Agafonow’s article locates the role of social enterprises in devolving value through output maximizing behavior. This short paper embeds Agafonow’s argument in the societal and institutional context by building upon Luhmann’s social systems theory. According to Luhmann, the functional system of the economy exhibits “imperatives” that cause social ills. The institutional form of social enterprises is shown to weaken these imperatives in several ways. One of these ways, discussed by Agafonow, is the substitution of profit maximization by output maximization. Other ways are the substitution of high-powered incentives by low-powered ones as elaborated in the work of Williamson and Hansmann.
AgafonowA. (2014). Value creation, value capture, and value devolution: Where do social enterprises stand?Administration & Society. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0095399714555756
2.
BorzagaC.GaleraG.G. (2012). The concept and practice of social enterprise: Lessons from the Italian experience. International Review of Social Research, 2, 95-112.
3.
HansmannH. B. (1980). The role of nonprofit enterprise. Yale Law Journal, 89, 835-901.
4.
HodgsonG. M. (2013). From pleasure machines to moral communities: An evolutionary economics without Homo Sapiens. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
5.
LuhmannN. (1989). Ecological communication. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
6.
LuhmannN. (1990). Essays on self-reference. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
7.
ValentinovV. (2013a). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability: insights from Boulding and Luhmann. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 20, 317-324. doi: 10.1080/13504509.2013.808282
8.
ValentinovV. (2013b). Veblen and instrumental value: a systems theory perspective. Journal of Economic Issues, 47, 673-688. doi: 10.2753/JEI0021-3624470304
9.
ValentinovV. (2014a). The complexity-sustainability trade-off in Niklas Luhmann’s social systems theory. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 31, 14-22. doi:10.1002/sres.2146
10.
ValentinovV. (2014b). K. William Kapp’s theory of social costs: A Luhmannian interpretation. Ecological Economics, 97, 28-33. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.10.014
11.
ValentinovV. (2015a). From equilibrium to autopoiesis: a Luhmannian reading of Veblenian evolutionary economics. Economic Systems, 39, 143–155. doi:10.1016/j.ecosys.2014.10.004
12.
ValentinovV. (2015b). Kenneth Boulding’s theories of evolutionary economics and organizational change: a reconstruction. Journal of Economic Issues, 49, 71-88. doi: 10.1080/00213624.2015.1013880
13.
ValentinovV.ChatalovaL. (2014): Institutional economics and social dilemmas: a systems theory perspective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1002/sres.2327
14.
ValentinovV.HielscherS.PiesI. (2015). Nonprofit organizations, institutional economics, and systems thinking. Economic Systems. Advance online publication. doi:10.1016/j.ecosys.2014.12.002
15.
WilliamsonO. E. (1996). The mechanisms of governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
16.
WilliamsonO. E. (2010). Transaction cost economics: The natural progression. American Economic Review, 100, 673-690. doi:10.1257/aer.100.3.673
17.
YunusM. (2010). Building social business: The new kind of capitalism that serves humanity’s most pressing needs. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
