Race and Gender Representation in Presidential Appointments,SES,and GS Levels,During Clinton,Bush,and Obama Administrations

Abstract

Achieving a representative bureaucracy that reflects the attitudes, values, and policy choices of women and racial minorities is imperative, as the gap in the representation of those groups in the federal workforce is growing. We examine to what extent female and minority representation in political appointments, Senior Executive Service (SES), and General Schedule (GS) 1-15 levels reflect presidents’ commitment to diversity. We use data from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management to compare the tenures of presidents William J. Clinton (1993 to 2000), George W. Bush (2001-2008), and Barack H. Obama (2009-2013), and examine the employment trends from 1993 to 2013.

Keywords

diversity women and minorities representative bureaucracy political appointees SES positions GS 1-15 party affiliation federal workforce

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Borrelli

(2010). The contemporary presidency: Gender desegregation and gender integration in the President’s cabinet, 1933-2010. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 40, 734-749. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5705.2010.03809.x

Bowling

C. J.

Kelleher

C. A.

Jones

Wright

D. S.

(2006). Cracked ceilings, firmer floors, and weakening walls: Trends and patterns in gender representation among executives leading American state agencies, 1970-2000. Public Administration Review, 66, 823-836. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00651.x

Brewer

G. A.

Maranto

R. A.

(2000). Comparing the roles of political appointees and career executives in the US federal executive branch. The American Review of Public Administration, 30(1), 69-86. doi:10.1177/02750740022064551

Brudney

J. L.

Hebert

T. F.

Wright

D. S.

(2000). From organizational values to organizational roles: Examining representative bureaucracy in state administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 491-512. Available from http://connection.ebscohost.com/

Candidate Obama’s sense of urgency. (2007, February 11). 60 Minutes. Retrieved from http://www.cbsnews.com/news/candidate-obamas-sense-of-urgency/

Cayer

N. J.

Sigelman

(1980). Minorities and women in state and local government: 1973-1975. Public Administration Review, 47, 443-450. Available from http://www.jstor.org/

Choi

(2011). Diversity and representation in the U.S. federal government: Analysis of the trends of federal employment. Public Personnel Management, 40(1), 25-46. doi:10.1177/009102601104000103

Clark

R. C.

Jr. Ochs

H. L.

Frazier

(2013). Representative bureaucracy: The politics of access to policy-making positions in the federal executive service. Public Personnel Management, 42(1), 75-89. doi:10.1177/0091026013484570

Corley

P. C.

(2006). Avoiding advice and consent: Recess appointments and presidential power. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 36, 670-680. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5705.2006.02573.x

10.

Cornwell

Kellough

J. E.

(1994). Women and minorities in federal government agencies: Examining new evidence from panel data. Public Administration Review, 54, 265-276. doi:10.2307/976730

11.

Crumpacker

J. M.

(2008). The U.S. Federal Senior Executive Service (SES) and gender diversity: Would proposed legislation enhancing the representational diversity of selection panels necessarily increase the number of female appointments to the SES? Public Personnel Management, 37, 417-433. doi:10.1177/009102600803700404

12.

Daughton

S. M.

(1994). Women’s issues, women’s place: Gender-related problems in presidential campaigns. Communication Quarterly, 42, 106-119. doi:10.1080/01463379409369920

13.

Defense Equal Opportunity Management Institute. (2000, June). Building and maintaining a diverse, high-quality workforce: A guide for federal agencies. Retrieved from https://www.deomi.org/DiversityMgmt/documents/OPMDiversityGuide2000.pdf

14.

Dolan

(2000). The Senior Executive Service: Gender, attitudes, and representative bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 513-529. Available from http://www.oxfordjournals.org/

15.

Dolan

(2001). Political appointees in the United Sates: Does gender make a difference? Political Science and Politics, 34, 213-216. doi:10.1017/S1049096501000336

16.

Dolan

(2002). Representative bureaucracy in the federal executive: Gender and spending priorities. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12, 353-375. Available from http://www.oxfordjournals.org/

17.

Eisinger

P. K.

(1982). Black employment in municipal jobs: The impact of black political power. American Political Science Review, 76, 380-392. Available from http://www.jstor.org/

18.

Ford

P. K.

Johnson

T. A.

Maxwell

(2010). “Yes we can” or “yes we did?” Prospective and retrospective change in the Obama presidency. Journal of Black Studies, 40, 462-483. doi:10.1177/0021934709352081

19.

Fraser

(2009). Race, postblack politics, and the Democratic presidential candidacy of Barack Obama. In Marable

Clarke

(Eds.), Barack Obama and African American empowerment (pp. 163-182). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

20.

Goldman

(2009). Obama and the Federal Judiciary: Great expectations but will he have a dickens of a time living up to them? The Forum, 7(1). doi:10.2202/1540-8884.1294

21.

Grabosky

P. N.

Rosenbloom

D. H.

(1975). Racial and ethnic integration in the federal government service. Social Science Quarterly, 56(1), 71-84. Available from http://www.jstor.org/

22.

Guajardo

S. A.

(1996). Minority employment in federal agencies: Continuity and change. Public Personnel Management, 25, 199-208. doi:10.1177/009102609602500206

23.

Guy

M. E.

(1993). Three steps forward, two steps backward: The status of women’s integration into public management. Public Administration Review, 53, 285-292. Available from http://www.jstor.org/

24.

Hale

M. M.

Branch

M. F.

(1992). Policy preferences on workplace reform. In Guy

M. E.

(Ed.), Women and men of the states: Public administrators at the state level (pp. 189-204). New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

25.

Harris

F. C.

(2014). The rise of respectability politics. Dissent, 61(1), 33-37. Available from https://www.ebscohost.com/

26.

Henderson

(2014, December 3). “Black respectability” politics are increasingly absent from Obama’s rhetoric. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2014/12/03/black-respectability-politics-are-increasingly-absent-from-obamas-rhetoric/

27.

Hollibaugh

G. E.

Horton

Lewis

D. E.

(2014). Presidents and patronage. American Journal of Political Science, 58, 1024-1042. doi:10.1111/ajps.12083

28.

Hsieh

Winslow

(2006). Gender representation in the federal workforce: A comparison among groups. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 26, 276-294. doi:10.1177/0734371X05281785

29.

Hutchings

V. L.

Valentino

N. A.

Philpot

T. S.

White

I. K.

(2004). The compassion strategy race and the gender gap in campaign 2000. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68(4), 512-541.

30.

Ifill

(1992a, December 21). 3 Women are said to be candidates for cabinet posts. Available from http://www.nytimes.com/

31.

Ifill

(1992b, December 7). The transition; Clinton’s high stakes shuffle to get the right cabinet mix. Available from http://www.nytimes.com/

32.

Jenkins

K. B.

Cos

(2010). A time for change and a candidate’s voice: Pragmatism and the rhetoric of inclusion in Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign. American Behavioral Scientist, 54, 184-202. doi:10.1177/0002764210381706

33.

Keiser

L. R.

Wilkins

V. M.

Meier

K. J.

Holland

C. A.

(2002). Lipstick and logarithms: Gender, institutional context, and representative bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 96, 553-564. doi:10.1017/S0003055402000321

34.

Kellough

J. E.

(1990). Integration in the public workplace: Determinants of minority and female employment in federal agencies. Public Administration Review, 50, 557-566. doi:10.2307/976786

35.

Kelly

R. M.

Newman

M. A.

(2001). The gendered bureaucracy: Agency mission, equality of opportunity, and representative bureaucracies. Women and Politics, 22(3), 1-33. doi:10.1300/J014v22n03_01

36.

Kenski

Tisinger

(2006). Hispanic voters in the 2000 and 2004 presidential general elections. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 36, 189-202. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5705.2006.00298.x

37.

Killian

(2008). Presidential decision making and minority nominations to the U.S. Courts of Appeals. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 38, 268-283. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5705.2008.02639.x

38.

Kim

C. K.

(2003a). Representation policy outputs: Examining the linkage between passive and active representation. Public Personal Management, 32, 549-559. doi:10.1177/009102600303200406

39.

Kim

C. K.

(2003b). The effects of a president’s party on federal senior executive employment: An empirical analysis on representative bureaucracy. Administration and Society, 35, 160-183. doi:10.1177/0095399703035002003

40.

Kim

P. S.

Lewis

G. B.

(1994). Asian Americans in the public service: Success, diversity, and discrimination. Public Administration Review, 54, 285-290. Available from http://www.jstor.org/

41.

King

J. D.

Riddlesperger

J. W.

(1996). Presidential management and staffing: An early assessment of the Clinton presidency. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 26, 496-510. Available from http://www.jstor.org/

42.

Kingsley

J. D.

(1944). Representative Bureaucracy. Yellow Springs, OH: Antioch Press.

43.

Krislov

(1974). Representative Bureaucracy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

44.

Lewis

D. E.

(2005). Staffing alone: Unilateral action and the politicization of the executive office of the President, 1988-2004. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 35, 496-514. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5705.2005.00261.x

45.

Lewis

D. E.

(2007, September). Presidents and the politicization of the United States federal government, 1988-2004. Paper presented at the annual meeting for the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.

46.

Lewis

D. E.

(2009). Revisiting the administrative presidency: Policy, patronage, and agency competence. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 39(1), 60-73. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5705.2008.03658.x

47.

Lewis

D. E.

(2011). Presidential appointments and personnel. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 47-66. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-042009-121225

48.

Lipset

S. M.

(1950). Agrarian socialism. Berkeley: University of California Press.

49.

Meier

K. J.

Bohte

(2001). Structure and discretion: Missing links in representative bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11, 455-470. Available from http://www.jstor.org/

50.

Meier

K. J.

Nigro

L. G.

(1976). Representative bureaucracy and policy preferences: A study in the attitudes of federal executives. Public Administration Review, 36, 458-469. Available from http://www.jstor.org/

51.

Meier

K. J.

Stewart

Jr. (1992). The impact of representative bureaucracies: Educational systems and public policies. The American Review of Public Administration, 22, 157-171. doi:10.1177/027507409202200301

52.

Moe

T. M.

(1985). The politicized presidency. In Chubb

J. E.

Preston

P. E.

(Eds.), New direction in American politics (pp. 235-271). Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.

53.

Mosher

F. C.

(1982). Democracy and the public service. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

54.

Moynihan

D. P.

Roberts

A. S.

(2010). The triumph of loyalty over competence: The Bush administration and the exhaustion of the politicized presidency. Public Administration Review, 70, 572-581. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02178.x

55.

Naff

K. C.

(1994). Through the glass ceiling: Prospects for the advancement of women in the federal government. Public Administration Review, 54, 507-514. Available from http://www.jstor.org/

56.

Naff

K. C.

(2001). To look like America: Dismantling barriers for women in government. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

57.

Naff

K. C.

Crum

(2000). The president and representative bureaucracy: Rhetoric and reality. Public Administration Review, 60, 98-110. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00069

58.

Neal

T. M.

(2004, December 23). Diversity and the bush cabinet. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A22082-2004Dec23_2.html

59.

Obama

B. H.

(2008). A more perfect union. The Black Scholar, 38(1), 17-23. doi:10.1080/00064246.2008.11413431

60.

Orey

B. D. A.

Ricks

B. E.

(2007). A systematic analysis of the deracialization concept. The Expanding Boundaries of Black Politics, 11, 325-334. Available from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/

61.

Page

(2004, December 9). Bush is opening doors with a diverse cabinet. USA Today. Retrieved from http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/washington/2004-12-09-diverse-usat_x.htm

62.

Rho’Dess

(2011). From hope to change? Obama’s 2008 deracialized campaign in the context of the African American struggle. Race, Gender & Class, 18, 110-122. Available from http://search.proquest.com/

63.

Riccucci

N. M.

(2009). The pursuit of social equity in the federal government: A road less traveled? Public Administration Review, 69, 373-382. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.01984.x

64.

Riccucci

N. M.

Saidel

J. R.

(1997). The representativeness of state-level bureaucratic leaders: A missing piece of the representative bureaucracy puzzle. Public Administration Review, 57, 423-430. doi:10.2307/3109988

65.

Rosenbloom

D. H.

(1984). What have policy studies told us about affirmative action and where can we go from here? Policy Studies Review, 4(1), 43-48. Available from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/

66.

Rosenbloom

D. H.

Featherstonhaugh

J. G.

(1977). Passive and active representation in the federal service: A comparison of Blacks and Whites. Social Science Quarterly, 58, 873-882. Available from http://www.jstor.org/

67.

Sabharwal

(2015). From glass ceiling to glass cliff: Women in senior executive service. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25, 399-426. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut030

68.

Saidel

J. R.

Loscocco

(2005). Agency leaders, gendered institutions, and representative bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 65, 158-170. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00441.x

69.

Schaffner

B. F.

(2005). Priming gender: Campaigning on women’s issues in US Senate elections. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 803-817. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00156.x

70.

Segal

J. A.

(2000). Representative decision making on the federal bench: Clinton’s district court appointees. Political Research Quarterly, 53, 137-150. doi:10.1177/106591290005300107

71.

Selden

S. C.

Brudney

J. L.

Kellough

J. E.

(1998). Bureaucracy as a representative institution: Toward a reconciliation of bureaucratic government and democratic theory. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 719-744. Available from www.jstor.org

72.

Senior

(2015, October 7). The paradox of the first Black President. New York Magazine. Retrieved from http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2015/10/paradox-of-the-first-black-president.html

73.

Sinclair-Chapman

Price

(2008). Black politics, the 2008 election, and the (im) possibility of race transcendence. PS: Political Science and Politics, 41, 739-745. doi:10.1017/S1049096508080992

74.

Smith

R. M.

King

D. S.

(2009). Barack Obama and the future of American racial politics. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 6(01), 25-35. doi:10.1017/S1742058X09090158

75.

Sneed

B. G.

(2007). Glass walls in state bureaucracy: Examining the differences departmental function can make. Public Administration Review, 67, 880-891. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00775.x

76.

Sowa

J. E.

Selden

S. C.

(2003). Administrative discretion and active representation: An expansion of the theory of representative bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 63, 700-710. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00333

77.

Thompson

F. J.

(1976). Minority groups in public bureaucracies are passive and active representation linked? Administration and Society, 8, 201-226. doi:10.1177/009539977600800206

78.

Tobias

(2010). Diversity and the federal bench. Washington University Law Review, 87, 1197-1211. Retrieved from http://openscholarship.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1106&context=law_lawreview

79.

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2010). Annual report on the federal work force Part I: EEO complaints processing. Retrieved from http://www.eeoc.gov/federal/reports/fsp2010/upload/FY-2010-Annual-Report-Part-I-EEO-Complaint-Processing.pdf

80.

Villalobos

J. D.

(2011). Staff of the people? Assessing progress in descriptive representation under the Obama administration. Race, Gender and Class, 18(3-4), 28-53. Available from http://connection.ebscohost.com/

81.

Wilkins

V. M.

Keiser

L. R.

(2004). Linking passive and active representation by gender: The case of child support agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 87-102. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui023

82.

Wilkins

V. M.

Williams

B. N.

(2008). Black or blue: Racial profiling and representative bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 68, 654-664. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00905.x

83.

Wilkins

V. M.

Williams

B. N.

(2009). Representing blue representative bureaucracy and racial profiling in the Latino community. Administration & Society, 40, 775-798. doi:10.1177/0095399708326332