This article summarizes the findings of the contributions collected in the special issue “The Technology of Information, Communication, and Administration—An Entwined History” dedicated to the accelerated mechanization and the later digitization of administrative information processing in the 20th century. It develops a conceptual framework around the notions of administration, process, information, media, and power that allow for situating the contributions within the broad field of interaction spanned by the materiality of hybrid administrative processes and the ideological dynamics in society. It suggests promising lines of research for further studies in the history of administration and information.
BenigerJ. R. (1986). The control revolution: Technological and economic origins of the information society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
BlokA.JensenT. E. (2011). Bruno Latour: Hybrid thoughts in a hybrid world. New York, NY: Routledge.
6.
BucklandM. K. (1991). Information and information systems. New York, NY: Praeger.
7.
BushV. (1945, July). As we may think. The Atlantic Monthly, 176, 101-108.
8.
CapurroR. (2009). Past, present, and future of the concept of information. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 7, 125-141. Retrieved from http://www.capurro.de/infoconcept.pdf
9.
CapurroR.HjørlandB. (2003). The concept of information. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 343-411. doi:10.1002/aris.1440370109
10.
ChandlerA. D.Jr. (1977). The visible hand: The managerial revolution in American business. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
11.
ChandlerA. D.Jr.CortadaJ. W. (Eds.). (2000). A nation transformed by information: How information has shaped the United States from colonial times to the present. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
CleggS.LounsburyM. (2009). Weber: Sintering the iron cage—Translation, domination, and rationality. In AdlerP. S. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of sociology and organization studies: Classical foundations (pp. 118-145). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14.
CollinP.LutterbeckK.-G. (Eds.). (2009). Eine intelligente Maschine? Handlungsorientierung moderner Verwaltung [An intelligent machine? Action orientation of modern administration] (19./20. Jh.). Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.
15.
CookB. J. (2018). Bureaucracy and democracy: Perils and prospects. In StazykE. C.FredericksonH. G. (Eds.), Handbook of American public administration (pp. 81-98). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
16.
CortadaJ. W. (2008). The digital hand, Vol. 3: How computers changed the work of American public sector industries. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 2004)
17.
CortadaJ. W. (2009). How societies embrace information technology: Lessons for management and the rest of us. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
18.
CortadaJ. W. (2011). Information and the modern corporation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
CortadaJ. W. (2012). The digital flood: The diffusion of information technology across the U.S., Europe, and Asia. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
20.
da SilvaC.SaesM. S. M. (2007). Governance structure and transaction cost: Relationship between strategy and asset specificity. Nova Economia, 17, 443-468. doi:10.1590/S0103-63512007000300004
21.
DommannM. (2014). Autoren und Apparate: Die Geschichte des Copyrights im Medienwandel [Authors and apparatuses: The history of copyright in media change]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: S. Fischer.
22.
DouglasM. (1986). How institutions think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
23.
EisenstadtS. N. (2000). Multiple modernities [Special issue]. Daedalus, 129, 1-29.
24.
GraberD. A. (2003). The power of communication: Managing information in public organizations. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
25.
GugerliD. (2009). Suchmaschinen: Die Welt als Datenbank [Search engines: The world as a database]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
26.
GugerliD. (2012). The world as database: On the relation of software development, query methods, and interpretative independence. Information & Culture, 47, 288-311. doi:10.1353/lac.2012.0016
27.
GugerliD. (2018). Wie die Welt in den Computer kam: Zur Entstehung digitaler Wirklichkeit [How the world got into the computer: On the emergence of digital reality]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: S. Fischer.
28.
KaeslerD. (2012). Ein “stahlhartes Gehäuse” ist kein “Iron Cage”: Über Forscher, die kein Deutsch können [A “steel-hard casing” is not an “iron cage”: About researchers who do not know German]. literaturkritik.de, 14(1). Retrieved from http://literaturkritik.de/public/rezension.php?rez_id=16239
29.
KarpatschofB. (2000). Human activity: Contributions to the anthropological sciences from a perspective of activity theory. Copenhagen, Denmark: Dansk Psykologisk Forlag.
30.
KieserA. (2006). Max Webers Analyse der Bürokratie [Max Weber’s analysis of bureaucracy]. In KieserA.EbersM. (Eds.), Organisationstheorien [Organizational theories] (pp. 63-92). Stuttgart, Germany: Verlag W. Kohlhammer.
31.
LatourB. (1990). Drawing things together. In LynchM.WoolgarS. (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 19-68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32.
LatourB. (1991). Technology is society made durable. In LawJ. (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination (Sociological Review Monograph, 38, pp. 103-132). London, UK & New York, NY: Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/46-TECHNOLOGY-DURABLE-GBpdf.pdf
33.
LatourB. (1992). Visualisation and cognition: Drawing things together. In KuklickH. (Ed.), Knowledge and society: Studies in the sociology of culture past and present (pp. 1-40). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
34.
LatourB. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
35.
LatourB. (2010). The making of law: An ethnography of the Conseil d’État. Cambridge UK: Polity Press.
36.
LawJ. (1991). Power, discretion and strategy. In LawJ. (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination (Sociological Review Monograph, 38, pp. 165-191). London, UK & New York, NY: Routledge.
37.
LuhmannN. (1971). Reform und Information: Theoretische Überlegungen zur Reform der Verwaltung [Reform and information: Theoretical reflections on administrative reform]. In LuhmannN. (Ed.), Politische Planung: Aufsätze zur Soziologie von Politik und Verwaltung [Political Planning: Essays on Sociology of Politics and Administration] (pp. 181-202). Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
38.
LuhmannN. (1987). Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie [Social systems: outline of a general theory]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
39.
LuhmannN. (1997). Legitimation durch Verfahren [Legitimation through procedure]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp. (Original work published 1969)
40.
LuhmannN. (1998). Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft [The society of the society]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
41.
MachlupF. (1983). Semantic quirks in studies of information. In MachlupF.MansfieldU. (Eds.), The study of information: Interdisciplinary messages (pp. 641-671). New York, NY: John Wiley.
42.
MannM. (1995). The sources of social power: Volume 2: The rise of classes and nation states, 1760-1914. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43.
McKinleyW.MoneM. A. (2003). Micro and macro perspectives in organization theory: A tale of incommensurability. In TsoukasH.KnudsenC. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organization theory: Meta-theoretical perspectives (pp. 345-372). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
44.
McLuhanM. (1996). Understanding media: The extensions of man. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1964)
45.
MussellJ. (2013). Doing and making: History as digital practice. In WellerT. (Ed.), History in the digital age (pp. 79-94). London, England: Routledge.
46.
NellenS. (2011, September16). Departementalisierung: Die Geburt der Verwaltung aus dem ›Geist‹ der Praxis [ Departmentalization: The birth of administration from the ‘spirit’ of practice]. Öffentliche Verwaltung im Wandel: Verwaltungsreformen in der Schweiz im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert 1920, Symposium [Public administration in transition. Administrative reforms in Switzerland in the 19th and 20th centuries], Swiss Federal Archives, Bern, Switzerland. Retrieved from https://www.bar.admin.ch/dam/bar/de/dokumente/verwaltungsgeschichte/beitrag-nellen-16092011.pdf
47.
NellenS. (2016). Die Akte der Verwaltung: Zu den administrativen Grundlagen des Rechts [The acts of administration. The administrative foundations of law]. In TwellmannM. (Ed.), Wissen, wie Recht ist: Bruno Latours empirische Philosophie einer Existenzweise [Knowing what law is like. Bruno Latour’s empirical philosophy of a mode of existence] (pp. 65-91). Konstanz, Germany: Konstanz University Press.
48.
OeserE. (1976). Wissenschaft und Information: Systematische Grundlagen einer Theorie der Wissenschaftsentwicklung: Erkenntnis als Informationsprozess [Science and Information. Systematic foundations of a theory of scientific development Knowledge as an information process] (Vol. 2). Vienna, Austria: R. Oldenburg.
49.
OuchiW. G. (1980). Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 129-141.
50.
PughD. S.HicksonD. J. (2007). Great writers on organizations: The third omnibus edition. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
51.
RaadscheldersJ. C. N. (2009). Handbook of administrative history. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
52.
RaadscheldersJ. C. N.WagenaarP.RutgersM. R.OvereemP. (2000). Against a study of the history of public administration: A manifesto. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 22, 772-791. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25611477
53.
RappA.BenderM. (2013). Die Memex-Idee: Die Netzikone Vannevar Bush und die maschinelle Erweiterung des Denkens [The Memex idea. The web icon Vannevar Bush and the machine extension of thinking]. Zeitschrift für Ideengeschichte, VII(4), 53-64.
54.
SagerF.RosserC. (2009). Weber, Wilson, and Hegel: Theories of modern bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 69, 1136-1147.
55.
ScottJ. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
56.
ScottJ. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
57.
ShafritzJ. M.J.OttJangY. S. (Eds.). (2005). Classics of organization theory. Boston, MA: Thomson Wadsworth.
58.
ShannonC. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423.
59.
SimonH. A. (1995). Organizations and markets. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5, 273-294.
60.
SimonH. A. (1997). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization. New York, NY: Free Press. (Original work published 1947)
61.
SommarugaS. (2014, December11). Die Verfassung ist keine Zeichen-Sammlung [The Constitution is not a collection of signs]. Neue Zürcher Zeitung, p. 11.
62.
StehrN. (2003). Wissenspolitik: Die Überwachung des Wissens [Knowledge policy. The monitoring of knowledge]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.
63.
TijstermanS. P.OvereemP. (2008). Escaping the iron cage: Weber and Hegel on bureaucracy and freedom. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 30, 71-91.
64.
VismannC. (2000). Akten: Medientechnik und Recht [Files. Media Technology and Law]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: S. Fischer.
65.
WeberM. (1980). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundriß der verstehenden Soziologie [Economy and Society. Outline of Interpretative Sociology]. Tübingen, Germany: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck). (Original work published 1921-1922). Retrieved from http://www.zeno.org/nid/20011439831
66.
WeberM. (1986). Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus [The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism]. In Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie [Collected essays on the sociology of religion] (Vol. 1, pp. 17-206). Tübingen, Germany: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck). (Original work published 1920). Retrieved from http://www.zeno.org/nid/20011440546
67.
WellerT. (2008). Information history—An introduction: Exploring an emergent field. Oxford, UK: Chandos Publishing.
68.
WellerT. (2011). Introduction. In WellerT. (Ed.), Information history in the modern world: Histories of the information age (pp. 1-12). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
69.
WilliamsonO. E. (1991). Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 269-296.
70.
WilsonW. (1887). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2, 197-222.
71.
YatesJ. (1985). Structural effects of communication technologies on firms: Lessons from the past. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
72.
YatesJ. (1987). From hand copy to xerox copy: The effect of innovations in duplicating technology on organizational communication. In ThayerL. (Ed.), Organizational communication: Emerging perspectives II (pp. 82-103). New York, NY: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
73.
YatesJ. (1989). Control through communication: The rise of system in American management (pp. 82-103). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
74.
YatesJ. (2005). Structuring the information age: Life insurance and technology in the twentieth century. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
