Using Kyrgyzstan as a source of data, this article answers the following questions about citizen engagement in budgeting: (a) What are the key challenges to implementing budget hearings in developing countries? and (b) What factors influence the sustainability of citizen engagement? It identifies several barriers hindering the implementation of local budget meetings, which range from simple organizational issues to complex problems—such as lack of trust and inadequate professional management skills. This study demonstrates that administrators and non-profit experts cite different types of impediments. The involvement of donors appears to have a positive impact on engagement practices in developing countries.
AdamsB. (2004). Public meetings and the democratic process. Public Administration Review, 64, 43-54.
2.
ArnsteinS. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216-224. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225
3.
BakerW.AddamsL.DavisB. (2005). Critical factors for enhancing municipal public hearings. Public Administration Review, 65, 490-499.
4.
BarberB. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5.
BermanE. (1997). Dealing with cynical citizens. Public Administration Review, 57, 105-112.
6.
BernerM.SmithS. (2004). The state of the states: A review of state requirements for citizen participation in the local government budget process. State and Local Government Review, 36, 140-150.
7.
BradyH.VerbaS.SchlozmanK. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review, 89, 271-294.
8.
CampbellA. L. (2002). Self-Interest, social security, and the distinctive participation patterns of senior citizens. American Political Science Review, 96, 565-574. doi:10.1017/S0003055402000333
9.
ConwayE. (2012). Kyrgyzstan in 2015: One step forward, two steps backward. Central Asia-Caucasus Institute. Retrieved from http://old.cacianalyst.org/?q=node/5729
10.
CreswellJ. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
DobrezovaN. (2010). The new mechanims of citizen participation in the budgeting process in the Kyrgyz Republic. Retrieved from www.logincee.org/file/24368/library. (In Russian)
12.
EbdonC.FranklinA. (2006). Citizen participation in budgeting theory. Public Administration Review, 66, 437-447. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00600.x
13.
FölscherA. (2007). Participatory budgeting in Central and Eastern Europe. In ShahA. (Ed.), Participatory budgeting. Public sector, governance, and accountability series (pp. 127-156). Washington, DC: World Bank.
14.
FranklinA.EbdonC. (2002, October). Citizen participation: Looks good on paper but hard to do in practice. 2002 ABFM Conference, Kansas City, MO.
15.
FranklinA.HoA.EbdonC. (2009). Participatory budgeting in Midwestern states: Democratic connection or citizen disconnection?Public Budgeting and Finance, 29, 52-73. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5850.2009.00936.x
16.
GaibulinaR.DobrezovaN. (2011). Public hearing on budgets: The experience of the Kyrgyz Republic. Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan: Institute of Policy Development and Alliance for Budget Transparency. (In Russian)
17.
Global Campaign on Urban Governance. (2004). 72 frequently asked questions about participatory budgeting. Nairobi, Kenya: The United Nations Human Settlement Programme (UN-HABITAT).
18.
GoetzA. M.GaventaJ. (2001). Bringing citizen voice and client focus into service delivery (IDS Working Paper 138). Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies.
19.
GoldfrankB.SchneiderA. (2006). Competitive institution building: The PT and participatory budgeting in Rio Grande do Sul. Latin American Politics and Society, 48(3), 1-31. doi:10.1111/j.1548-2456.2006.tb00354.x
20.
GuoD.NeshkovaM. (2013). Citizen input in the budget process: When does it matter most?The American Review of Public Administration, 43, 331-346.
21.
HartD. (1984). The virtuous citizen, the honorable bureaucrat, and “public” administration. Public Administration Review, 44, 111-120.
22.
HeB. (2011). Civic engagement through participatory budgeting in China: Three different logics at work. Public Administration and Development, 31, 122-133.
23.
KalkanovK. (2008). Public administration and local administration. Bishkek: Academy of Management Under the President of Kyrgyzstan. (In Russian)
KurmanbekovaR. (2010). The financial decentralization and the new principles of interbudgetary relations in the Kyrgyz Republic. Retrieved from http://www.koom.kg/view_material.php?id=296 (In Russian).
26.
LeighningerM. (2014). Want to increase trust in government? Update our public participation laws. Public Administration Review, 74, 305-306. doi:10.1111/puar.12208
27.
MartíC.RoyoS.AcereteB. (2012). The effect of new legislation on the disclosure of performance indicators: The case of Spanish local governments. International Journal of Public Administration, 35, 873-885.
28.
NabatchiT. (2010). Addressing the citizenship and democratic deficits: The potential of deliberative democracy for public administration. The American Review of Public Administration, 40, 376-399.
29.
National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. (2010). Social tendencies in the Kyrgyz Republic 2006–2009. Bishkek: Author.
30.
National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. (2011). 20 years of independence of the Kyrgyz Republic: Figures and facts. Bishkek: Author.
31.
NeshkovaM. (2014). Does agency autonomy foster public participation?Public Administration Review, 74, 64-74. doi:10.1111/puar.12180
32.
NieN.JunnJ.Stehlik-BarryK. (1996). Education and democratic citizenship in America. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
33.
PatemanC. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
34.
PattonM. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
35.
PaulS. (2007). India: Civic participation in subnational budgeting. In ShahA. (Ed.), Participatory budgeting: Public sector governance and accountability series (pp. 31-48). Washington, DC: World Bank.
36.
SchachterH. (1997). Reinventing of government or reinventing ourselves. Albany: State University of New York Press.
37.
SchneiderA.IngramH. (1993). Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review, 87, 334-347.
38.
United Nations Development Programme. (2013). Human development as the focus of local self-government: Here and now!Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan: Author.
39.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L.BradyH.NieN. (1993). Race, ethnicity and political resources: Participation in the United States. British Journal of Political Science, 23, 453-497.
