This article focuses on the personal dimension of the identity crisis in public administration and its impact on academic research. Devoid of a socially recognizable secure academic identity, practitioner represents the closest to an authentic identity for the public administration researcher. This identification with the practitioner comes at a price and leads to the treatment of “public” as the Other in public administration research. Drawing insights from Said’s treatment of the concept of the Other, various dimensions of the discourses of power and knowledge in public administration which lead to categorization of the public as the Other are discussed.
ArmstrongJ. A. (1982). Nations before nationalism. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
2.
BarnesM.NewmanJ.KnopsA.SullivanH. (2003). Constituting “the public” in public participation. Public Administration, 81, 379-399.
3.
BaumanZ. (1995). Making and unmaking of strangers. Thesis Eleven, 43(1), 1-16.
4.
BehnR. D. (1992). Management and the neutrino: The search for meaningful metaphors. Public Administration Review, 52, 409-419.
5.
BinghamL. B.NabatchiT.O’LearyR. (2005). The new governance: Practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government. Public Administration Review, 65, 547-558.
6.
BrysonJ. M.QuickK. S.SlotterbackC. S.CrosbyB. C. (2013). Designing public participation processes. Public Administration Review, 73, 23-34.
7.
CatlawT. J. (2006). The death of the practitioner. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 28, 190-207.
8.
CatlawT. J. (2007). Fabricating the people: Politics and administration in the biopolitical state. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
9.
CleggS. (2002). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Public Administration Quarterly, 26, 112-117.
10.
CunninghamR.WeschlerL. (2002). Theory and the public administration student/practitioner. Public Administration Review, 62, 104-111.
11.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
12.
DenhardtR. B. (2001). The big questions of public administration education. Public Administration Review, 61, 526-534.
13.
ElíasM. V.AlkadryM. G. (2011). Constructive conflict, participation, and shared governance. Administration & Society, 43, 869-895.
14.
FarmerD. J. (1995). The language of public administration: Bureaucracy, modernity, and postmodernity. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
15.
FarmerD. J. (2003). The allure of rhetoric and the truancy of poetry. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 25, 9-36.
16.
FeldmanM. S.KhademianA. M. (2007). The role of the public manager in inclusion: Creating communities of participation. Governance, 20, 305-324.
17.
FoucaultM. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
18.
FoucaultM.DeleuzeG. (1977). Intellectuals and power. In BouchardD.F. (Ed.), Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected Essays and Interviews. (pp. 205-217). Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press.
19.
FungA. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66(Suppl. 1), 66-75.
20.
GiddensA. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
21.
HerianM. N.HammJ. A.TomkinsA. J.ZilligL. M. P. (2012). Public participation, procedural fairness, and evaluations of local governance: The moderating role of uncertainty. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 815-840.
22.
IrvinR. A.StansburyJ. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort?Public Administration Review, 64, 55-65.
23.
JenkinsR. (1994). Rethinking ethnicity: Identity, categorization and power. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 17, 197-223.
24.
JenkinsR. (1997). Rethinking ethnicity: Arguments and explorations. London, England: Sage.
25.
JohnstonE. (2010). Governance infrastructures in 2020. Public Administration Review, 70(Suppl. 1), s122-s128.
26.
KiplingR. (1899). The white man’s burden: The United States and The Philippine Islands. Mcclure’s Magazine, 12. New York: Doubleday and McClure Co.
27.
MckennaD. (2011). UK local government and public participation: Using conjectures to explain the relationship. Public Administration, 89, 1182-1200.
28.
MoynihanD. P. (2003). Normative and instrumental perspectives on public participation: Citizen summits in Washington, DC. The American Review of Public Administration, 33, 164-188.
29.
MoynihanD. P.IngrahamP. W. (2010). The suspect handmaiden: The evolution of politics and administration in the American state. Public Administration Review, 70, (Suppl. 1), s229-s237.
30.
NabatchiT. (2012). Putting the “public” back in public values research: Designing participation to identify and respond to values. Public Administration Review, 72, 699-708.
31.
NeshkovaM. I. (2014). Does agency autonomy foster public participation?Public Administration Review, 74, 64-74.
32.
NeshkovaM. I.GuoH. D. (2012). Public participation and organizational performance: Evidence from state agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 267-288.
33.
NietzscheF. W. (1976). The portable Nietzsche. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
34.
NyeJ. S.ZelikowP.KingD. C. (Eds.). (1997). Why people don’t trust government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35.
OstromV. (1989). The intellectual crisis in American public administration. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
36.
OvermanE. S. (1996). The new sciences of administration: Chaos and quantum theory. Public Administration Review, 56, 487-491.
37.
RaadscheldersJ. C. (2011). Public administration: The interdisciplinary study of government. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
38.
RaadscheldersJ. C.DouglasJ. W. (2003). The doctoral graduate in public administration: Apprentice or master?Journal of Public Affairs Education, 9, 229-243.
39.
RobbinsM. D.SimonsenB.FeldmanB. (2008). Citizens and resource allocation: Improving decision making with interactive web-based citizen participation. Public Administration Review, 68, 564-575.
40.
RobertsN. (2004). Public deliberation in an age of direct citizen participation. The American Review of Public Administration, 34, 315-353.
41.
RutgersM. R. (1998). Paradigm lost: Crisis as identity of the study of public administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 64, 553-564.
42.
RutgersM. R. (2010). Theory and scope of public administration: An introduction to the study’s epistemology (Foundations of Public Administration Series). Public Administration Review, pp. 1-45.
43.
SaidE. (1979). Orientalism. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
44.
SaidE. (1985). Orientalism reconsidered. Cultural Critique, 1(1), 89-107.
SartreJ.-P. (1956). Being and nothingness: An essay on phenomenological ontology. New York, NY: Philosophical Library.
47.
SimonH. A. (1947). A comment on “the science of public administration.”Public Administration Review, 7, 200-203.
48.
StallingsR. A.FerrisJ. M. (1988). Public administration research: Work in PAR, 1940-1984. Public Administration Review, 48, 580-587.
49.
SwyngedouwE. (2011). Depoliticized environments: The end of nature, climate change and the post-political condition. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 69, 253-274.
WaldoD. (1948). The administrative state: A study of the political theory of American public administration. New York, NY: Ronald Press.
52.
WaldoD. (1968). Scope of the theory of public administration. In CharlesworthJ. C. (Ed.), Theory and practice of public administration: Scope, objectives, and methods (pp. 1-26). Philadelphia, PA: American Academy of Political and Social Science.
53.
WangX.BryerT. A. (2013). Assessing the costs of public participation: A case study of two online participation mechanisms. The American Review of Public Administration, 43, 179-199.
54.
WoodsN. D. (2013). Regulatory democracy reconsidered: The policy impact of public participation requirements. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.
55.
YangK. (2006). Trust and citizen involvement decisions: Trust in citizens, trust in institutions, and propensity to trust. Administration & Society, 38, 573-595.
56.
YangK.CallahanK. (2007). Citizen involvement efforts and bureaucratic responsiveness: Participatory values, stakeholder pressures, and administrative practicality. Public Administration Review, 67, 249-264.
57.
YangK.PandeyS. K. (2011). Further dissecting the black box of citizen participation: When does citizen involvement lead to good outcomes?Public Administration Review, 71, 880-892.
58.
ZembylasM. (2005). Teaching with emotion: A postmodern enactment. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
