The article examines international development assistance—aid. Donors assert that experts possess predictive knowledge and project belief in such knowledge into organizational form—the Logical Framework Approach. While such beliefs lack predictive power, as aid operates under multiple sovereignty conditions, no single authority determines truth. Donors ease pressure on experts by accepting variation in intervention logics, yet assert the validity of “single truth” knowledge; knowledge production practices have not basically changed. Belief that what is believed is true, revealed in aid work, illuminates the nature of policy in rich countries and helps explain low confidence in government.
De JongS. (2011). False binaries: Altruism and selfishness in NGO work. In FechterA.-M.HindmanH. (Eds.), Inside the everyday lives of development workers: The challenges and futures of Aidland (pp. 21-41). Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press.
7.
DunnJ. (2000). The cunning of unreason: Making sense of politics. New York, NY: Basic Books.
8.
FechterA.-M.HindmanH. (2011). Inside the everyday lives of development workers: The challenges and futures of Aidland. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press.
9.
FergusonJ. (1990). The anti-politics machine: “Development,” depoliticization and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.
FergusonJ. (1997). Development and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. In RahnemaM.BawtreeV. (Eds.), The post-development reader (pp. 223-233). London, England: Zed Books.
11.
FfordeA. (2005). Persuasion: Reflections on economics, data and the “homogeneity assumption.”Journal of Economic Methodology, 12, 63-91.
12.
FfordeA. (2009). Coping with facts—A skeptic’s guide to the problem of development. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press.
13.
FfordeA. (2010). Responses to the policy science problem: Reflections on the politics of development. Development in Practice, 20, 188-204.
14.
FfordeA. (2013). Understanding development economics: Its challenge to development studies. London, England: Routledge.
15.
FfordeA. (in press). Reinventing development: Managing diversity and complexity. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press.
16.
FfordeA.SeidelK. (2015). Cambodia—Donor playground? Defeat and doctrinal dysfunction in a hoped-for client state. South East Asian Research, 23(1), 79-99.
17.
FriedmanJ. (2006). Democratic competence in normative and positive theory: Neglected implications of “The nature of belief systems in mass publics.”Critical Review, 18(1-3), 1-43.
18.
GillespieM. A. (2008). The theological origins of modernity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
GundlachE. (1999). The impact of human capital on economic development: Problems and perspectives. In TanJ. L. H. (Ed.), Human capital formation as an engine of growth (pp. 7-33). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
21.
HageboeckM. (2009). Trends in international development evaluation theory, policy and practices. Washington, DC: United States Agency for International Development.
22.
HinsleyF. (1986). Sovereignty (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
KennyC.WilliamsD. (2001). What do we know about economic growth? Or, why don’t we know very much?World Development, 29(1), 1-22.
29.
KharasH.RogersonA. (2012). Horizon 2025: Creative destruction in the aid industry. London, England: Overseas Development Institute (ODI).
30.
LakatosI. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In LakatosI.MusgraveA. (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
LevineR.ReneltD. (1992). A sensitivity analysis of cross-country growth regressions. American Economic Review, 82, 942-963.
32.
LevineR.ZervosS. J. (1993). What have we learnt about policy and growth from cross-country regressions?The American Economic Review, 83, 426-430.
33.
LindauerD. L.PritchettL. (2002). What’s the big idea? The third generation of policies for economic growth. Economia, 3, 1(Fall), 1-39.
34.
MolundS.SchillG. (2004). Looking backward, moving forward. Stockholm, Sweden: Sida. Available from www.sida.se
35.
MosseD. (2005). Cultivating development: An ethnography of aid policy and practice. London, England: Pluto Press.
36.
NelsenJ.T. (1987) Auftragstaktik: A case for decentralised battle, Parameters, September, 21-34.
37.
NisbetR. A. (1969). Social change and history: Aspects of the Western theory of development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
38.
NorlundI.CaT. N.TuyenN. D. (2003). Dealing with the donors: The politics of Vietnam’s comprehensive poverty reduction and growth strategy (Policy Papers 4/2003). Institute of Development Studies, University of Helsinki.
OlasanB. (2012). Cross-country growth empirics and model uncertainty: An overview. Economics, 6, 2012-2016.
41.
PrasadE.RogoffK. (2003, September1). The emerging truth of going global. Financial Times , p. 21.
42.
PressmanJ. L.WildavskyA. (1973). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland; or, Why it’s amazing that Federal programs work at all, this being a saga of the Economic Development Administration as told by two sympathetic observers who seek to build morals on a foundation of ruined hopes. Berkeley: University of California Press.
43.
PritchettL.WoolcockM.AndrewsM. (2011). Capability traps: Techniques of persistent development failure (Background paper, The 2011 World Development Report on Development, Conflict and Fragile States). Washington, DC: World Bank.
44.
ProctorR.SchiebingerL. (Eds.). (2008). Agnotology: The making and unmaking of ignorance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
45.
RahnemaM.BawtreeV. (1997). The post-development reader. London, England: Zed Books.
46.
RistG. (2008). The history of development—From Western origins to global faith (3rd ed.). London, England: Zed Books.
47.
RottenburgR. (2009). Far-fetched facts: A parable of development aid. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48.
ShoreC.WrightS. (1997). Policy: A new field of anthropology. In ShoreC.WrightS. (Eds.), Anthropology of policy: Critical perspectives on governance and power. London, England: Routledge.
49.
SloanG. (2012). Military doctrine, command philosophy and the generation of fighting power: Genesis and theory. International Affairs, 88, 243-263.
50.
SpruytH. (1994). The sovereign state and its competitors: An analysis of systems change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
VardiG. (2008). The enigma of German Operational Theory: The evolution of military thought in Germany, 1919-1938 (Doctoral dissertation). The London School of Economics and Political Science, London, England.
WidderW. (2002). Auftragstaktik and innere fuehrung: Trademarks of German leadership. Military Review, 82(5), 3-9.
56.
WillisK. (2005). Theories and practices of development. London, England: Routledge.
57.
ZieglerJ. A.DeGroskyM. T. (2008). Managing the meaning of leadership: Leadership as “Communicating Intent” in Wild 4 271-land Firefighting. Leadership, 4, 271-297.
