We propose, from a focal organization’s perspective, a holistic framework for an interorganizational collaboration (IOC) that integrates the resource dependence theory and the triangular alignment perspective to account for the impact external factors such as international donors and internal factors such as the focal organization’s competencies have on the IOC’s antecedents, process, and outcomes. We base our arguments on the case of the National AIDS Control Organisation (NACO) that collaborated with various international and domestic partners to effectively reduce the incidence of HIV/AIDS in India.
Anonymous. (1999). India: HIV spreads despite World Bank project. AIDS Weekly Plus, 17, 10-11.
2.
AnsellC.GashA. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 543-571.
3.
BaoG.WangX.LarsenG. L.MorganD. F. (2013). Beyond new public governance: A value-based global framework for performance management, governance, and leadership. Administration & Society, 45, 443-467.
4.
BarzelY. (1982). Measurement cost and the organization of markets. Journal of Law and Economics, 25, 27-48.
5.
BeachS.KeastR.PickernellD. (2012). Unpacking the connections between network and stakeholder management and their application to road infrastructure networks in Queensland. Public Management Review, 14, 609-629.
6.
BerardoR.HeikkilaT.GerlakA. K. (2014). Interorganizational engagement in collaborative environmental management: Evidence from the South Florida ecosystem restoration task force. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24, 697-719.
7.
BigelowB.StoneM. M. (1995). Why don’t they do what we want—An exploration of organization responses to institutional pressures in community-health centres. Public Administration Review, 55, 183-192.
8.
BrysonJ. M.CrosbyB. C.StoneM. M. (2006). Design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66, 44-55.
9.
BrysonJ. M.CrosbyB. C.StoneM. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75, 647-663.
10.
BusuiocE. M. (2016). Friend or foe? Inter-agency cooperation, organizational reputation, and turf inter-agency cooperation. Public Administration, 94,40-56.
11.
ClarkeA.FullerM. (2010). Collaborative strategic management: Strategy formulation and implementation by multi-organizational cross-sector social partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 85-101.
12.
DeshpandeS. (2016). Corporate social marketing: Harmonious symphony or cacophonous noise?Social Marketing Quarterly, 22, 255-263.
13.
EmersonK.NabatchiT.BaloghS. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1-29.
14.
GomesR. C.LiddleJ.GomesL. O. M. (2010). A five-sided model of stakeholder influence. Public Management Review, 12, 701-724.
15.
GrayB. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multi-party problems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
16.
GrayB. (1991). Collaborative alliances: Moving from practice to theory. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(1), 3-22.
17.
GrönroosC. (1998). Marketing services: The case of a missing product. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 13, 322-338.
18.
HeadB. W. (2008). Assessing network-based collaborations. Public Management Review, 10, 733-749.
HillmanA. J.WithersM. C.CollinsB. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35, 1404-1427.
21.
HuxhamC. (2003). Theorizing collaboration practice. Public Management Review, 5, 401-423.
22.
JaquesT. (2009). Issue management as a post-crisis discipline: Identifying and responding to issue impacts beyond the crisis. Journal of Public Affairs, 9(1), 35.
KaluK. N. (2013). All that glitters: Competing narratives and transaction costs in complex collaborative environments. Administration & Society, 45, 420-442.
25.
KislovR. (2014). Boundary discontinuity in a constellation of interconnected practices. Public Administration, 92, 307-323.
26.
KoppenjanJ. (2008). Creating a playing field for assessing the effectiveness of network collaboration by performance measures. Public Management Review, 10, 699-714.
27.
KvaleS.BrinkmannS. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (Vol. 2nd). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
MalatestaD.SmithC. R. (2011). Resource dependence, alternative supply sources, and the design of formal contracts. Public Administration Review, 71(4), 608.
30.
MalatestaD.SmithC. R. (2014). Lessons from resource dependence theory for contemporary public and nonprofit management. Public Administration Review, 74, 14-25.
31.
Monitoring the AIDS Pandemic Network-MAP. (2004). AIDS in Asia: Face the facts (MAP Report). Washington, DC: Monitoring the AIDS Pandemic Network.
32.
MaxwellJ. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (Vol. 41). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
McLoughlinC. (2011). Factors affecting state-non-governmental organisation relations in service provision: Key themes from the literature. Public Administration & Development, 31, 240-251.
34.
MitraP. (2004). India at the crossroads: Battling the HIV/AIDS pandemic. The Washington Quarterly, 27, 95-107.
35.
National AIDS Control Organisation-NACO. (2006). National AIDS Control Programme Phase III: Strategy and Implementation Plan. National AIDS Control Organisation, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare of India, New Delhi.
36.
National AIDS Control Organisation-NACO. (2007). NACP III: To halt and reverse the HIV epidemic in India. National AIDS Control Organisation, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare of India, New Delhi.
37.
National AIDS Control Organisation-NACO. (2008). Operational guidelines for HIV sentinel surveillance. National AIDS Control Organisation, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare of India, New Delhi.
38.
National AIDS Control Organisation-NACO. (2012). HIV sentinel surveillance 2010-2011: A technical brief. National AIDS Control Organisation, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare of India, New Delhi.
39.
O’FlynnJ. (2007). From new public management to public value: Paradigmatic change and managerial implications. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66, 353-366.
40.
O’LearyR.VijN. (2012). Collaborative public management: Where have we been and where are we going?The American Review of Public Administration, 42, 507-522.
41.
OliverC. (1991). Strategic response to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 18, 145-179.
OsborneS. P. (2006). The new public governance?Public Management Review, 8, 377-387.
44.
OsborneS. P. (2009). Delivering public services: Time for a new theory?Public Management Review, 12(1), 1-10.
45.
OsborneS. P.RadnorZ.NasiG. (2013). A new theory for public service management? Toward a (public) service-dominant approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 43, 135-158.
46.
PfefferJ.SalancikG. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
47.
PieningE. P. (2013). Dynamic capabilities in public organizations: A literature review and research agenda. Public Management Review, 15, 209-245.
48.
ProvanK. G.KenisP. (2007). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 229-252.
49.
RethemeyerR. K.HatmakerD. M. (2008). Network management reconsidered: An inquiry into management of network structures in public sector service provision. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 18, 617-646.
50.
RodríguezC.LangleyA.DenisJ. -L.BélandF. (2007). Governance, power, and mandated collaboration in an interorganizational network. Administration & Society, 39, 150-193.
51.
RuckertA.LabontéR. (2014). Public–private partnerships (ppps) in global health: The good, the bad and the ugly. Third World Quarterly, 35, 1598-1614.
52.
SalancikG. R.PfefferJ. (1974). The bases and use of power in organizational decision making: The case of a university. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, 453-473.
53.
SchachterH. L. (2011). The New York School of Philanthropy, the Bureau of Municipal Research, and the trail of the missing women: A public administration history detective story. Administration & Society, 43(1), 3.
54.
SmallM. L. (2009). “How many cases do I need?” On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography, 10(1), 5-38.
55.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
56.
SullivanH.WilliamsP.JeffaresS. (2011). Leadership for collaboration. Public Management Review, 14(1), 41-66.
57.
TermeerC.DewulfA.BreemanG.StillerS. J. (2015). Governance capabilities for dealing wisely with wicked problems. Administration & Society, 47, 680-710.
58.
ThompsonJ. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
59.
ThomsonA. M.PerryJ. L. (2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review, 66, 20-32.
60.
VangenS.WinchesterN. (2013). Managing cultural diversity in collaborations: A focus on management tensions. Public Management Review, 16, 686-707.
61.
WilliamsonO. E. (1991). Strategizing, economizing, and economic organization. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 75-94.
62.
WoodD.GrayB. (1991). Toward a comprehensive theory of collaboration. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27, 139-162.
World Bank. (2007). Project appraisal document on a proposed credit in the amount of SDR 167.9 million (US$ 250 million equivalent) to the Republic of India for a Third National HIV/AIDS control project. Report No: 36413-IN. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/177231468267920611/pdf/36413.pdf
