If You Are Committed,Then so Am I: The Role of Social Networks and Social Influence on Organizational Commitment

Abstract

Research on organizational commitment has generally ignored the role that social networks may play in shaping work-related attitudes. In this article, we explore two network-based mechanisms: (a) structural position effects, based on centrality, and (b) social influence, based on direct social contact with peers. Relying on network, survey, and administrative data for more than 400 employees in 21 different organizations, our findings suggest that both structural position and social influence are associated with organizational commitment. These findings have important implications for how public organizations structure work teams, hire and promote employees, and engage in reform efforts.

Keywords

organizational commitment social influence social networks public schools teachers

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alliance for Excellent Education. (2014). On the path to equity: Improving the effectiveness of beginning teachers. Washington, DC: Author.

Balfour

D. L.

Wechsler

(1996). Organizational commitment: Antecedents and outcomes in public organizations. Public Productivity & Management Review, 19, 256-277. doi:10.2307/3380574

Becker

B. J.

M.-J.

(2007). The synthesis of regression slopes in meta-analysis. Statistical Science, 22, 414-429.

Brass

D. J.

Krackhardt

(1999). The social capital of twenty-first century leaders. In Hunt

J. G.

Dodge

G. E.

Wong

(Eds.), Out-of-the box leadership challenges for the 21st century army and other top performing organizations (pp. 179-194). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.

Burt

R. S.

(1987). Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1287-1335. doi:10.2307/2779839

Burt

R. S.

(2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Butts

C. T.

(2003). Network inference, error, and informant (in)accuracy: A Bayesian approach. Social Networks, 25, 103-140.

Carley

K. M.

Krackhardt

(1996). Cognitive inconsistencies and non-symmetric friendship. Social Networks, 18(1), 1-27.

Crewson

P. E.

(1997). Public-service motivation: Building empirical evidence of incidence and effect. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7, 499-518.

10.

Cross

Parker

Sasson

(Eds.). (2003). Networks in the knowledge economy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

11.

Daly

A. J.

Finnigan

K. S.

(2011). The ebb and flow of social network ties between district leaders under high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 39-79. doi:10.3102/0002831210368990

12.

Daly

A. J.

Moolenaar

N. M.

Bolivar

J. M.

Burke

(2010). Relationships in reform: The role of teachers’ social networks. Journal of Education Administration, 48, 359-391.

13.

Doreian

Teuter

Wang

C.-H.

(1984). Network autocorrelation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 13, 155-200. doi:10.1177/0049124184013002001

14.

Erickson

B. H.

(1988). The relational basis of attitudes. In Wellman

Berkowitz

S. D.

(Eds.), Social structures: A network approach (pp. 99-121). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

15.

Fowles

Butler

J. S.

Cowen

J. M.

Streams

M. E.

Toma

E. F.

(2014). Public employee quality in a geographic context: A study of rural teachers. The American Review of Public Administration, 44, 503-521. doi:10.1177/0275074012474714

16.

Friedkin

N. E.

(1984). Structural cohesion and equivalence explanations of social homogeneity. Sociological Methods & Research, 12, 235-261. doi:10.1177/0049124184012003001

17.

Friedkin

N. E.

Johnsen

E. C.

(2011). Social influence network theory: A sociological examination of small group dynamics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

18.

Gibbons

D. E.

(2004). Friendship and advice networks in the context of changing professional values. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 238-262. doi:10.2307/4131473

19.

Grosser

T. J.

Lopez-Kidwell

Labianca

(2010). A social network analysis of positive and negative gossip in organizational life. Group & Organization Management, 35, 177-212. doi:10.1177/1059601109360391

20.

Hanneman

Riddle

(2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside: University of California.

21.

Harris

D. N.

Ingle

W. K.

Rutledge

S. A.

(2014). How teacher evaluation methods matter for accountability: A comparative analysis of teacher effectiveness ratings by principals and teacher value-added measures. American Educational Research Journal, 51, 73-112. doi:10.3102/0002831213517130

22.

Hartman

R. L.

Johnson

J. D.

(1989). Social contagion and multiplexity communication networks as predictors of commitment and role ambiguity. Human Communication Research, 15, 523-548. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1989.tb00198.x

23.

Honaker

King

Blackwell

(2011). Amelia II: A program for missing data. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(7), 1-47.

24.

Ibarra

(1993). Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. The Academy of Management Journal, 36, 471-501.

25.

Ibarra

Andrews

S. B.

(1993). Power, social influence, and sense making: Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 277-303. doi:10.2307/2393414

26.

Jones

Volpe

E. H.

(2011). Organizational identification: Extending our understanding of social identities through social networks. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 413-434. doi:10.1002/job.694

27.

Kilduff

Krackhardt

(2008). Interpersonal networks in organizations: Cognition, personality, dynamics, and culture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

28.

Krackhardt

Kilduff

(1999). Whether closer or far: Social distance effects on perceived balance in friendship networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 770-782.

29.

Lazega

Pattison

P. E.

(1999). Multiplexity, generalized exchange and cooperation in organizations: A case study. Social Networks, 21, 67-90. doi:10.1016/S0378-8733(99)00002-7

30.

Lee

Kim

(2011). Exploring the role of social networks in affective organizational commitment: Network centrality, strength of ties, and structural holes. The American Review of Public Administration, 41, 205-223. doi:10.1177/0275074010373803

31.

Leenders

R. T. A. J.

(2002). Modeling social influence through network autocorrelation: Constructing the weight matrix. Social Networks, 24, 21-47.

32.

Marsden

P. V.

Friedkin

N. E.

(1993). Network studies of social influence. Sociological Methods & Research, 22, 127-151.

33.

Mathieu

J. E.

Zajac

D. M.

(1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171-194. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.171

34.

Meyer

J. P.

Allen

N. J.

(1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61-89. doi:10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z

35.

Meyer

J. P.

Paunonen

S. V.

Gellatly

I. R.

Goffin

R. D.

Jackson

D. N.

(1989). Organizational commitment and job performance: It’s the nature of the commitment that counts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 152-156.

36.

Meyer

J. P.

Stanley

D. J.

Herscovitch

Topolnytsky

(2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20-52. doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842

37.

Moolenaar

N. M.

Sleegers

P. J. C.

(2010). Social networks, trust, and innovation: The role of relationships in supporting innovative climate in Dutch schools. In Daly

A. J.

(Ed.), Social network theory and educational change (pp. 97-114). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

38.

Mowday

R. T.

Porter

L. W.

Steers

R. M.

(1982). Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism and turnover. New York, NY: Academic Press.

39.

Moynihan

D. P.

Pandey

S. K.

(2007). Finding workable levers over work motivation: Comparing job satisfaction, job involvement, and organizational commitment. Administration & Society, 39, 803-832. doi:10.1177/0095399707305546

40.

Moynihan

D. P.

Pandey

S. K.

(2008). The ties that bind: Social networks, person-organization value fit, and turnover intention. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 205-227. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum013

41.

Mueller

C. W.

Finley

Iverson

R. D.

Price

J. L.

(1999). The effects of group racial composition on job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and career commitment: The case of teachers. Work and Occupations, 26, 187-219. doi:10.1177/0730888499026002003

42.

O’Malley

A. J.

Marsden

(2008). The analysis of social networks. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 8, 222-269. doi:10.1007/s10742-008-0041-z

43.

Park

S. M.

Rainey

H. G.

(2007). Antecedents, mediators, and consequences of affective, normative, and continuance commitment: Empirical tests of commitment effects in federal agencies. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 27, 197-226. doi:10.1177/0734371x06296866

44.

Partnership for Public Service. (2012). Bracing for change: Chief human capital officers rethink business as usual. Retrieved from http://ourpublicservice.org/publications/viewcontentdetails.php?id=47

45.

Partnership for Public Service. (2013). Ten years of the Best Places to Work in the Federal Government rankings. Retrieved from http://ourpublicservice.org/publications/viewcontentdetails.php?id=23

46.

Porter

L. W.

Steers

R. M.

Mowday

R. T.

Boulian

P. V.

(1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 603-609.

47.

Postmes

Tanis

de Wit

(2001). Communication and commitment in organizations: A social identity approach. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 4, 227-246. doi:10.1177/1368430201004003004

48.

Rhodes

S. R.

Steers

R. M.

(1981). Conventional vs. worker-owned organizations. Human Relations, 34, 1013-1035. doi:10.1177/001872678103401201

49.

Roberts

K. H.

O’Reilly

C. A.

III. (1979). Some correlations of communication roles in organizations. The Academy of Management Journal, 22, 42-57.

50.

Roethlisberger

F. J.

Dickson

W. J.

(1939). Management and the worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

51.

Rosenholtz

S. J.

(1991). Teachers’ workplace: The social organization of schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

52.

Salancik

G. R.

Pfeffer

(1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224-253. doi:10.2307/2392563

53.

Shalizi

C. R.

Thomas

A. C.

(2010). Homophily and contagion are generically confounded in observational social network studies. Sociological Methods and Research, 40, 211-239.

54.

Somech

Bogler

(2002). Antecedents and consequences of teacher organizational and professional commitment. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 555-577. doi:10.1177/001316102237672

55.

Steers

R. M.

(1977). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 46-56. doi:10.2307/2391745

56.

Steijn

Leisink

(2006). Organizational commitment among Dutch public sector employees. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 72, 187-201. doi:10.1177/0020852306064609

57.

Stevens

J. M.

Beyer

J. M.

Trice

H. M.

(1978). Assessing personal, role, and organizational predictors of managerial commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 21, 380-396. doi:10.2307/255721

58.

Wang

Neuman

E. J.

Newman

D. A.

(2014). Statistical power of the social network autocorrelation model. Social Networks, 38, 88-99. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2014.03.004

59.

Wasserman

Faust

(1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

60.

Zagenczyk

Murrell

(2009). It is better to receive than to give: Advice network effects on job and work-unit attachment. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24, 139-152. doi:10.1007/s10869-009-9095-3