The article examines administrative workarounds in the context of university research administration. The empirical results from 116 semi-structured interviews with academic researchers with active National Science Foundation awards are framed by a “Rules Response” model positing relationships among rules compliance requests, administrative burden, red tape, and response choices, including compliance, appeal, rule bending, rule breaking, and workaround behaviors. Propositions are presented and reviewed in light of empirical results. The article concludes with implications of empirical results for improving the Rules Response model and a more general discussion of research needed to improve the understanding of both rules compliance and workarounds.
AryeeS.ChenZ. X.BudhwarP. S. (2004). Exchange fairness and employee performance: An examination of the relationship between organizational politics and procedural justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 94(1), 1–14.
5.
AshtonD. (1970). Elton Mayo and the empirical study of social groups. In TilletA.KempneerT.WillG. (Eds.), Management thinkers (pp. 294–311). Penguin Books.
6.
AzadB.KingN. (2008). Enacting computer workaround practices within a medication dispensing system. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(3), 264–278.
7.
BallD. (2002). Quality measurement as a basis for resource allocation: Research assessment exercises in United Kingdom universities. R&D Management, 27(3), 281–289.
8.
BangaG. (2000, June18–23). Auto-diagnosis of field problems in an appliance operating system [Conference session]. USENIX Technical Conference, San Diego, CA, United States.
9.
BorryE. L. (2017). Ethical climate and rule bending: How organizational norms contribute to unintended rule consequences. Public Administration, 95(1), 78–96.
10.
BorryE. L.HendersonA. C. (2020). Patients, protocols, and prosocial behavior: Rule breaking in Frontline Health Care. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(1), 45–61.
11.
BoudreauM. C.RobeyD. (2005). Enacting integrated information technology: A human agency perspective. Organization Science, 16(1), 3–18.
12.
BozemanB. (2000). Bureaucracy and red tape. Prentice Hall.
13.
BozemanB.FeeneyM. K. (2011). Rules and red tape: A prism for public administration theory and research. M. E. Sharpe.
14.
BozemanB.GaughanM. (2011). Job satisfaction among university faculty: Individual, work, and institutional determinants. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(2), 154–186.
15.
BozemanB.JungJ. (2017). Bureaucratization in academic research policy: What causes it?Annals of Science and Technology Policy, 1(2), 133–214.
16.
BozemanB.YoutieJ. (2017). The strength in numbers: The new science of team science. Princeton University Press.
17.
BozemanB.YoutieJ. (2020). Robotic bureaucracy: Administrative burden and red tape in university research. Public Administration Review, 80(1), 157–162.
18.
BurdenB. C.CanonD. T.MayerK. R.MoynihanD. P. (2012). The effect of administrative burden on bureaucratic perception of policies: Evidence from election administration. Public Administration Review, 72(5), 741–751.
19.
CampbellD. (2012). Public managers in integrated services collaboratives: What works is workarounds. Public Administration Review, 72(5), 721–730.
20.
CantwellB. (2012). Postdocs and the internationalization of academic labor. International Higher Education, 69, 17–19.
21.
CasatiA.GenetC. (2014). Principal investigators as scientific entrepreneurs. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(1), 11–32.
22.
CookD. A.LeishmanT. R. (2004). Lessons learned from software engineering consulting. Journal of Defense Software Engineering, 17(4), 25–30.
23.
CunninghamJ.O’KaneC.O’ReillyP.MangematinV. (2015). Managerial challenges of publicly funded principal investigators. International Journal of Technology Management (IJTM), 68(3–4), 176–201.
24.
CunninghamJ.O’ReillyP.O’KaneC.MangematinV. (2014). The inhibiting factors that principal investigators experience in leading publicly funded research. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(1), 93–110.
25.
DahlkeS.HallW. A.BaumbuschJ. (2017). Constructing definitions of safety risks while nurses care for hospitalised older people: Secondary analysis of qualitative data. International Journal of Older People Nursing, 12(3), Article e12148.
26.
DavisonR. M.OuC. X. J. (2013, January). Sharing knowledge in technology deficient environments: Individual workarounds amid corporate restrictions [Conference session]. European Conference on Information Systems, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
27.
DebonoD. S.GreenfieldD.TravagliaJ. F.LongJ. C.BlackD.JohnsonJ.BraithwaiteJ. (2013). Nurses’ workarounds in acute healthcare settings: A scoping review. BMC Health Services Research, 13(1), 175–191.
28.
DeckerR. S.WimsattL.TriceA. G.KonstanJ. A. (2007). Faculty Burden Survey Project: A profile of federal-grant administrative burden among federal demonstration partnership faculty. National Academies Press.
29.
DoughtyM.BaehlerK. J. (2020). “Hostages to compliance”: Towards a reasonableness test for administrative burdens. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvaa010
30.
FerneleyE.SobreperezP. (2006). Resist, comply or workaround? An examination of different facets of user engagement with information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(4), 345–356.
31.
FineM. A.KurdekL. A. (1993). Reflections on determining authorship credit and authorship order on faculty-student collaborations. American Psychologist, 48(11), 1141–1147.
32.
FlemingC. J. (2020). Prosocial rule breaking at the street level: The roles of leaders, peers, and bureaucracy. Public Management Review, 22(8), 1191–1216. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1619817
33.
FredericksonH. G. (1980). New public administration. University of Alabama Press.
34.
FreemanJ. (2016). The socioecology of territory size and a” work-around” hypothesis for the adoption of farming. PLOS ONE, 11(7), Article e0158743. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158743
35.
FriedmannG. (1949). Philosophy underlying the Hawthorne investigation. Social Forces, 28, 204–209.
36.
GajduschekG. (2003). Bureaucracy: Is it efficient? Is it not? Is that the question? Uncertainty reduction: An ignored element of bureaucratic rationality. Administration & Society, 34, 700–723.
37.
GasserL. (1986). The integration of computing and routine work. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 4(3), 205–225.
GollinM.JackE.ChaseT.SorianoJ.SmithR. (2006). Winning the game: Public funds for biotech companies. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 12(3), 220–228.
GulatiR.PuranamP. (2009). Renewal through reorganization: The value of inconsistencies between formal and informal organization. Organization Science, 20(2), 422–440.
HalbeslebenJ. R.RathertC.BennettS. F. (2013). Measuring nursing workarounds: Tests of the reliability and validity of a tool. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 43(1), 50–55.
44.
HalbeslebenJ. R.SavageG. T.WakefieldD. S.WakefieldB. J. (2010). Rework and workarounds in nurse medication administration process: Implications for work processes and patient safety. Health Care Management Review, 35(2), 124–133.
45.
HerdP.DeLeireT.HarveyH.MoynihanD. P. (2013). Shifting administrative burden to the state: The case of Medicaid take-up. Public Administration Review, 73(s1), S69–S81.
46.
HerdP.MoynihanD. (2018). Administrative burden: Policymaking by other means. Russell Sage Foundation.
47.
HupeP.HillM. (2007). Street-level bureaucracy and public accountability. Public Administration, 85(2), 279–299.
IgnatiadisI.NandhakumarJ. (2009). The effect of ERP system workarounds on organizational control: An interpretivist case study. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 21(2), Article 3.
50.
JungJ.BozemanB.GaughanM. (2020). Fear in bureaucracy: Comparing public and private sector workers’ expectations of punishment. Administration & Society, 52(2), 233–264.
51.
KälvemarkS.HöglundA. T.HanssonM. G.WesterholmP.ArnetzB. (2004). Living with conflicts-ethical dilemmas and moral distress in the health care system. Social Science & Medicine, 58(6), 1075–1084.
52.
KaufmannW.FeeneyM. K. (2014). Beyond the rules: The effect of outcome favourability on red tape perceptions. Public Administration, 92(1), 178–191.
53.
KoppelR.SmithS. W.BlytheJ.KothariV. H. (2015). Workarounds to computer access in healthcare organizations: You want my password or a dead patient?ITCH, 15(4), 215–220.
54.
KoppelR.WetterneckT.TellesJ. L.KarshB. T. (2008). Workarounds to barcode medication administration systems: Their occurrences, causes, and threats to patient safety. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 15(4), 408–423.
55.
KwongL. Y. L. (2019, February11–14). Conceptualising workaround practices in the hotel industry [Conference session]. CAUTHE 2019: Sustainability of Tourism, Hospitality & Events in a Disruptive Digital Age—Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference, Central Queensland University, Cairns, QLD, Australia.
56.
LalleyC. (2014). Workarounds and obstacles: Unexpected source of innovation. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 38(1), 69–77.
57.
LipskyM. (1971). Street-level bureaucracy and the analysis of urban reform. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 6(4), 391–409.
58.
MackenzieK. D.MartelA.PriceW. L. (1982). Human resource planning and organizational design. In MenschG.NiehausR. J. (Eds.), Work, organizations, and technological change (pp. 213–227). Springer.
MartinB. R. (2011). The research excellence framework and the ‘impact agenda’: Are we creating a Frankenstein monster?Research Evaluation, 20(3), 247–254.
61.
MartinB. R. (2016). What’s happening to our universities?Prometheus, 34(1), 7–24.
62.
MayoE. (1949). Hawthorne and the western electric company. In StillmanR. J. (Ed.), Public administration: Concepts and cases (pp. 149–158). Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
63.
McNultyY.BrewsterC. (2019). Working internationally: Expatriation, migration and other global work. Edward Elgar.
64.
MendelS. C. (2017). Workarounds in nonprofit management: Counter theory for best practices innovation. Journal of Ideology, 38(1), Article 2.
65.
MichaelsJ. D. (2010). Privatization’s pretensions. The University of Chicago Law Review, 77, 717–780.
66.
MoynihanD.HerdP.HarveyH. (2015). Administrative burden: Learning, psychological, and compliance costs in citizen-state interactions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 43–69.
67.
MuldoonJ. (2012). The Hawthorne legacy: A reassessment of the impact of the Hawthorne studies on management scholarship, 1930-1958. Journal of Management History, 18(1), 105–119.
68.
MulfingerL. M.DresslerK. A.JamesL. E.PageN.SerranoE.VazquezJ. (2016). Trends in large proposal development at major research institutions. Journal of Research Administration, 47(1), 40–57.
69.
National Science Board. (2014). Reducing investigators’ administrative workload for federally funded research (No. NSB; 14–18).
70.
O’NeilS. K. (2017). The Mexican standoff: Trump and the art of the workaround. Foreign Affairs, 96, Article 43.
71.
PandeyS. K.ScottP. G. (2002). Red tape: A review and assessment of concepts and measures. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(4), 553–580.
72.
PeetersR. (2020). The political economy of administrative burdens: A theoretical framework for analyzing the organizational origins of administrative burdens. Administration & Society, 52(4), 566–592. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399719854367
73.
PhilbinS. P. (2011). An investigation of the development and management of university research institutes. Journal of Research Administration, 42, 103–122.
74.
PrierE.McCueC. P. (2009). The implications of a muddled definition of public procurement. Journal of Public Procurement, 9(3–4), 326–370.
75.
RabieH. R.LuwesN. J.VermaakH. J. (2018). External thermal camera exposure control workaround for low-cost security thermal cameras. Journal for New Generation Sciences, 16(1), 101–112.
76.
RöderN.WiescheM.SchermannM. (2014). A situational perspective on workarounds in IT-enabled business processes: A multiple case study. Proceedings of European Conference of Information Systems (ECIS), 6(6), 1–15.
77.
RoethlisbergerF. J.DicksonW. J. (1934). Management and the worker: Technical vs. social organization in an industrial plant (No. 9). Harvard University.
78.
RourkeF. E. (1992). Responsiveness and neutral competence in American bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 52(6), 539–546.
79.
SafadiH.FarajS. (2010, December12–15). The role of workarounds during an open source electronic medical record system implementation [Paper presentation]. ICIS 2010 Proceedings, Paper 47, Saint Louis, MO, United States.
80.
SandersT.HardyK. (2014). Flexible workers: Labour, regulation and the political economy of the stripping industry. Routledge.
81.
SchickA. (1969). Systems politics and systems budgeting. Public Administration Review, 29(2), 137–151.
82.
SeamanJ. B.ErlenJ. A. (2015). Workarounds in the workplace—A second look. Orthopedic Nursing, 34(4), 235–242.
83.
SekerkaL. E.ZolinR. (2007). Rule-bending: Can prudential judgment affect rule compliance and values in the workplace?Public Integrity, 9(3), 225–243.
84.
SpencerT.ScottJ. (2017). Research administrative burden: A qualitative study of local variations and relational effects. Research Management Review, 22(1), 1–29.
85.
StorchJ. L. (2005). Patient safety: Is it just another bandwagon?Nursing Leadership, 18(2), 39–55.
86.
StrongD.MillerS. M. (1995). Exceptions and exception handling in computerized information processes. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 13(2), 206–233.
87.
TermanJ. N. (2017). What happens when rules stay the same? Examining changes in implementation intent over time. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(1), 36–53.
88.
ThaiK. V. (2001). Public procurement re-examined. Journal of Public Procurement, 1(1), 9–50.
89.
TuckerA. L.ZhengS.GardnerJ. W.BohnR. E. (2020). When do workarounds help or hurt patient outcomes? The moderating role of operational failures. Journal of Operations Management, 66(1–2), 67–90.
VogelsmeierA. A.HalbeslebenJ. R.Scott-CawiezellJ. R. (2008). Technology implementation and workarounds in the nursing home. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 15(1), 114–119.
92.
WaughW. L.Jr. (2003). Issues in university governance: More “professional” and less academic. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 585(1), 84–96.
93.
WeckowskaD. M.Molas-GallartJ.TangP.TwiggD.Castro-MartínezE.Kijeńska-DąbrowskaI.MeyerM. (2018). University patenting and technology commercialization–legal frameworks and the importance of local practice. R&D Management, 48(1), 88–108.
94.
WeidmanJ. C.SteinE. L. (2003). Socialization of doctoral students to academic norms. Research in Higher Education, 44(6), 641–656.
95.
WestW. F. (2005). Neutral competence and political responsiveness: An uneasy relationship. Policy Studies Journal, 33(2), 147–160.
96.
WestphalJ.LancasterR.ParkD. (2014). Workarounds observed by fourth-year nursing students. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 36(8), 1002–1018.
97.
WhitakerA.CoxR. S.GribbleS. D. (2004). Configuration debugging as search: Finding the needle in the haystack. Proceedings Operating Systems Design and Implementation, 4(1), 77–90.
98.
WildavskyA. B. (1961). Political implications of budgetary reform. Public Administration Review, 21(4), 183–190.
99.
WildavskyA. B. (1964). Politics of the budgetary process. Little, Brown and Company.
100.
YuanC.LaoN.WenJ. R.LiJ.ZhangZ.WangY. M.MaW. Y. (2006). Automated known problem diagnosis with event traces. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 40(4), 375–388.
