This qualitative study analyzes an Italian hospital’s endeavor to introduce a coproduction practice and the critical factors that affect its efficacy and efficiency. The empirical evidence shows that the meaningful engagement of the patient can be achieved only by factoring in the socioorganizational conditions of all stakeholders; that no divide exists between organizational production and client coproduction, rather, it is a relationship of interdependence that in turn raises critical issues; and that formalized and effective “practices-in-use” cannot work unless there is strong managerial commitment and enforcement of the new coproduction initiative.
AlfordJ. (2002). Why do public sector clients co-produce? Towards a contingency theory. Administration & Society, 34, 32-56. doi:10.1177/0095399702034001004
2.
AlfordJ.O’FlynnJ. (2012). Rethinking public service delivery. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
3.
AndersonG. F.HusseyP. S. (2000). Population aging: A comparison among industrialized countries. Health Affairs, 19, 191-203. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.19.3.191
4.
AndrewsR.BoyneG. A.MeierK. J.O’TooleL. J.WalkerR. M. (2011). Environmental and organizational determinants of external networking. The American Review of Public Administration, 41, 355-374. doi:10.1177/0275074010382036
5.
BifulcoR.LaddH. F. (2006). Institutional change and coproduction of public services: The effect of charter schools on parental involvement. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 553-576. doi:10.1093/jopart/muj001
6.
BovairdT. (2004). Public-private partnerships: From contested concepts to prevalent practice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 70, 199-215. doi:10.1177/0020852304044250
7.
BovairdT. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67, 846-860. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x
8.
BovairdT.LoefflerE. (2012). From engagement to co-production: The contribution of users and communities to outcomes and public value. Voluntas, 23, 1119-1138. doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9309-6
9.
BoyleD.ClarkeS.BurnsS. (2006). Aspects of co-production: The implications for work, health and volunteering. London, England: New Economics Foundation.
10.
BradyT. J.MurphyL.O’ColmainB. J.BeauchesneD.DanielsB.GreenbergM.. . . ChervinD. (2013). A meta-analysis of health status, health behaviors, and healthcare utilization outcomes of the chronic disease self-management program. Preventing Chronic Disease. Advance online publication. doi:10.5888/pcd10.120112
11.
BrandsenT.PestoffV. (2006). Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services. Public Management Review, 8, 493-501. doi:10.1080/14719030601022874
12.
ChapmanA. L. (2013). Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy in a changing NHS: challenges and opportunities. Clinical Medicine, 13(1), 35-36.
13.
ChapmanA. L.DixonS.AndrewsD.LillieP. J.BazazR.PatchettJ. D. (2009). Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT): A UK perspective. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 64, 1316-1324. doi:10.1093/jac/dkp343
14.
ClarkB. Y.BrudneyJ. L.JangS.-G. (2013). Coproduction of government services and the new information technology: Investigating the distributional biases. Public Administration Review, 73, 687-701. doi:10.1111/puar.12092
15.
CoulterA. (2011). Engaging patients in healthcare. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
16.
CoulterA. (2012). Patient engagement—What works?The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, 35, 80-89. doi:10.1097/JAC.0b013e318249e0fd
17.
CoulterA.ParsonsS.AskhamJ. (2008). Where are the patients in decision-making about their own care?Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe.
18.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (2009). Qualitative research. Yogyakarta: PustakaPelajar.
19.
DeRosierJ.StalhandskeE.BagianJ. P.NudellT. (2002). Using health care Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: The VA National Center for Patient Safety’s prospective risk analysis system. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 28(5), 248-267.
20.
DugglebyW. (2005). What about focus group interaction data?Qualitative Health Research, 15, 832-840. doi:10.1177/1049732304273916
21.
DunstonR.LeeA.BoudD.BrodieP.ChiarellaM. (2009). Co-production and health system reform—From re-imagining to re-making. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 68, 39-52. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2008.00608.x
22.
Edgman-LevitanS.BradyC. (2013). Partnering with patients, families, and Communities for health: A global imperative (WISH Patient and Family Engagement Report, 2013).
23.
EdgrenL. (1998). Co-production—An approach to cardiac rehabilitation from a service management perspective. Journal of Nursing Management, 6, 77-85. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2834.1998.00054.x
24.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4), 532-550.
25.
EisenhardtK. M.GraebnerM. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Academy of management journal, 50(1), 25-32.
26.
EntwistleT. (2010). Collaboration. In AshworthR.BoyneG.EntwistleT. (Eds.), Public service improvement: Theories and evidence (pp. 162-183). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27.
Epping-JordanJ. E.PruittS. D.BengoaR.WagnerE. H. (2004). Improving the quality of health care for chronic conditions. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 13, 299-305. doi:10.1136/qshc.2004.010744
28.
EwertB.EversA. (2014). An ambiguous concept: On the meanings of co-production for health care users and user organizations?Voluntas, 25, 425-442. doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9345-2
29.
GashT.RandallJ.SimsS. (2014). Achieving political decentralisation (Lessons from 30 years of attempting to devolve political power in the UK). London, England: Institute for Government.
30.
GilardiS.GuglielmettiC.CasatiS.MontiP. (2014). Promuovere l’engagement dei pazienti con malattie croniche: Un percorso di ricerca collaborativa [Promoting engagement in chronic illness patients: A collaborative research pathway]. Psicologia della Salute, 3, 58-79. doi:10.3280/PDS2014-003004
31.
GittellJ. H. (2002). Coordinating mechanisms in care provider groups: Relational coordination as a mediator and input uncertainty as a moderator of performance effects. Management Science, 48, 1408-1426. doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.11.1408.268
32.
GlasgowR. E.FunnellM. M.BonomiM. E.DavisC.BeckhamV.WagnerE. H. (2002). Self-management aspects of the improving chronic illness care breakthrough series: Implementation with diabetes and heart failure teams. Annual Behavioral Medicine, 24, 80-87. doi:10.1207/S15324796ABM2402_04
33.
GreenhalghT. (2009). Chronic illness: Beyond the expert patient. British Medical Journal, 338, 629-631.
34.
GrumanJ.RovnerM. H.FrenchM. E.JeffressD.SofaerS.ShallerD.PragerD. J. (2010). From patient education to patient engagement: Implications for the field of patient education. Patient Education & Counseling, 78, 350-356. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.02.002
35.
GuglielmettiC.GilardiS.CasatiS.MontiP. (2012). Divenire partner del team di cura: Qualità del servizio e senso di appartenenza negli adulti con Beta Talassemia major [Partnering with the health care team: Quality of service and sense of belonging in adults with Beta Thalassemia major]. Psicologia della Salute, 1, 87-109.
36.
HarrisM. F.WilliamsA. M.DenniS. M.ZwarN. A.Powel DaviesG. (2008). Chronic disease self-management: Implementation with and within Australian general practice. Medical Journal of Australia, 189, S17-S20.
37.
HeronJ.ReasonP. (2001). The practice of co-operative inquiry: Research with rather than on people. In ReasonP.BradburyH. (Eds.), Handbook of Action research: Participative Inquiry (pp. 179-188). London, England: Sage.
38.
JosP. H. (2014). Advancing Social Equity: Proceduralism in the New Governance. Administration & Society. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0095399714544942
39.
KautzC. M.GittellJ. H.WeinbergD. B.LusenhopW.WrightJ. (2007). Patients benefits from participating in an integrated delivery system: Impact on coordination of care. Health Care Management Review, 32, 284-294. doi:10.1097/01.HMR.0000281629.30149.b1
40.
KirkpatrickI.BullingerB.LegaF.DentM. (2013). The translation of hospital management models in European health systems: A framework for comparison. British Journal of Management, 24, S48-S61. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12030
41.
LegaF.CalciolariS. (2012). Coevolution of patients and hospitals: How changing epidemiology and technological advances create challenges and drive organizational innovation. Journal of Healthcare Management, 57(1), 17-33.
42.
LegaF.MarsilioM.VillaS. (2013). An evaluation framework for measuring supply chain performance in the public healthcare sector: Evidence from the Italian NHS. Production Planning & Control, 24, 931-947.
43.
LöfflerE. (2009). Why co-production is an important topic for local government. Governance International. Retrieved from http://www.govint.org/english/
44.
LorigK. R.RitterP.StewartA. L.SobelD. S.BrownB. W.Jr.BanduraA.. . . HolmanH. R. (2001). Chronic disease self-management program: 2-year health status and health care utilization outcomes. Medical Care, 39, 1217-1223. doi:10.1097/00005650-200111000-00008
45.
MarsilioM. (2013). Public procurement cost containment: The role of cooperative purchasing. In MaggiD.VendraminiE. (Eds.), Financial management and budgeting in public sector: Theories and practice (pp. 63-88). London, UK: McGraw-Hill Education.
46.
MeijerA. (2012). Co-production in an information age: Individual and community engagement supported by new media. Voluntas, 23, 1156-1172. doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9311-z
47.
NeedhamC.CarrS. (2009). Co-production: An emerging evidence base for adult social care transformation. Policing, 8(11), 1-18.
48.
NorrisS. L.LauJ.SmithS. J.SchmidC. H.EngelgauM. M. (2002). Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control. Diabetes Care, 25, 1159-1171. doi:10.2337/diacare.25.7.1159
49.
OsborneS. P. (Ed.). (2010). Public governance and public services delivery: A research agenda for the future. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
50.
Osborne, S. P.RadnorZ.NasiG. (2013). A new theory for public service management? Toward a (public) service-dominant approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 43, 135-158. doi:10.1177/0275074012466935
51.
PollittC. (2012). New perspectives on public services: Place and technology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
52.
RealpeA.WallaceL. A. (2010). What is co-production?London, England: The Health Foundation.
53.
RogersA.KennedyA.BowerP.GardnerC.GatelyC.LeeV.. . . RichardsonG. (2008). The United Kingdom Expert Patients Programme: Results and implications from a national evaluation. Medical Journal of Australia, 189(10), S21-S24.
54.
RummeryK. (2009). Healthy partnerships, healthy citizens? An international review of partnerships in health and social care and patient/user outcomes. Social Science & Medicine, 69, 1797-1804. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.004
55.
RyanB. (2012). Co-production: Option or obligation?Australian Journal of Public Administration, 71, 314-324. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2012.00780.x
56.
SchlappaH.ImaniY. (2012). Leadership and structure in the co-production of public services. UH Business School Working Paper, University of Hertfordshire, UK.
57.
SorrentinoM.De MarcoM. (2013). Implementing e-government in hard times: When the past is wildly at variance with the future. Information Polity, 18, 331-342.
58.
ThomasJ. C. (2013). Citizen, customer, partner: Rethinking the place of the public in public management. Public Administration Review, 73, 786-796. doi:10.1111/puar.12109
59.
ThompsonA. G. H. (2007). The meaning of patient involvement and participation in health care consultation: A taxonomy. Social Science & Medicine, 64, 1297-1310. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.11.002
60.
TorenvliedR.AkkermanA.MeierK. J.O’TooleL. J. (2013). The multiple dimensions of managerial networking. The American Review of Public Administration, 43, 251-272. doi:10.1177/0275074012440497
61.
VerschuereB.BrandsenT.PestoffV. (2012). Co-production: The state of the art in research and the future agenda. Voluntas, 23, 1083-1101. doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9307-8
62.
WilsonP. M.KendallS.BrooksF. (2007). The expert patients programme: A paradox of patient empowerment and medical dominance. Health & Social Care in the Community, 15, 426-438. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2007.00701.x
63.
YinR. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
