This article highlights the importance of ethical environment in enhancing organizational performance. It is vital that organizations set ethical standards for their employees alongside providing an environment that fosters trust and commitment, provides leadership, and creates a high quality of workforce to improve organizational performance. To study the impact of ethical environment on organizational performance, we employ elements from André de Waal’s high-performance organization (HPO) framework. Data for this study come from a national survey conducted in four states in the United States, which are classified as at-will employment states: Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Florida. We find evidence that ethical environment plays an important role in determining organizational performance. This is particularly important in the context of at-will employment, where state governments are facing the challenge to maintain employee commitment while improving organizational performance.
AmirkhanyanA. A.KimH. J.LambrightK. T. (2014). The performance puzzle: Understanding the factors influencing alternative dimensions and views of performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24, 1-34.
2.
AndrewsR.BoyneG. (2010). Capacity, leadership, and organizational performance: Testing the black box model of public management. Public Administration Review, 70, 443-454.
3.
AndrewsR.BoyneG.EnticottG. (2006). Performance failure in the public sector: Misfortune or mismanagement?Public Management Review, 8, 273-296.
4.
AndrewsR.BoyneG.LawJ.WalkerR. (2005). External constraints on local service standards: The case of comprehensive performance assessment in English local government. Public Administration, 83, 639-656.
5.
AndrewsR.BoyneG.WalkerR. (2006). Strategy content and organizational performance: An empirical analysis. Public Administration Review, 66, 52-63.
6.
AvolioB. J. (2007). Promoting more integrative strategies for leadership theory-building. American Psychologist, 62, 25-33.
7.
AvolioB. J.ZhuW.KohW.BhatiaP. (2004). Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: Mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 951-968.
8.
BartosS. (2003). Creating and sustaining innovation. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 62(1), 09-14.
9.
BassB. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: Free Press.
10.
BassB. M.AvolioB. J. (Eds.). (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
11.
BassB. M.AvolioB. J.JungD. I.BersonY. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 207-218.
12.
BattaglioR. P. (2010). Public service reform and motivation: Evidence from an employment at-will environment. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 30, 341-363.
13.
BermanE. M. (2006). Performance and productivity in public and nonprofit organizations. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.
14.
BermanE. M. (2013). Human Resource Management in the Asia-Pacific Region: Symposium Introduction. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 33(2), 115-120.
15.
BermanE. M.WestJ. P. (1997). Managing ethics to improve performance and build trust. Public Integrity Annual, 2(1), 21-29.
16.
BermanE. M.WestJ. P. (1998). Productivity enhancement efforts in public and nonprofit organizations. Public Productivity & Management Review, 22, 207-219.
17.
BoernerS.EisenbeissS.GriesserD. (2007). Follower behavior and organizational performance: The impact of transformational leaders. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13(3), 15-26.
18.
BohteJ.MeierK. (2000). Goal displacement: Assessing the motivation for organizational cheating. Public Administration Review, 60, 173-182.
19.
BowmanJ. B.WilliamsR. L. (1997). Ethics in government: From a winter of despair to a spring of hope. Public Administration Review, 57, 517-526.
20.
BowmanJ. S. (1990). Ethics in government: A national survey of public administrators. Public Administration Review, 50, 345-353.
21.
BowmanJ. S.GertzM.GertzS.WilliamsR. (2003). Civil service reform in Florida State government employee attitudes 1 year later. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 23, 286-304.
22.
BowmanJ. S.KnoxC. C. (2008). Ethics in government: No matter how long and dark the night. Public Administration Review, 68, 627-639.
23.
BowmanJ. S.WestJ. P. (2006). Ending civil service protections in Florida government experiences in state agencies. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 26, 139-157.
24.
BowmanJ. S.WestJ. P. (2009). To “Re-Hatch” public employees or not? An ethical analysis of the relaxation of restrictions on political activities in civil service. Public Administration Review, 69, 52-63.
25.
BoyneG. A. (2003). Sources of public service improvement: A critical review and research agenda. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13, 367-394.
26.
BoyneG. A.MeierK.O’TooleL.WalkerR. (2005). Where next? Research directions on performance in public organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 633-639.
27.
BreulJ. D.KamenskyJ. M. (2008). Federal government reform: Lessons from Clinton’s “reinventing government” and Bush’s “management agenda” initiatives. Public Administration Review, 68, 1009-1026.
28.
BrewerG. A. (1998). In the eye of the storm: Frontline supervisors and federal agency performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 505-527.
29.
BrewerG. A. (2005). In the eye of the storm: Frontline supervisors and federal agency performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(4), 505-527.
30.
BrewerG. A. (2006). All measures of performance are subjective: More evidence on US federal agencies. In BoyneG. A.MeierK. J.O’TooleL. J.WalkerR. M. (Eds.), Public service performance: Perspectives on measurement and management (pp. 35-54). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
BrewerG. A.SeldenS. C. (1998). Whistle blowers in the federal civil service: New evidence of the public service ethic. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8, 413-440.
32.
BrewerG. A.SeldenS. C. (2000). Why elephants gallop: Assessing and predicting organizational performance in federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 685-712.
33.
BruceW. (1994). Ethical people are productive people. Public Productivity & Management Review, 17, 241-252.
34.
BruceW. (1996). Codes of ethics and codes of conduct: Perceived contribution to the practice of ethics in local government. Public Integrity Annual, 17, 23-30.
35.
BrumbackG. B. (1998). Institutionalizing ethics in government. In BermanE.WestJ.BonczekS. (Eds.), The ethics edge (pp. 61-71). Washington, DC: International City and County Management Association.
BurnsT.StalkerG. M. (1961). The management of innovation. London, England: Tavistock.
38.
CaillierJ. G. (2010). Factors affecting job performance in public agencies. Public Performance & Management Review, 34, 139-165.
39.
ChoiS.RaineyH. G. (2010). Managing diversity in US federal agencies: Effects of diversity and diversity management on employee perceptions of organizational performance. Public Administration Review, 70, 109-121.
40.
ChunY.RaineyH. G. (2005). Goal ambiguity and organizational performance in US federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 529-557.
41.
CondreyS.BattaglioP. (2007). A return to spoils? Revisiting radical civil service reform in the United States. Public Administration Review, 67, 425-436.
42.
CooperT. L. (1992). Exemplary public administrators: Character and leadership in government. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
43.
CooperT. L. (2001). The emergence of administrative ethics as a field of study in the United States. In CooperT. L. (Ed.), Handbook of administrative ethics (pp. 1-36). New York, NY: CRC Press.
44.
CooperT. L. (2004). Big questions in administrative ethics: A need for focused, collaborative effort. Public Administration Review, 64, 395-407.
45.
DamanpourF.WalkerR.AvellanedaC. (2009). Combinative effects of innovation types and organizational performance: A longitudinal study of service organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 650-675.
46.
DamanpourF.WischnevskyD. (2006). Research on innovation in organizations: Distinguishing innovation-generating from innovation-adopting organizations. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 23, 269-291.
47.
DelaneyJ. T.HuselidM. (1996). The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 949-969.
48.
DenhardtK. G. (1988). Ethics of public service: Resolving moral dilemmas in public organizations. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
49.
de WaalA. A. (2010). Achieving high performance in the public sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 34(1), 81-103.
50.
DobelJ. P. (1990). Integrity in the public service. Public Administration Review, 50, 354-366.
51.
FernandezS.ChoY. J.PerryJ. L. (2010). Exploring the link between integrated leadership and public sector performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 308-323.
52.
FredericksonH. G. (Ed.). (1993). Ethics and public administration. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.
53.
FredericksonH. G. (1997). The spirit of public administration. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
54.
FredericksonH. G. (1999). Ethics and the new managerialism. Public Administration & Management: An Interactive Journal, 4, 299-324.
55.
FredericksonH. G.NewmanM. A. (2001). The patriotism of exit and voice: The case of Gloria Flora. Public Integrity, 3, 347-362.
56.
GilmanS. C. (2000). An idea whose time has come: The international experience of the US Office of Government Ethics in developing anticorruption systems. Public Integrity, 2, 135-155.
57.
GoodmanD.FrenchE. (2011). Assessing the temporary use of at-will employment for reorganization and workforce reduction in Mississippi state government. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 31, 270-290.
58.
GoreA. (1993). From red tape to results: Creating a government that works better and costs less: Report of the national performance review. Collingdale, PA: Diane.
59.
GossR. P. (1996). A distinct public administration ethics?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6, 573-597.
60.
GossettC. W. (2003). The changing face of Georgia’s merit system: Results from an employee attitude survey in the Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice. Public Personnel Management, 32, 267-278.
61.
GumusluogluL.IlsevA. (2009). Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation. Journal of Business Research, 62, 461-473.
62.
HainesD. W. (2004). Fatal choices: The routinization of deceit, incompetence, and corruption. Public Integrity, 6(1), 5-23.
63.
HaysS. W.SowaJ. (2006). Changes in state civil service systems: A national survey. In BowmanJ.WestJ. (Eds.), American Public Service: Radical reform and the merit system (pp. 3-23). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
64.
IngrahamP. W. (Ed). (2007). In pursuit of performance: Management systems in state and local government. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
65.
IngrahamP. W.SeldenS. C.MoynihanD. (2000). People and performance: Challenges for the future public service—The report from the Wye River conference. Public Administration Review, 60, 54-60.
66.
IngrahamP. W.SowaJ. E.MoynihanD. (2004). Linking dimensions of public sector leadership to performance. In IngrahamP.LynnL. (Eds). The art of governance: Analyzing management and administration (pp. 152-170). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
67.
KimS. (2005). Individual-level factors and organizational performance in government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 245-261.
68.
KimS. E.LeeJ. W.KimB. S. (2007, October). The quality of management and government innovation: An empirical study. Paper presented at 9th Public Management Research Conference, University of Arizona, Tucson.
69.
LawlerE. E. (2003). Treat people right! How organizations and individuals can propel each other into a virtuous spiral of success. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
70.
MacaulayM.LawtonA. (2006). From virtue to competence: Changing the principles of public service. Public Administration Review, 66, 702-710.
71.
MeierK.O’TooleL. (2002). Public management and organizational performance: The effect of managerial quality. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21, 629-643.
72.
MeierK.O’TooleL. (2013). Subjective organizational performance and measurement error: Common source bias and spurious relationships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23, 429-456.
73.
MeierK.O’TooleL.BoyneG.WalkerR. (2007). Strategic management and the performance of public organizations: Testing venerable ideas against recent theories. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 357-377.
74.
MenzelD. C. (1993). The ethics factor in local government: An empirical analysis. In FredericksonG. (Ed.), Ethics and public administration (pp. 191-204). Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.
75.
MenzelD. C. (1996). Ethics stress in public organizations. Public Productivity & Management Review, 20(1), 70-83.
76.
MenzelD. C. (1997). Teaching ethics and values in public administration: Are we making a difference?Public Administration Review, 30, 224-230.
77.
MenzelD. C. (2005). Research on ethics and integrity in governance: A review and assessment. Public Integrity, 7, 147-168.
78.
MenzelD. C. (2007). Ethics Management for Public Administrators: Building Organizations of Integrity. New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
79.
MenzelD. C.CarsonK. (1999). A review and assessment of empirical research on public administration ethics: Implications for scholars and managers. Public Integrity, 1, 239-264.
80.
MoserM. R. (1988). Ethical conflict at work: A critique of the literature and recommendations for future research. Journal of Business Ethics, 7, 381-387.
81.
MoynihanD.IngrahamP. W. (2004). Integrative leadership in the public sector: A model of performance-information use.”Administration & Society, 36, 427-453.
82.
MoynihanD. P.PandeyS. K. (2005). Testing how management matters in an era of government by performance management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(3), 421-439.
83.
MoynihanD.PandeyS. (2010). The big question for performance management: Why do managers use performance information?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, 849-866.
84.
NaffK. C.CrumJ. (1999). Working for America: Does public service motivation make a difference?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 19(5), 5-16.
85.
NewellT.ReeherG.RonayneR. (Eds). (2011). The trusted leader: Building the relationships that make government work. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
86.
Nicholson-CrottyS.O’TooleL. (2004). Public management and organizational performance: The case of law enforcement agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, 1-18.
87.
NigroL. G.KelloughJ. E. (2000). Civil service reform in Georgia going to the edge?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 20(4), 41-54.
88.
O’ReillyC.IIIPfefferJ. A. (2000). Hidden value: How great companies achieve extraordinary results with ordinary people. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
89.
OsborneD.GaeblerT. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming government. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
90.
OttJ. S. (1989). The organizational culture perspective. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
91.
PerryJ. L. (1993). Whistle blowing, organizational performance, and organizational control. In FredericksonG. (Ed.), Ethics and public administration (pp. 79-99). Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.
92.
PetersT.WatermanR. (1982). In search of excellence: Lessons from American’s best-run companies. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
93.
PettyM. M.McGeeG.CavenderJ. (1984). A meta-analysis of the relationships between individual job satisfaction and individual performance. Academy of Management Review, 9, 712-721.
94.
PittsD. (2009). Diversity management, job satisfaction, and performance: Evidence from US federal agencies. Public Administration Review, 69(2), 328-338.
95.
PfefferJ. (1998). The human equation: Building profits by putting people first. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
96.
PfefferJ.VeigaJ. (1999). Putting people first for organizational success. The Academy of Management Executive, 13(2), 37-48.
97.
RaineyH. G.SteinbauerP. (1999). Galloping elephants: Developing elements of a theory of effective government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9, 1-32.
98.
RohrJ. A. (1978). Ethics for bureaucrats: An essay on law and values. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
99.
SalgeT. O.VeraA. (2009). Hospital innovativeness and organizational performance: Evidence from English public acute care. Health Care Management Review, 34, 54-67.
100.
ScheinE. H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
101.
ScheinE. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (Vol. 2). New York, NY: John Wiley.
102.
SeldenS. C.SowaJ. (2004). Testing a multi-dimensional model of organizational performance: Prospects and problems. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, 395-416.
VictorB.CullenJ. (1988). The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 101-125.
105.
WalkerR. M.DamanpourF.DeveceC. A. (2010). Management innovation and organizational performance: The mediating effect of performance management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), 367-386.
106.
WalumbwaF. O.MayerD. M.WangP.WangH.WorkmanK.ChristensenA. L. (2011). Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: The roles of leader–member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 204-213.
107.
WestJ. P.BermanE. (2004). Ethics training in US cities: Content, pedagogy, and impact. Public Integrity, 6, 189-206.
108.
ZajacG.Al-KazemiA. (2000). Administrative ethics and organizational learning in Kuwait and the United States: An empirical approach. International Journal of Public Administration, 23, 21-52.
