Local government structural reform programs are often based on the purported benefits of increased scale. We examine this question in relation to the proposed amalgamation program for New South Wales (NSW) by the NSW Independent Local Government Review Panel using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). We find evidence that a significant proportion of municipalities scheduled for amalgamation already exceed optimal scale and that the great majority of “amalgamated” entities will initially exhibit decreasing returns to scale. Our findings thus stand in stark contrast to the Independent Local Government Review Panel (ILGRP) contention that municipal mergers are the optimal approach to capturing economies of scale in NSW local government.
Australian Accounting Standards Board. (2010). AASB 116 property, plant and equipment. Melbourne: Author.
2.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2013). National regional profile (2007-2011). Canberra: Australian Government.
3.
Australian Centre For Excellence in Local Government. (2011). Consolidation in Local Government: A Fresh Look. Sydney: ACELG.
4.
Balaguer-CollM. T.PriorD. (2009). Short and long-term evaluation of efficiency and quality: An application to Spanish municipalities. Applied Economics, 41, 2991-3002.
5.
ByrnesJ.DolleryB. (2002). Do economies of scale exist in Australian local government? A review of the research evidence. Urban Policy and Research, 20, 391-414.
6.
CoelliT.RaoP.O’DonnellC.BatteseG. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. New York, NY: Springer.
7.
Da CruzN.MarquesR. (2014). Revisiting the determinants of local government performance. Omega, 44, 91-103.
8.
DolleryB.CraseL.JohnsonA. (2006). Australian local government economics. Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales Press.
9.
DolleryB.GrantB. (2009). Tortoises and hares: The race to shared services across Australian state and territory jurisdictions. International Journal of Public Administration, 33, 43-54.
10.
DolleryB.GrantB.KorttM. A. (2012). Councils in cooperation: Shared services in Australian local government. Sydney, Australia: Federation Press.
11.
DrewJ.DolleryB. (2014a). Estimating the impact of the proposed greater Sydney metropolitan amalgamations on municipal financial sustainability. Public Money & Management, 34(4), 281-288.
12.
DrewJ.DolleryB. (2014b). Keeping it in-house: Households as an alternative proxy for local government output. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 73, 235-246.
13.
DrewJ.DolleryB. (2014c). Separation anxiety: An empirical evaluation of the sunshine coast regional council de-amalgamation. Public Money & Management, 34, 213-220.
14.
DrewJ.DolleryB. (2015). Inconsistent depreciation practice and public policymaking: Local government reform in New South Wales. Australian Accounting Review, 25(1), 28-37.
15.
FergusonC. E. (1969). The neoclassical theory of production and distribution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
FogartyJ.MugeraA. (2013). Local government efficiency: Evidence from Western Australia. The Australian Economic Review, 46, 300-311.
17.
HoodC. (1998). The art of the state. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
18.
Independent Local Government Review Panel. (2013). Revitalising local government. Sydney, Australia: Author.
19.
JiY.LeeC. (2010). Data envelopment analysis. The Stata Journal, 10, 267-280.
20.
JohnsenA. (2005). What does 25 years of experience tell us about the state of performance measurement in public policy and management?Public Money & Management, 25, 9-17.
21.
New South Wales Parliament. (1993). Local Government Act, NSW. Sydney, Australia: Author.
22.
NormanR. (2002). Managing through measurement or meaning? Lessons from experience with New Zealand’s public sector performance management systems. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 68, 619-628.
23.
PilcherR. (2002). Reporting of roads by NSW local councils-survival of the fittest, accounting. Accountability & Performance, 8(2), 23-41.
24.
PilcherR. (2005). Local government financial key performance indicators—not so relevant, reliable, and accountable. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 54, 451-467.
25.
PilcherR. (2006). The smoothing potential of depreciation for local authorities. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 12(2), 67-80.
26.
PilcherR.Van Der ZahnM. (2010). Local governments unexpected depreciation and financial performance adjustment. Financial Accountability & Management, 26, 299-323.
27.
Treasury Corporation. (2013). Financial sustainability of the New South Wales local government sector. Sydney, Australia: Author.
28.
WorthingtonA. C. (2000). Cost efficiency in Australian local government: A comparative analysis of mathematical programming and econometric approaches. Financial Accountability & Management, 16, 201-223.
29.
WorthingtonA. C.DolleryB. E. (2001). Measuring efficiency in local governments: An analysis of New South Wales municipalities’ domestic waste management function. Policy Studies Journal, 29, 232-249.
