What Do We Mean by Democracy? Reflections on an Essentially Contested Concept and Its Relationship to Politics and Public Administration

Abstract

This article argues that democracy is an essentially contested concept in that its meaning and applications appear to be subject to endless contestation, but that the origins of such contestation are to be found in our political practices rather than in the concept per se. It is also argued that the idea of contestation itself is an important part of our own historically situated understanding of democracy. The implications of these arguments for how public administration scholars should think about democracy and constitutionalism are examined.

Keywords

democracy philosophy constitutionalism political theory essentially contested concepts

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berlin

(1969). Four essays on liberty. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Berlin

(1979). Concepts and categories. New York, NY: Viking Press.

Bertelli

A. M.

Lynn

L. E.

Jr. (2006). Public management in the shadow of the constitution. Administration & Society, 38, 31-57.

Bovens

(2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13, 447-468.

Box

R. C.

Marshall

G. S.

Reed

B. J.

Reed

C. M.

(2001). New public management and substantive democracy. Public Administration Review, 61, 608-619.

Clarke

(1979). Eccentrically contested concepts. British Journal of Political Science, 9, 122-126.

Collier

Hidalgo

F. D.

Maciuceanu

A. O.

(2006). Essentially contested concepts: Debates and applications. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11, 211-246.

Connolly

W. E.

(1993). The terms of political discourse (3rd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Crick

(1993). In defence of politics (4th ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

10.

Crick

(2002). Democracy: A very short introduction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

11.

Denhardt

R. B.

Denhardt

J. V.

(2000). The new public service: Serving rather than rowing. Public Administration Review, 60, 549-559.

12.

Farmer

D. J.

(1995). The language of public administration. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

13.

Finer

(1941). Administrative responsibility in democratic government. Public Administration Review, 1, 335-350.

14.

Fox

C. J.

Miller

H. T.

(1995). Postmodern public administration: Toward discourse. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

15.

Gallie

W. B.

(1956). Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, 56, 167-198.

16.

Gallie

W. B.

(1968). Philosophy and the historical understanding (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Schocken Books.

17.

Garver

(1990). Essentially contested concepts: The ethics and tactics of argument. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 23, 251-270.

18.

Goodnow

F. J.

(1900). Politics and administration. New York, NY: Russell & Russell.

19.

Grafstein

(1988). A realist foundation for essentially contested political concepts. The Western Political Quarterly, 41, 9-28.

20.

Gray

J. N.

(1977). On the contestability of social and political concepts. Political Theory, 5, 331-348.

21.

Hampshire

(2000). Justice is conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

22.

Hatab

L. J.

(1995). A Nietzschean defense of democracy: An experiment in postmodern politics. Chicago, IL: Open Court.

23.

Heidelberg

(2017). The democracy problem. Administration & Society. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0095399717709858

24.

Hidalgo

(2008). Conceptual history and politics: Is the concept of democracy essentially contested? Contributions to the History of Concepts, 4, 176-201.

25.

Long

(1949). Power and administration. Public Administration Review, 9, 257-264.

26.

Machiavelli

(1950). The prince and the discourses. New York, NY: Random House.

27.

Morgan

D. F.

Green

Shinn

C. W.

Robinson

K. S.

(2013). Foundations of public service (2nd ed.). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

28.

Mosher

F. C.

(1968). Democracy and the public service. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

29.

Newbold

Rosenbloom

D. H.

(Eds.). (2017). The constitutional school of American public administration. New York, NY: Routledge.

30.

Pitkin

H. F.

(1993). Wittgenstein and justice. Berkeley: University of California Press.

31.

Ranney

Kendall

(1951). Democracy: Confusion and agreement. The Western Political Quarterly, 4, 430-439.

32.

Redford

E. S.

(1969). Democracy in the administrative state. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

33.

Roberts

(2017). Four crises of American democracy: Representation, mastery, discipline, anticipation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

34.

Rohr

J. A.

(1986). To run a constitution. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

35.

Rousseau

(1913). The social contact and discourses ( Cole

G. D. H.

, Trans.). New York, NY: E .P. Dutton.

36.

Trenchard

Gordon

(1995). Cato’s letters (Vol. 2). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Press.

37.

Ventriss

(1998). Radical democratic thought and contemporary American public administration. American Review of Public Administration, 28, 227-245.

38.

Waldo

(1952). Development of theory of democratic administration. American Political Science Review, 46, 81-103.

39.

Waldo

(1984). The administrative state. New York, NY: Holmes & Meier.

40.

Wamsley

Bacher

R. N.

Goodsell

C. T.

Kronenberg

P. S.

Rohr

J. A.

Stivers

C. M.

. . . Wolf

J. F.

(1990). Refounding public administration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

41.

Wills

(Ed.). (1982). The federalist papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. New York, NY: Bantam Books.

42.

Wilson

J. Q.

(1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York, NY: Basic Books.

43.

Wilson

(1887). The study of administration. American Political Science Review, 2, 197-222.

44.

Wittgenstein

(1958). Philosophical investigations (3rd ed.) ( Anscombe

G. E. M.

, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell and Mott.