This study analyzes whether there are any differences in enrollment and drop-out rates between e-participation and traditional participation in a long-term citizen collaboration project. The theoretical framework is based on networked individualism. Results show that capturing and maintaining citizen interest is a daunting task, even in a sensitive topic that might generate positive and tangible benefits for citizens. The higher levels of accessibility offered by information and communication technologies (ICTs) are not enough to reverse public apathy, and person-to-person contact is more effective to maintain engagement. Based on the findings, some actions to reduce dropout in long-term citizen collaboration projects are suggested.
AndersenH. T.van KempenR. (2003). New trends in urban policies in Europe: Evidence from the Netherlands and Denmark. Cities, 20, 77-86. doi:10.1016/S0264-2751(02)00116-6
2.
BertotJ. C.JaegerP. T.HansenD. (2012). The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 30-40. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.004
3.
BloomfieldD.CollinsK.FryC.MuntonR. (2001). Deliberation and inclusion: Vehicles for increasing trust in UK public governance?Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 19, 501-513. doi:10.1068/c6s
4.
BonsónE.TorresL.RoyoS.FloresF. (2012). Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 123-132.
5.
BrainardL. A.McNuttJ. G. (2010). Virtual government–citizen relations: Informational, transactional, or collaborative?Administration & Society, 42, 836-858. doi:10.1177/0095399710386308
6.
BučekJ.SmithB. (2000). New approaches to local democracy: Direct democracy, participation and the “third sector.”Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 18(1), 3-17.
7.
CastellsM. (2001). The internet galaxy: Reflections on the internet, business, and society. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
8.
CastellsM. (2010). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
9.
CooperT. L.BryerT. A.MeekJ. W. (2006). Citizen-centered collaborative public management. Public Administration Review, 66, 76-88.
10.
CourseyD.NorrisD. F. (2008). Models of e-government: Are they correct? An empirical assessment. Public Administration Review, 68, 523-536. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00888.x
11.
CullenR.SommerL. (2011). Participatory democracy and the value of online community networks: An exploration of online and offline communities engaged in civil society and political activity. Government Information Quarterly, 28, 148-154. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.04.008
12.
DutilP. A.HowardC.LangfordJ.RoyJ. (2007). Rethinking government public relationships in a digital world: Customers, clients, or citizens?Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 4(1), 77-90.
13.
FarazmandA. (2012). The future of public administration: Challenges and opportunities—A critical perspective. Administration & Society, 44, 487-517. doi:10.1177/0095399712452658
14.
FontJ.NavarroC. (2013). Personal experience and the evaluation of participatory instruments in Spanish cities. Public Administration, 91, 616-631. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02106.x
15.
FungA. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66, 66-75.
16.
Gil de ZúñigaH.ValenzuelaS. (2011). The mediating path to a stronger citizenship: Online and offline networks, weak ties, and civic engagement. Communication Research, 38, 397-421. doi:10.1177/0093650210384984
17.
Gonzalez SalcedoA. (2011). Los desafíos de la participación ciudadana local. Un estudio comparado entre las ciudades de Madrid y Helsinki. Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia, 49, 1-21.
18.
HockS.AndersonS.PotoskiM. (2013). Invitation phone calls increase attendance at civic meetings: Evidence from a field experiment. Public Administration Review, 73, 221-228. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02627.x
19.
JakobsenM. (2013). Can government initiatives increase citizen coproduction? Results of a randomized field experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23, 27-54. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus036
20.
JosephR. C. (2012). E-government meets social media: Realities and risks. IT Professional, 14(6), 9-15.
21.
KingJ. (2006). Democracy in the information age. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 65(2), 16-32. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2006.00479.x
22.
KlijnE.-H. (2008). Governance and governance networks in Europe. Public Management Review, 10, 505-525.
23.
MarschallM. J. (2004). Citizen participation and the neighborhood context: A new look at the coproduction of local public goods. Political Research Quarterly, 57, 231-244. doi:10.1177/106591290405700205
24.
MatzatU. (2010). Reducing problems of sociability in online communities: Integrating online communication with offline interaction. American Behavioral Scientist, 53, 1170-1193. doi:10.1177/0002764209356249
25.
MulganG. (2005). Reshaping the state and its relationship with citizens: The short, medium and long-term potential of ICTs. In CastellsM.CardosoG. (Eds.), The network society. From knowledge to policy (pp. 225-238). Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins Center for Transatlantic Relations.
26.
MussoJ.WeareC.HaleM. (2000). Designing web technologies for local governance reform: Good management or good democracy?Political Communication, 17, 1-19.
27.
NorrisD. F.ReddickC. G. (2013). Local e-government in the United States: Transformation or incremental change?Public Administration Review, 73, 165-175. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02647.x
28.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2001). Citizens as partners. Information, consultation and public participation in policy-making. Paris, France: Author.
29.
PolsonE. C.KimY.-I.JangS. J.JohnsonB. R.SmithB. (2013). Being prepared and staying connected: Scouting’s influence on social capital and community involvement. Social Science Quarterly, 94, 758-776. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12002
30.
RainieL.WellmanB. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
31.
SæbøØ.RoseJ.FlakL. S. (2008). The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly, 25, 400-428. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2007.04.007
32.
SchellongA.GirrgerP. (2010). Government 2.0 in betaphase a analysis of eParticipation and Web 2.0 applications of Germany’s 50 largest cities and 16 federal states. Wiesbaden, Germany: CSC.
33.
SmithP. D.McDonoughM. H. (2001). Beyond public participation: Fairness in natural resource decision making. Society & Natural Resources, 14, 239-249. doi:10.1080/08941920120140
34.
ThomasJ. C.StreibG. (2005). E-democracy, e-commerce, and e-research: Examining the electronic ties between citizens and governments. Administration & Society, 37, 259-280. doi:10.1177/0095399704273212
35.
TorresL.PinaV.AcereteB. (2006). E-governance developments in European Union cities: Reshaping government’s relationship with citizens. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 19, 277-302.
36.
VissersS.HoogheM.StolleD.MatéoV.-A. (2012). The impact of mobilization media on off-line and online participation: Are mobilization effects medium-specific?Social Science Computer Review, 30, 152-169. doi:10.1177/0894439310396485
37.
WangX. H.WartM. W. (2007). When public participation in administration leads to trust: An empirical assessment of managers’ perceptions. Public Administration Review, 67, 265-278.
38.
WarrenA. M.SulaimanA.JaafarN. I. (2014). Social media effects on fostering online civic engagement and building citizen trust and trust in institutions. Government Information Quarterly, 31, 291-301. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.11.007
39.
WellmanB. (2002). Little boxes, glocalization, and networked individualism. In TanabeM.BesselaarP.IshidaT. (Eds.), Digital cities II: Computational and sociological approaches (Vol. 2362, pp. 10-25). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
40.
WellmanB.BoaseJ.ChenW. (2002). The networked nature of community: Online and offline. IT & Society, 1(1), 151-165.
41.
WellmanB.Quan-HaaseA.BoaseJ.ChenW.HamptonK.DíazI.MiyataK. (2003). The social affordances of the internet for networked individualism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(3), 0. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2003.tb00216.x
42.
YangK. F. (2005). Public administrators’ trust in citizens: A missing link in citizen involvement efforts. Public Administration Review, 65, 273-285.
43.
YangK. F.CallahanK. (2007). Citizen involvement efforts and bureaucratic responsiveness: Participatory values, stakeholder pressures, and administrative practicality. Public Administration Review, 67, 249-264.
44.
YangK. F.HolzerM. (2006). The performance-trust link: Implications for performance measurement. Public Administration Review, 66, 114-126.
45.
YetanoA.RoyoS.AcereteB. (2010). What is driving the increasing presence of citizen participation initiatives?Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28, 783-802.
