We examine how a good faith effort at collaboration with Native peoples in the regulation of white-fronted geese in North America nonetheless resulted in their marginalization. Our investigation explores how dramatically different ways of knowing are articulated and contested in a complex, structurally differentiated, and highly professionalized institutional setting—the Migratory Bird Management Regime of North America. We find local knowledge emerging among and being legible to the street-level administrators of the management regime, but unable to penetrate regional management, where methodological commitments reinforced existing problem frames and administrative objectives.
AdamsG. B. (1992). Enthralled with modernity: The historical context of knowledge and theory development in public administration. Public Administration Review, 52, 363-373.
AgranoffR. (2006). Inside collaborative networks: Ten lessons for public administration. Public Administration Review, 66(Special Issue), 56-65.
4.
AlcornJ. (1993). Indigenous peoples and conservation. Conservation Biology, 7, 424-426.
5.
AlisauskasR. T.LindbergM. S. (2002). Effects of neckbands on survival and fidelity of white-fronted and Canada geese captured as non-breeding adults. Journal of Applied Statistics, 291, 521-537.
6.
AndersonD. (2001). The need to get the basics right in wildlife field studies. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 294, 1294-1297.
7.
AndersonD.CoochE.GutierrezR. J.KrebsC.LindbergM.PollockK.. . . ShenkT. M. (2003). Rigorous science: Suggestions on how to raise the bar. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 311, 296-305.
8.
Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) of December 18, 1971, P.L. 93-203, 85 Stat. 689, 43 USCA 1601 et seq.
9.
Alaska Natural Interest Land Claims Act (ANILCA). 1980. P.L. 96-487, 94 Stat. 2435, 43 USCA 1634. December 2, 1980.
10.
AnsellC.GashA. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 543-571.
11.
Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. (2004). Impacts of a warming Arctic: Arctic climate impact assessment (Arctic Council). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
AttlaC. (with SpindlerM.). (1995, April27). Oral historyH96-20. Raven’s Stories Collection, Rasmuson Library, University of Alaska Fairbanks.
13.
AttlaS. (with SpindlerM.). (1995, April28). Oral historyH96-19. Raven’s Stories Collection, Rasmuson Library, University of Alaska Fairbanks.
14.
BellroseF. (1980). Ducks, geese, and swans of North America. Harrisburg, PA: Wildlife Management Institute.
15.
BerkesF. (1999). Sacred ecology: Traditional ecological knowledge and resource management. London, England: Taylor & Francis.
16.
BlackmanM. (1990). Sadie Brower Neakok, an Inupiaq woman. Seattle: University of Washington.
17.
BrodkinE. Z. (2011). Policy work: Street-level organizations under new managerialism. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 253-277.
18.
BrodkinE. Z. (2012). Reflections on street level bureaucracy: Past, present, and future. Public Administration Review, 72, 940-949.
19.
BryantJ. (1994). U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service: Koyukuk/Nowitna NWR, Galena, Alaska Information Sheet. Galena, AK: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
20.
CashD. W.ClarkW. C.AlcockF.DicksonN. M.EckleyN.GustonD. H. (2003). Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 8086-8089.
21.
ChapinF. S.McGuireA. D.RuessR. W.HollingsworthT. N.MackM. C.JohnstoneJ. F.TaylorD. L. (2010). Resilience of Alaska’s boreal forest to climatic change. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 40, 1360-1370.
22.
ChrislipD. D.LarsonC. (1994). Collaborative leadership: How citizens and civic leaders can make a difference. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
23.
CohnJ. (2005). After the divorce: Improving science at federal wildlife agencies. BioScience, 551, 10-14.
24.
CookB. J. (2010). The organ of experience: A defense of the primacy of public administrators in the design and reform of policy and law. Administration & Society, 42, 263-286.
25.
CorburnJ. (2005). Street science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26.
DeloriaV.Jr.LytleC. M. (1998). The nations within: The past and future of American Indian sovereignty. Austin: University of Texas Press.
27.
DenhardtR. B. (1981). In the shadow of organization. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
28.
DryzekJ. S.NiemeyerS. (2010). Foundations and frontiers of deliberative governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
29.
DurantR. F.AliS. B. (2012). Repositioning American public administration? Citizen estrangement, administrative reform, and the disarticulated state. Public Administration Review, 73, 278-289.
30.
ElyC. R.DzubinA. (1994). Greater white-fronted goose (Anser albifrons). In PooleA.GillF. (Eds.), The birds of North America (p. 131). Philadelphia, PA: Academy of Natural Sciences.
31.
EmersonK.NabatchiT.BaloghS. (2011). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 1-29.
32.
FischerF. (1990). Technocracy and the politics of expertise. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
33.
FischerF. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford, UK: Oxford Press.
34.
FischerF. (2009). Democracy and expertise: Reorienting policy inquiry. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
35.
FischerJ. (2006). Mid-continent greater white-fronted geese in Alaska—2005 project updates. Unpublished report, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Migratory Bird Management, Anchorage, AK.
36.
ForesterJ. (1989). Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
37.
FoxC. J.MillerH. T. (1996). Postmodern public administration: Toward discourse. London, England: Sage.
38.
FrickerM. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
39.
GerlackA. K.HeikkilaT. (2014). Building a theory of learning in collaboratives: Evidence from the Everglades restoration program. Journal of Public Administration: Research and Theory, 21, 619-644.
40.
HaasP. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1-35.
HardingS. (1998). Is science multicultural? Postcolonialisms, feminisms, and epistemologies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
43.
HodgesJ. (1993). Count—A simulation for learning to estimate wildlife numbers. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 21, 96-97.
44.
HowittR. (2001). Rethinking resource management: Justice, sustainability, and indigenous peoples. New York, NY: Routledge.
45.
HummelR. P. (1982). The bureaucratic experience (2nd ed.). New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
46.
HuntingtonH. (2000). Using traditional ecological knowledge in science: Methods and applications. Ecological Applications, 105, 1270-1274.
47.
HuntingtonO. H.WatsonA. (2012). Interdisciplinarity, native resilience, and how the riddles can teach wildlife law in an era of rapid climate change. Wicazo Sa Review, 27(2), 49-73.
48.
InnesJ. E.BooherD. E. (2010). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. London, England: Routledge.
49.
JasanoffS. (1995). Procedural choices in regulatory science. Technology in Society, 17, 279-293.
50.
JasanoffS. (2004). The idiom of co-production. In JasanoffS. (Ed.), States of knowledge: The co-production of science and the social order (pp. 1-12). New York, NY: Routledge.
51.
JohnsonN. J.SvaraJ. H. (2011). Justice for all: Promoting social equity in public administration. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
52.
JohnstonE. W.HicksD.NanN.AuerJ. (2011). Managing the inclusion process in collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 699-721.
53.
JosP. H.TompkinsM. E. (1995). Administrative practice and the waning promise of professionalism for public administration. American Review of Public Administration, 25, 207-229.
54.
KettlD. F. (2009). The key to networked government. In GoldsmithS.KettlD. F. (Eds.), Unlocking the power of networks: Keys to high performance government (pp. 1-14). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
55.
KingdonJ. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives and public policies. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
56.
KofinasG. P.ChapinF. S.BurnSilverS.SchmidtJ. I.FrescoN. L.KiellandK.RuppT. S. (2010). Resilience of Athabascan subsistence systems to interior Alaska’s changing climate. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 40, 1347-1359.
57.
KohlerR. E. (2002). Landscapes and labscapes: Exploring the lab-field border in biology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
58.
KultgenJ. (1988). Ethics and professionalism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
59.
LatourB. (1986). Visualization and cognition: Thinking with eyes and hands. Knowledge and Society, 6, 1-40.
60.
LatourB. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61.
LatourB. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
62.
LatourB.WoolgarS. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
63.
LeachW. D. (2011). Building a theory of collaboration. In DukesE. F.FirehockK. E.BirkhoffJ. E. (Eds.), Community-based collaboration: Bridging socio-ecological research and practice (pp. 146-188). Charlottesville: University of Virginia.
64.
LeibermanJ. (1972). The tyranny of expertise. New York, NY: Walker.
65.
LindE. A. (2001). Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments are pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In GreenburgJ.CropanzoR. (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 56-88). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Press.
66.
LipskyM. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
67.
LivingstoneD. N. (2010). Putting science in its place: Geographies of scientific knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
68.
MargerumR. D. (2011). Beyond consensus: Improving collaborative planning and management. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
69.
MarksD.FischerJ. (2012). Alaska midcontinent greater white-fronted geese—Project updates, 2010-2011 (Field Seasons). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Migratory Bird Management, Waterfowl Management Branch. Retrieved from http://alaska.fws.gov/mbsp/mbm/waterfowl/surveys/pdf/ak_gwfg_projects.pdf
70.
Maynard-MoodyS.MushenoM. (2012). Social equities and inequities in practice: Street level workers as agents and pragmatists. Public Administration Review, 72(Suppl. 1), S16-S23.
McNeeleyS.SchultzkiM. (2011). Anatomy of a closing window: Vulnerability to changing seasonality in Interior Alaska. Global Environmental Change, 21, 464-473.
NabatchiT.GastilJ.WeiksnerG. M.LeighningerM. (2012). Democracy in motion: Evaluating the practice and impact of deliberative civic engagement. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
75.
NadasdyP. (2003). Hunters and bureaucrats: Power, knowledge, and Aboriginal-State relations in the southwest Yukon. Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia Press.
76.
NelsonR. K. (1982). Make prayers to the raven: A Koyukon view of the northern forest. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
77.
O’ConnorR. (2000). Why ecology lags behind biology. The Scientist, 1420-1435.
78.
O’LearyR.Van SlykeD. M.KimS. (Eds.). (2010). The future of public administration around the world: The Minnowbrook perspective. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
79.
PestoffV.BrandedT.VerschuereB. (2012). New public governance, the third sector, and co-production. New York, NY: Routledge.
80.
PollockK.KendallW. (1987). Visibility bias in aerial surveys: A review of estimation procedures. Journal of Wildlife Management, 512, 502-510.
81.
ReinM. W.LawsD. (1999, June22). Controversy, reframing and reflection. Paper presented at a Conference on Theory, Policy, and Society, University of Leiden, The Netherlands.
SalmónE. (2000). Kincentric ecology: Indigenous perceptions of the human-nature relationship. Ecological Applications, 105, 1327-1332.
84.
SchönD. A.ReinM. (1994). Frame reflection. New York, NY: Basic Books.
85.
ScottJ. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Princeton University Press.
86.
SeidmanH.GilmourR. (1986). Politics, position, and power: From the positive to the regulatory state (4th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
87.
SpindlerM.MartinP. (2001, April). Summer movements of white-fronted geese that nest in the Taiga of northwestern Interior Alaska. North American Arctic Goose Conference, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Galena, AK.
88.
StiversC. (2011). Administration and the limits of democracy: The space of 19th century American governance. Administration & Society, 43, 623-642.
89.
StoneD. (1993). Clinical authority in the construction of citizenship. In IngramH.SmithS. R. (Eds.), Public policy for democracy (pp. 45-67). Washington, DC: Brookings.
90.
StoneD. (1997). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
91.
TaylorF. (1911, March). The gospel of efficiency: A new science of business management. American Magazine, p. LXXI.
92.
ThomasC. W. (2003). Bureaucratic landscapes: Interagency cooperation and the preservation of biodiversity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
93.
TorgersonD. (1999). The promise of green politics: Environmentalism and the public sphere. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
94.
Tuhiwai-SmithL. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. London, England: Zed Books.
95.
United States Census Bureau/American FactFinder. (2010). 2010 census. U.S. Census Bureau. Available from http://factfinder2.census.gov
96.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (1998). Digest of federal resource laws of interest to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918). Author. Retrieved from http://www.fws.gov/laws/lawsdigest/migtrea.html
97.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (2005a). Management plan for midcontinent greater white-fronted geese. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior.
98.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (2005b). Waterfowl population status, 2005. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior.
99.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (2006). Waterfowl population status. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior.
100.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (n.d.). A blueprint for the future of migratory birds: Migratory bird program strategic plan 2004-2014. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior.
101.
WaldoD. (1948). The administrative state. New York, NY: Ronald Press.
102.
WatsonA. (2013). Misunderstanding the “nature” of co-management: A geography of regulatory science and Indigenous knowledges. Environmental Management, 52, 1085-1102.
103.
WatsonA.HuntingtonO. H.NedS.MachucaN.HokeJ. (2014, May). Traditional ecological knowledge of Moose, other wildlife species, and climate change in Allakaket/Alatna. Alaska: National Park Service.
104.
WatsonA.HuntingtonO. H. (2008). They’re here—I can feel them: The epistemic spaces of indigenous and western knowledges. Social & Cultural Geography, 93, 257-280.
105.
WatsonA.TillK. (2010). Ethnography and participant-observation. In DeLyserD.CrangH. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research in human geography (pp. 121-237). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
106.
WeberM. (1946). Politics as a vocation. In GerthH. H.MillsC. W. (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (pp. 77-128). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
107.
WeberM. (1968). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (3 Vols.). New York, NY: Bedminster Press.
108.
WhiteD. D.WutichA.LarsonK. L.GoberP.LantT.SennevilleC. (2010). Credibility, salience, & legitimacy of boundary objects: Water managers’ assessment of a simulation model in an immersive decision theatre. Science & Public Policy, 37, 219-232.
109.
YeungL. (2000). Meaningful community involvement in protected area issues: A dialogue session. In McCoolF.StephenColeN.DavidBorrieT.WilliamO’LoughlinJ. (Eds.), Wilderness science in a time of change conference—Volume 2: Wilderness within the context of larger systems (pp. 301-307). Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
