
47.
LecyJ. D.Van SlykeD. M. (2013). Nonprofit sector growth and density: Testing theories of government support. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 189–214.
48.
LevineJ. R. (2016). The privatization of political representation: Community-based organizations as nonelected neighborhood representatives. American Sociological Review, 81(6), 1251–1275.
49.
MarquisC.DavisG. F.GlynnM. A. (2013). Golfing alone? Corporations, elites, and nonprofit growth in 100 American communities. Organization Science, 24(1), 39–57.
50.
MartinD. G. (2004). Nonprofit foundations and grassroots organizing: Reshaping urban governance. The Professional Geographer, 56(3), 394–405.
51.
MarwellN. P. (2004). Privatizing the welfare state: Nonprofit community-based organizations as political actors. American Sociological Review, 69(2), 265–291.
52.
McCarthyJ. D.CastelliJ. (2002). The necessity for studying organizational advocacy comparatively. In FlynnP.HodgkinsonV. A. (Eds.), Nonprofit and civil society studies: Measuring the impact of the nonprofit sector (pp. 103–121). Springer.
53.
MeerJ.MillerD.WulfsbergE. (2017). The Great Recession and charitable giving. Applied Economics Letters, 24(21), 1542–1549.
54.
MewsM.BoenigkS. (2013). Does organizational reputation influence the willingness to donate blood?International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 10(1), 49–64.
NesbitR.ChristensenR. K.BrudneyJ. L. (2018). The limits and possibilities of volunteering: A framework for explaining the scope of volunteer involvement in public and nonprofit organizations. Public Administration Review, 78(4), 502–513.
57.
PaxtonP.ResslerR. W. (2018). Trust and participation in associations. In UslanerE. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social and political trust (pp.149–172). Oxford University Press.
58.
PaxtonP.VelascoK.ResslerR. (2020). Does the use of emotion increase donations and volunteers for nonprofits?American Sociological Review, 85(6), 1051–1083.
59.
PeckL. R. (2008). Do antipoverty nonprofits locate where people need them? Evidence from a spatial analysis of phoenix. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37(1), 138–151.
60.
PettijohnS. L.BorisE. T.De VitaC. J.FyffeS. (2013). Nonprofit-government contracts and grants: Findings from the 2013 National Survey. Urban Institute.
61.
PolsonE. C. (2017). Religious environments and the distribution of anti-poverty nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 46(1), 156–174.
62.
PowellW. W.SteinbergR. (2006). The nonprofit sector: A research handbook. Yale University Press.
63.
ReichR. (2010). Toward a political theory of philanthropy. In IllingworthP.PoggeT.WenarL. (Eds.), Giving well: The ethics of philanthropy (pp. 177–195). Oxford University Press.
SalamonL. M. (1987). Of market failure, voluntary failure, and third-party government: Toward a theory of government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 16(1–2), 29–49.
66.
SalamonL. M. (1989). Beyond privatization: The tools of government action. The Urban Institute.
67.
SalamonL. M. (1996). Partners in public service government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. The John Hopkins University Press.
68.
SampsonR. J. (2012). Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. University of Chicago Press.
69.
ShaeferH. L.EdinK. (2013). Rising extreme poverty in the United States and the response of federal means-tested transfer programs. Social Service Review, 87(2), 250–268.
70.
SharkeyP.Torrats-EspinosaG.TakyarD. (2017). Community and the crime decline: The causal effect of local nonprofits on violent crime. American Sociological Review, 82(6), 1214–1240.
71.
SmallM. L.JacobsE. M.MassengillR. P. (2008). Why organizational ties matter for neighborhood effects: Resource access through childcare centers. Social Forces, 87(1), 387–414.
72.
SmithS. R.LipskyM. (1994). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1993)
73.
SuárezD. F. (2011). Collaboration and professionalization: The contours of public sector funding for nonprofit organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), 307–326.
74.
TinkelmanD. (2010). Revenue interactions: Crowding out, crowding in, or neither? In SeamanB. A.YoungD. R. (Eds.), Handbook of research on nonprofit economics and management (pp. 18–41.). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Van SlykeD. M. (2007). Agents or stewards: Using theory to understand the government-nonprofit social service contracting relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(2), 157–187.
77.
VelascoK.PaxtonP.ResslerR. W.WeissI.PivnickL. (2019). Do national service programs improve subjective well-being in communities?The American Review of Public Administration, 49(3), 275–291.
78.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L.BradyH. E. (2002). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1995)
79.
VidovichL.CurrieJ. (2012). Governance networks: Interlocking directorships of corporate and nonprofit boards. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 22(4), 507–523.
80.
WeisbrodB. A. (1991). The nonprofit economy. Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1988)
81.
WingK. T.PollakT. H.BlackwoodA. (2008). The nonprofit almanac 2008. The Urban Institute.
82.
WolpertJ. (1993). Patterns of generosity in America: Who’s holding the safety net?Twentieth Century Fund Press.
83.
YanW.SloanM. F. (2016). The impact of employee compensation and financial performance on nonprofit organization donations. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(2), 243–258.
