Even though the changes in governance arrangements of postcommunist countries have received considerable attention from the observers of the Central and Eastern European (CEE) region, “transition” as the prevailing paradigm for governing postcommunist societies has rarely been questioned. More than 20 years, it has served as the guiding framework for thinking about and practicing postsocialist transformation. By using Estonia as a critical case among the CEE countries, this research employs Foucauldian discourse analysis and deconstructive reading for exploring how public administration has been constituted by governing postcommunist change as “transition” and the limitations of, and the alternatives to, this approach.
ÁghA. (2003). Public administration in Central and Eastern Europe. In PetersB. G.PierreJ. (Eds.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 536-548). London, England: SAGE.
2.
AlvessonM. (2002). Postmodernism and social research. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
3.
AslundA. (2007). How capitalism was built: The transformation of Central and Eastern Europe, Russia, and Central Asia. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BauerM. W.AartsB. (2000). Corpus construction: A principle for qualitative data collection. In BauerM. W.GaskellG. (Eds.), Qualitative researching with text, image and sound (pp. 19-37). London, England: SAGE.
5.
BerdahlD.BunzlM.LamplandM. (Eds.). (2000). Altering states: Ethnographies of transition in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
6.
BergB. L. (2009). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
7.
BrohmanJ. (1995). Universalism, Eurocentrism, and ideological bias in development studies. Third World Quarterly, 16, 121-140.
8.
BuchowskiM. (2001). Rethinking transformation: An anthropological perspective on postsocialism. Poznan, Poland: Wydawictwo Humaniora.
9.
BudryteD. (2011). Transitional regimes. In KurianG. T. (Ed.). The encyclopedia of political science (pp. 1681-1682). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
10.
BurawoyM. (1999). Afterword. In BurawoyM.VerderyK. (Eds.), Uncertain transition: Ethnographies of change in the postsocialist world (pp. 301-311). Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.
11.
BurawoyM.VerderyK. (Eds.). (1999). Uncertain transition: Ethnographies of change in the postsocialist world. Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.
12.
BurrV. (2003). Social constructionism. London, England: Routledge.
13.
CarothersT. (2002). The end of the transition paradigm. Journal of Democracy, 13(1), 5-21.
14.
ChariS.VerderyK. (2009). Thinking between the posts: Postcolonialism, postsocialism, and ethnography after the Cold War. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 51, 6-34.
15.
ChiltonP.IlyinM. V.MeyJ. L. (Eds.). (1998). Political discourse in transition in Europe 1989-1991. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
16.
ChouliarakiL.FaircloughN. (1999). Discourse in late modernity: Rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
17.
ConnorW. D. (2011). Postcommunist transformation. In KurianG. T. (Ed.). The encyclopedia of political science (pp. 1319-1320). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
18.
CreswellJ. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
19.
DauphinéeE. (2003). Faith, hope, neoliberalism: Mapping economies of violence on the margins of Europe. Dialectical Anthropology, 27, 189-203.
DrechslerW. (2005). The re-emergence of “Weberian” public administration after the fall of New Public Management: The Central and Eastern European perspective. Halduskultuur, 6, 94-108.
22.
DryzekJ. S.HolmesL. (2002). Post-communist democratization: Political discourses across thirteen countries. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
DuboisM. (1991). The governance of the Third World: A Foucauldian perspective of power relations in development. Alternatives, 16(1), 1-30.
24.
ElsterJ.OffeC.PreussU. K. (1998). Institutional design in post-communist societies: Rebuilding the ship at sea. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25.
EscobarA. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
FaircloughN. (2005a). Critical discourse analysis in trans-disciplinary research on social change: Transition, re-scaling, poverty and social inclusion. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 1, 37-58.
36.
FaircloughN. (2005b). Discourse in processes of social change: “Transition” in Central and Eastern Europe. British and American Studies, 11, 9-34.
37.
FaircloughN. (2006). Discursive transition in Central and Eastern Europe. In Shi-xu (Ed.), Discourse as cultural struggle (pp. 49-72). Hong Kong, China: Hong Kong University Press.
38.
FergusonJ. (1994). The anti-politics machine: “Development,” depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39.
FlyvbjergB. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 219-245.
40.
FoucaultM. (1985). The use of pleasure. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
41.
GalasińskaA.GalasińskiD. (2010). The post-communist condition: Public and private discourses of transformation. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
42.
GalasińskaA.KrzyzanowskiM. (Eds.). (2009). Discourse and transformation in Central and Eastern Europe. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
43.
GausJ. M. (2010). The ecology of public administration. In StillmanR. J.II (Ed.), Public administration: Concepts and cases (pp. 80-85). Boston, MA: Wadsworth. (Original work published 1947)
44.
GoetzK. H.MargettsH. Z. (1999). The solitary center: The core executive in Central and Eastern Europe. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 12 (4), 425-453.
45.
GoetzK. H.WollmannH. (2001). Governmentalizing central executives in post-communist Europe: A four-country comparison. Journal of European Public Policy, 8 (6), 864-887.
46.
Government Expert Committee on Public Administration Reform. (1999).The principles of public administration development.
47.
GoralczykB. J. (2000). The post-communist world: A conceptual framework. In KosteckiW.ZukrowskaK.GoralczykB. J. (Eds.), Transformations of post-communist states (pp. 281-300). Houndmills, UK: Macmillan Press.
48.
GuessG. M. (1997). Symposium on public sector management in Eastern Europe. International Journal of Public Administration, 20, 557-563.
49.
HannC. M. (Ed.). (2002). Postsocialism: Ideals, ideologies and practices in Eurasia. London, England: Routledge.
50.
HesseJ. J. (1993). From transformation to modernization: Administrative change in Central and Eastern Europe. In HesseJ. J. (Ed.), Administrative transformation in Central and Eastern Europe: Towards public sector reform in post-communist societies (pp. 219-257). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
51.
HesseJ. J. (1997). Rebuilding the state: Public sector reform in Central and Eastern Europe. In LaneJ.-E. (Ed.), Public sector reform: Rationale, trends and problems (pp. 114-146). London, England: SAGE.
52.
HolmesL. (1997). Post-communism: An introduction. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
53.
HowarthD. (2000). Discourse. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
54.
Interview With Academic No. 1, March29, 2012, Estonia.
55.
Interview With Academic No. 2, March12, 2012, Estonia.
56.
Interview With Academic No. 3, March30, 2012, Estonia.
57.
Interview With NGO Leader No. 1, May3, 2012, Estonia.
58.
Interview With NGO Leader No. 2, May18, 2012, Estonia.
59.
Interview With NGO Leader No. 3, May3, 2012, Estonia.
60.
Interview With State Official No. 1, March21, 2012, Estonia.
61.
Interview With State Official No. 2, May22, 2012, Estonia.
62.
Interview With State Official No. 3, April19, 2012, Estonia.
63.
Interview With State Official No. 4, March27, 2012, Estonia.
64.
Interview With State Official No. 5, May8, 2012, Estonia.
65.
JacobsC. (2004). The challenge of public sector reform in EC accession countries: Reflections from the Baltics, especially Latvia. Public Administration and Development, 24, 321-331.
KandiyotiD. (2002). How far do analyses of postsocialism travel? The case of Central Asia. In HannC. M. (Ed.), Postsocialism: Ideals, ideologies, and practices in Eurasia (pp. 238-527). London, England: Routledge.
69.
KendallG.WickhamG. (1999). Using Foucault’s methods. London, England: SAGE.
70.
KennedyM. D. (Ed.). (1994). Envisioning Eastern Europe: Postcommunist cultural studies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
71.
KennedyM. D. (2002). Cultural formations of post-communism: Emancipation, nation, and war. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
72.
KilduffM.KelemenM. (2004). Deconstructing discourse. In GrantD.HardyC.OswickC.PutnamL. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 259-272). London, England: SAGE.
73.
KolodkoG. W. (2000). From shock to therapy: The political economy of postsocialist transformation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
74.
LaarM. (2009). Estonia’s new beginning. In RannuK. (Ed.), Estonia’s way into the European Union (pp. 8-15). Tallinn: Estonian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
75.
LamplandM. (2000). Afterword. In BerdahlD.BunzlM.LamplandM. (Eds.), Altering states: Ethnographies of transition in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union (pp. 209-218). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
76.
LavigneM. (2000). Ten years of transition: A review article. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 33, 475-483.
77.
LinzJ. L.StepanA. (1996). Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
78.
MandelbaumM. (Ed.). (1996). Postcommunism: Four perspectives. New York, NY: Council on Foreign Relations.
79.
MandellR.HumphreyC. (Eds.). (2002). Market and moralities: Ethnographies of postsocialism. Oxford, UK: Berg.
80.
Meyer-SahlingJ. (2009). Sustainability of civil service reforms in Central and Eastern Europe five years after EU accession (Sigma Papers No. 44). Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.
NunbergB. (2000). Ready for Europe: Public administration reform and European Union accession in Central and Eastern Europe (World Bank Technical Paper No. 466). Washington, D.C,: The World Bank.
83.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (1997a). Administrative procedures and the supervision of administration in Hungary, Poland, Bulgaria, Estonia and Albania (Sigma Papers No. 17). Paris, France: Author.
84.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (1997b). Promoting performance and professionalism in the public service (Sigma Papers No. 21). Paris, France: Author.
85.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (1998a). Preparing public administrations for the European administrative space (Sigma Papers No. 23). Paris, France: Author.
86.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (1998b). Sustainable institutions for European Union membership (Sigma Papers No. 26). Paris, France: Author.
87.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2011). Estonia: Towards a single government approach (OECD Public Governance Reviews). Paris, France: Author.
88.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development & Support for Improvement in Governance and Management (SIGMA). (2003). Estonia: Public service and the administrative framework assessment, 2003. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/site/sigma/
89.
ParajuliP. (1991). Power and knowledge in development discourse. International Social Science Journal, 127, 173-190.
90.
ParkerI. (1992). Discourse dynamics: Critical analysis for social and individual psychology. London, England: Routledge.
91.
PhillipsL.JørgensenM. W. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London, England: SAGE.
92.
PicklesJ.SmithA. (Eds). (1998). Theorizing transition: The political economy of post-communist transformation. London, England: Routledge.
93.
PollertA. (1999). Transformation at work in the new market economies of Central Eastern Europe. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
94.
PrzeworskiA. (1991). Democracy and the market: Political and economic reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
95.
Public Administration Bureau of the State Chancellery. (2001). Public administration reform programme of the government of the republic of Estonia.
96.
RabinowP. (1984). Polemics, politics, and problematizations: An interview with Michel Foucault. In RabinowP. (Ed.), The Foucault reader (pp. 381-390). New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
97.
RandmaT. (2001). A small civil service in transition: The case of Estonia. Public Administration and Development, 21, 41-51.
98.
Randma-LiivT. (2005). Performance management in transitional administration: Introduction of pay-for-performance in the Estonian civil service. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 7, 95-115.
99.
RiceE. M. (1992). Public administration in post-socialist Eastern Europe. Public Administration Review, 52 (2), 116-124.
100.
RistkokP. (2009). Domestic preparations for the utilization of European Union Structural Funds. In RannuK. (Ed.), Estonia’s way into the European Union (pp. 113-118). Tallinn: Estonian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
SachsW. (Ed.). (2010). The development dictionary: A guide to knowledge as power. London, England: Zed Books.
103.
SakwaR. (1999). Postcommunism. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
104.
SarupM. (1993). An introductory guide to post-structuralism and postmodernism. Athens, Greece: The University of Georgia Press.
105.
SaussureF. (1986). Course in general linguistics. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.
106.
Support for Improvement in Governance and Management (SIGMA). (1998). European principles for public administration (Sigma Papers No. 27). Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.
107.
SootlaG.RootsH. (1999). The civil service in the Republic of Estonia. In VerheijenT.KotcheguraA. (Eds.), Civil service systems in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 235-266). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
108.
StarkD.BrusztL. (1998). Postsocialist pathways: Transforming politics and property in East Central Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
109.
State Chancellery. (2004). Public administration in Estonia. Tallinn, Estonia: Riigi Teataja Kirjastus.
University of Tartu. (1999). Public administration reform in Estonia: An opinion.
112.
ThadhaniR. (2005). Between monocles and veils: Thinking postcolonialism in public administration. International Journal of Public Administration, 28, 973-988.
113.
TõnnissonK.Randma-LiivT. (2008). Public management reforms: Estonia. In BouckaertG.NemecJ.NakrošisV.HajnalG.TõnnissonK. (Eds.), Public management reforms in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 93-118). Bratislava, Slovakia: NISPAcee.
114.
Vabariigi Valitsuse Haldusreformi Asjatundjate Komisjon. (1999). Avaliku halduse arendamise alused. Retrieved from http://www.siseministeerium.ee/6229/
115.
Van DijkT. A. (Ed.). (1985). Handbook of discourse analysis. London, England: Academic Press.
116.
VerderyK. (1996). What was socialism, and what comes next?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
117.
VerderyK. (2002). Wither postsocialism? In HannC. M. (Ed.), Postsocialism: Ideals, ideologies, and practices in Eurasia (pp. 15-23). London, England: Routledge.
118.
VerheijenA. J. G. (2003). Public administration in post-communist states. In PetersB. G.PierreJ. (Eds.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 489-497). London, England: SAGE.
119.
WilligC. (2001). Foucauldian discourse analysis. In WilligC. (Ed), Introducing qualitative research in psychology: Adventures in theory and method (pp. 106-124). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
120.
WilsonW. (1887). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2, 197-222.
121.
WodakR.MeyerM. (Eds.). (2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
122.
World Bank. (1999). Estonia: Implementing the EU accession agenda (A World Bank Country Study). Washington, DC: Author.
