In this study, I investigate the factors contributing to gender-based pay disparity in the federal government. The data from a Merit Principles Survey and from central personnel files are analyzed by the ordinary least squares (OLS) regression method. I show that gender and minority status are significantly and negatively associated with salary. However, the positive relationships between education and organizational tenure and salary are stronger than those between gender and minority status, and salary. This suggests that pay grade, performance, and seniority may now be more important determinants of salary than gender and minority status. Agency function is also shown to have a critical influence on the salary level of employees: redistributive agencies that employ more women in traditionally male-dominated occupational categories, or ranks, tend to pay less than other agencies.
AlkadryM. G.TowerL. E. (2006). Unequal pay: The role of gender. Public Administration Review, 66, 888-898.
2.
BearfieldD. A. (2009). Equity at the intersection: Public administration and the study of gender. Public Administration Review, 69, 383-386.
3.
BeckerG. S. (1985). Human capital, effort, and the sexual division of labor. Journal of Labor Economics, 3, S33-S58.
4.
BlauF. D.KahnL. M. (2000). Gender differences in pay. NBER Working Paper No. 7732, Cambridge, MA, National Bureau of Economic Research.
5.
BlauF. D.KahnL. M. (2007). The gender pay gap. The Economists’ Voice, 4, 1-6.
6.
BolitzerB.GodtlandE. M. (2012). Understanding the gender–pay gap in the federal workforce over the past 20 years. American Review of Public Administration, 42, 730-746.
7.
ChoiS. (2011). Diversity and representation in the U.S. federal government: Analysis of the trends of federal employment. Public Personnel Management, 40, 25-46.
8.
CornwellC.KelloughJ. E. (1994). Women and minorities in federal government agencies: Examining new evidence from panel data. Public Administration Review, 54, 265-269.
9.
D’AgostinoM.LevineH. (2010). The career progression of women in state government agencies. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 25, 22-36.
10.
GuyM. E.NewmanM. A. (2004). Women’s jobs, men’s jobs: Sex segregation and emotional labor. Public Administration Review, 64, 289-298.
11.
HakimC. (1996). Key issues in women’s work: Female heterogeneity and the polarisation of women’s employment. London, UK: Athlone Press.
12.
International Labor Office (2010) Global employment trends. Geneva: International Labor Organization.
13.
KellyR. M. (1991). The gendered economy: Work, careers, and success. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
KerrB.MillerW.ReidM. (2002). Sex-based occupational segregation in U.S. state bureaucracies, 1987-97. Public Administration Review, 62, 412-423.
15.
LewisG. B. (1994). Women, occupations, and federal Agencies: Occupational mix and interagency differences in sexual inequality in federal white-collar employment. Public Administration Review, 54, 271-276.
16.
LewisG. B.NiceD. (1994). Race, sex, and occupational segregation in state and local governments. American Review of Public Administration, 24, 393-410.
17.
LipsH. M. (2013). The gender pay gap: Challenging the rationalizations. Perceived equity, discrimination, and the limits of human capital models. Sex Roles, 68, 169-185.
18.
LipsH. M.LawsonK. (2009). Work values, gender, and expectations about work commitment and pay: Laying the groundwork for the “motherhood penalty”?Sex Roles, 61, 667-676.
LowiT. J. (1981). Incomplete conquest: Governing America (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
21.
LowiT. J. (1985). The state in politics: The relation between policy and administration. In NollR. G. (Ed.), Regulatory policy and the social sciences (pp. 67-97), Berkeley: University of California Press.
22.
ManiB. G. (1997). Gender and the federal senior executive service: Where is the glass ceiling?Public Personnel Management, 26, 545-558.
23.
MeierK. J. (1993). Politics and the bureaucracy. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
MillerW.KerrB.ReidM. (1999). A national study of gender-based occupational segregation in municipal bureaucracies: Persistence of glass walls?Public Administration Review, 59, 218-230.
26.
NewmanM. A. (1994). Gender and Lowi’s thesis: Implications for career advancement. Public Administration Review, 54, 277-284.
27.
OlsonJ. E. (2013). Human capital models and the gender pay gap. Sex Roles, 68, 186-197.
28.
PfeffermannD. (1993). The role of sampling weights when modeling survey data. International Statistical Review, 61, 317-337.
29.
PurcellK. (2002). Qualifications and careers: Equal opportunities and earnings among graduates (Working Paper Series No. 1). Manchester, UK: Equal Opportunities Commission.
30.
RiccucciN. (2002). Managing diversity in public sector workforces. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
31.
RiccucciN. (2009). The pursuit of social equity in the federal government: A road less traveled?Public Administration Review, 69, 373-382.
32.
RipleyR. B.FranklinG. A. (1991). Congress, the bureaucracy, and public policy. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
33.
SneedB. G. (2007). Glass walls in state bureaucracies: Examining the difference departmental function can make. Public Administration Review, 67, 880-891.
34.
SolbergE. J. (2004). Occupational assignment, hiring discrimination, and the gender pay gap. Atlantic Economic Journal, 32, 11-27.
35.
StiversC. (2002). Gender images in public administration: Legitimacy and the administrative state. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
StiversC. (2005). Dreaming the world: Feminisms in public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 27, 364-369.
37.
StockdaleM. S.NadlerJ. T. (2013). Paradigmatic assumptions of disciplinary research on gender disparities: The case of occupational sex segregation. Sex Roles, 68, 207-215.
38.
TharenouP. (2013). The work of feminists is no yet done: The gender pay gap—A stubborn anachronism. Sex Roles, 68, 198-206.
39.
ThomsonV. (2006). How much of the remaining gender pay gap is the result of discrimination, and how much is due to individual choices?The International Journal of Urban Labour and Leisure, 7(2), 1-32.
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2004). Glass ceilings: The status of women as officials and managers in the private sector. Washington, DC: Author.
U.S. Governmental Accountability Office. (2009). Women’s pay: Gender pay gap in the federal workforce narrows as differences in occupation, education, and experience diminish (Congressional report). Washington, DC: Author.
