Social Accountability Between Consensus and Confrontation: Developing a Theoretical Framework for Societal Accountability Relationships of Public Sector Organizations

Abstract

Numerous politicians and scholars have argued that accountability of public authorities to citizens, clients, and societal actors is needed in the current age of governance. Academic debates about social accountability are however scattered with incompatible conceptualizations, high normative expectations, and sobering findings. This article develops an in-depth framework that provides a comprehensive definition and typology of social accountability. It discusses major empirical challenges to social accountability and multiple behavioral styles within social accountability. By distinguishing consensual and confrontational styles of account-holding and account-giving, this article shows that social accountability could serve multiple purposes that go beyond rosy ideals.

Keywords

social accountability public accountability citizen participation administration and democracy public sector organizations

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aleksovska

Schillemans

Grimmelikhuijsen

(2019). Lessons from five decades of experimental and behavioral research on accountability: A systematic literature review. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 2(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.22.66

Ali

M. U.

Pirog

(2019). Social accountability and institutional change: The case of citizen oversight of police. Public Administration Review, 79(3), 411–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13055

Alon-Barkat

Gilad

(2016). Political control or legitimacy deficit? Bureaucracies’ symbolic responses to bottom-up public pressures. Policy & Politics, 44(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557315X14443003393944

Ankamah

S. S.

(2019). Why do “teeth” need “voice”? The case of anti-corruption agencies in three Australian states. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 78(4), 481–496. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12374

Arras

Braun

(2018). Stakeholders wanted! Why and how European Union agencies involve non-state stakeholders. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(9), 1257–1275. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1307438

Bekkers

Edwards

Moody

Beunders

(2011). Caught by surprise? Micro-mobilization, new media and the management of strategic surprises. Public Management Review, 13(7), 1003–1021. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2011.589615

Biela

Papadopoulos

(2014). The empirical assessment of agency accountability: A regime approach and an application to the German Bundesnetzagentur. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 80(2), 362–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852313514526

Boelen

Heck

J. E.

(1995). Defining and measuring the social accountability of medical schools (No. WHO/HRH/95.7). World Health Organization.

Boelen

Woollard

(2009). Social accountability and accreditation: A new frontier for educational institutions. Medical Education, 43(9), 887–894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03413.x

10.

Bovens

(2005). Public accountability. In Ferlie

Lynne

Pollitt

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management (pp. 182–208). Oxford University Press.

11.

Bovens

(2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x

12.

Bovens

(2010). Two concepts of accountability: Accountability as a virtue and as a mechanism. West European Politics, 33(5), 946–967. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2010.486119

13.

Bovens

Schillemans

Goodin

R. E.

(2014). Public accountability. In Bovens

Goodin

R. E.

Schillemans

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 1–20). Oxford University Press.

14.

Brandsen

van Hout

Oude Vrielink

Schillemans

(2008, May 15–16). Social accountability and the third sector. A critical appraisal. International workshop on social audit, social accounting and accountability, Prague.

15.

Busuioc

Lodge

(2017). Reputation and accountability relationships: Managing accountability expectations through reputation. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12612

16.

Byrkjeflot

Christensen

Lægreid

(2014). The many faces of accountability: Comparing reforms in welfare, hospitals and migration. Scandinavian Political Studies, 37(2), 171–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12019

17.

Christensen

Lodge

(2018). Reputation management in societal security: A comparative study. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(2), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016670030

18.

Curtin

Meijer

A. J.

(2006). Does transparency strengthen legitimacy? Information Polity, 11(2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2006-0091

19.

Damgaard

Lewis

J. M.

(2014). Accountability and citizen participation. In Bovens

Goodin

R. E.

Schillemans

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 258–272). Oxford University Press.

20.

Day

Klein

(1987). Accountabilities: Five public services. Tavistock.

21.

Deacon

Monk

(2002). News management and new managerialism. Journal of Political Marketing, 1(2–3), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1300/J199v01n02_03

22.

Djerf-Pierre

Ekström

Håkansson

Johansson

(2014). The mediatization of political accountability: Politics, the news media logic and industrial crises in the 1980s and 2000s. Journalism Studies, 15(3), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2014.889473

23.

Djerf-Pierre

Pierre

(2016). Mediatised local government: Social media activity and media strategies among local government officials 1989–2010. Policy & Politics, 44(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557315X14434624683411

24.

Flinders

(2001). The politics of accountability in the modern state. Routledge.

25.

Flinders

(2011). Daring to be a Daniel: The pathology of politicized accountability in a monitory democracy. Administration & Society, 43(5), 595–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399711403899

26.

Flinders

Moon

D. S.

(2011). The problem of letting go: The “Big Society,” accountable governance and “the curse of the decentralizing minister.” Local Economy, 26(8), 652–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094211422187

27.

Fox

J. A.

(2015). Social accountability: What does the evidence really say? World Development, 72, 346–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.03.011

28.

Gailmard

(2014). Principal agent theory and accountability. In Bovens

Goodin

R. E.

Schillemans

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 90–105). Oxford University Press.

29.

Gebreiter

Hidayah

N. N.

(2019). Individual responses to competing accountability pressures in hybrid organisations. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32, 727–749. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2017-3098

30.

Greiling

Grüb

(2015). Towards citizen accountability of local public enterprises. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 86(4), 641–655. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12098

31.

Greiling

Halachmi

(2014). Accountability and organizational learning in the public sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 36(3), 380–406. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576360301

32.

Greiling

Spraul

(2010). Accountability and the challenges of information disclosure. Public Administration Quarterly, 34(3), 338–377. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41288352

33.

Halachmi

Holzer

(2010). Citizen participation and performance management: Operationalizing democracy through better accountability. Public Administration Quarterly, 34(3), 378–399. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41288353

34.

Hall

A. T.

Ferris

G. R.

(2011). Accountability and extra-role behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 23(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-010-9148-9

35.

Hall

A. T.

Frink

D. D.

Buckley

M. R.

(2017). An accountability account: A review and synthesis of the theoretical and empirical research on felt accountability. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(2), 204–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2052

36.

Hupe

Hill

(2007). Street-level bureaucracy and public accountability. Public Administration, 85(2), 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00650.x

37.

Jacobs

Schillemans

(2016). Media and public accountability: Typology and exploration. Policy & Politics, 44(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/info:doi/10.1332/030557315X14431855320366

38.

Klenk

(2015). Accountability in practice: Organizational responses to public accountability claims. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(13–14), 983–996. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1069841

39.

Kohler-Koch

(2010). How to put matters right? Assessing the role of civil society in EU accountability. West European Politics, 33(5), 1117–1141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2010.486141

40.

Koop

(2014). Theorizing and explaining voluntary accountability. Public Administration, 92(3), 565–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12058

41.

Koppell

J. G

. (2005). Pathologies of accountability: ICANN and the challenge of “multiple accountabilities disorder.” Public Administration Review, 65(1), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00434.x

42.

Koppenjan

J. F. M.

(2007). Consensus and conflict in policy networks: Too much or too little? In Sørensen

Torfing

(Eds.), Theories of democratic network governance (pp. 133–152). Palgrave Macmillan.

43.

Lægreid

(2014). Accountability and new public management. In Bovens

Goodin

R. E.

Schillemans

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 324–338). Oxford University Press.

44.

Lerner

J. S.

Tetlock

P. E.

(1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.255

45.

Lindén

T. S.

(2015). Social accountability in immigration regulation: The inclusion of social actors in the asylum appeals process. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(13–14), 1009–1019. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1069843

46.

Lindquist

E. A.

Huse

(2017). Accountability and monitoring government in the digital era: Promise, realism and research for digital-era governance. Canadian Public Administration, 60(4), 627–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12243

47.

Maggetti

(2012). The media accountability of independent regulatory agencies. European Political Science Review, 4(3), 385–408. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773911000208

48.

Malena

Forster

Singh

(2004). Social accountability: An introduction to the concept and emerging practice (No. 76; Social Development Paper). World Bank.

49.

Mansbridge

(2014). A contingency theory of accountability. In Bovens

Goodin

R. E.

Schillemans

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 55–68). Oxford University Press.

50.

Mattei

Christensen

Pilaar

(2015). Conflicting accountabilities in the 2012 health care reforms in England. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(7), 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.949741

51.

Mattei

Mitra

Feiler

(2018). The politics of “social accountability” in England and Germany: Democratic control and moral imperatives. Public Organization Review, 18(3), 399–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-016-0343-5

52.

McCandless

H. E.

(2001). A citizen’s guide to public accountability: Changing the relationship between citizens and authorities. Trafford.

53.

Meijer

(2007). Publishing public performance results on the Internet: Do stakeholders use the Internet to hold Dutch public service organizations to account? Government Information Quarterly, 24(1), 165–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2006.01.014

54.

Meijer

(2014). Transparency. In Bovens

Goodin

R. E.

Schillemans

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 507–524). Oxford University Press.

55.

Meijer

Schillemans

(2009). Fictional citizens and real effects: Accountability to citizens in competitive and monopolistic markets. Public Administration and Management, 14(2), 254–291.

56.

Michels

Meijer

(2008). Safeguarding public accountability in horizontal government. Public Management Review, 10(2), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030801928490

57.

Mizrahi

Minchuk

(2019). Accountability and performance management: Citizens’ willingness to monitor public officials. Public Management Review, 21(3), 334–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1473478

58.

Moore

M. H.

(2014). Accountability, legitimacy, and the court of public opinion. In Bovens

Goodin

R. E.

Schillemans

(Eds.), Oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 632–648). Oxford University Press.

59.

Mudde

Kaltwasser

C. R.

(Eds.). (2012). Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or corrective for democracy? Cambridge University Press.

60.

Mulgan

(2003). Holding power to account: Accountability in modern democracies. Palgrave Macmillan.

61.

Mulgan

(2014). Accountability deficits. In Bovens

Goodin

R. E.

Schillemans

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 545–559). Oxford University Press.

62.

Neby

Lægreid

Mattei

Feiler

(2015). Bending the rules to play the game: Accountability, DRG and waiting list scandals in Norway and Germany. European Policy Analysis, 1(1), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.18278/epa.1.1.9

63.

Neu

Saxton

Everett

Shiraz

A. R.

(2020). Speaking truth to power: Twitter reactions to the Panama Papers. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(2), 473–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3997-9

64.

Norris

(2014). Watchdog journalism. In Bovens

Goodin

R. E.

Schillemans

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 525–544). Oxford University Press.

65.

Ojala

Pantti

Laaksonen

S.-M.

(2019). Networked publics as agents of accountability: Online interactions between citizens, the media and immigration officials during the European refugee crisis. New Media & Society, 21(2), 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818794592

66.

Overman

Schillemans

Grimmelikhuijsen

(2020). A validated measurement for felt relational accountability in the public sector: Gauging the account holder’s legitimacy and expertise. Public Management Review, 2020, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1751254

67.

Page

(2006). The web of managerial accountability: The impact of reinventing government. Administration & Society, 38(2), 166–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399705285990

68.

Peruzzotti

Smulovitz

(Eds.). (2006). Enforcing the rule of law: Social accountability in the new Latin American democracies. University of Pittsburgh Press.

69.

Pierre

(2009). Reinventing governance, reinventing democracy? Policy & Politics, 37(4), 591–609. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557309X477208

70.

Pollitt

Hupe

(2011). Talking about government: The role of magic concepts. Public Management Review, 13(5), 641–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2010.532963

71.

Reddick

C. G.

Demir

Perlman

(2020). Horizontal, vertical, and hybrid: An empirical look at the forms of accountability. Administration & Society, 52, 1410–1438. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399720912553

72.

Reichersdorfer

Christensen

Vrangbæk

(2013). Accountability of immigration administration: Comparing crises in Norway, Denmark and Germany. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(2), 271–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852313478251

73.

Romzek

B. S.

Dubnick

M. J.

(1987). Accountability in the public sector: Lessons from the challenger tragedy. Public Administration Review, 47(3), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.2307/975901

74.

Rubenstein

(2007). Accountability in an unequal world. The Journal of Politics, 69(3), 616–632. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00563.x

75.

Schillemans

(2007). Verantwoording in de schaduw van de macht. Horizontale verantwoording bij zelfstandige uitvoeringsorganisaties [Accountability in the shadow of hierarchy: Horizontal accountability of independent administrative bodies]. Lemma.

76.

Schillemans

(2008). Accountability in the shadow of hierarchy: The horizontal accountability of agencies. Public Organization Review, 8(2), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-008-0053-8

77.

Schillemans

(2011). Does horizontal accountability work? Evaluating potential remedies for the accountability deficit of agencies. Administration & Society, 43(4), 387–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399711412931

78.

Schillemans

Busuioc

(2015). Predicting public sector accountability: From agency drift to forum drift. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu024

79.

Schillemans

Van Twist

Vanhommerig

(2013). Innovations in accountability. Public Performance & Management Review, 36(3), 407–435. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576360302

80.

Sinclair

(1995). The chameleon of accountability: Forms and discourses. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0003-Y

81.

Strøm

(2000). Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 37(3), 261–290. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007064803327

82.

Thatcher

Sweet

A. S.

(2002). Theory and practice of delegation to non-majoritarian institutions. West European Politics, 25(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/713601583

83.

Van Eijk

Steen

. (2014). Why people co-produce: Analysing citizens’ perceptions on co-planning engagement in health care services. Public Management Review, 16(3), 358–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.841458

84.

Vanhommerig

Karré

P. M.

(2014). Public accountability in the Internet age: Changing roles for governments and citizens. International Review of Public Administration, 19(2), 206–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2014.928477

85.

Van Thiel

Leeuw

F. L

. (2002). The performance paradox in the public sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 25(3), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2002.11643661

86.

Verschuere

Verhoest

Meyers

Peters

B. G.

(2006). Accountability and accountability arrangements in public agencies. In Christensen

Lægreid

(Eds.), Autonomy and regulation: Coping with agencies in the modern state (pp. 268–300). Edward Elgar Publishing.

87.

Willems

Van Dooren

(2012). Coming to terms with accountability: Combining multiple forums and functions. Public Management Review, 14(7), 1011–1036. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.662446

88.

Wood

(2016). Politicisation, depoliticisation and anti-politics: Towards a multilevel research agenda. Political Studies Review, 14(4), 521–533. https://doi.org/10.1111/1478-9302.12074