A national financial collapse can engender a heightened gubernatorial sense of accountability, leadership, and learning. An attempt at theory building on this theme uses governors’ 2009 speeches as an historical artifact and policy document recording the kind of rhetoric they employed during the “Great Recession.” A quantitative analysis reveals correlations between gubernatorial characteristics and rhetoric. A qualitative approach yields gubernatorial constructs of accountability, leadership, and learning at a time of crisis. The results offer a foundation for further theory building using cross-sectional and longitudinal data.
AbneyG.LauthT. P. (1998). The end of executive dominance in state appropriations. Public Administration Review, 58, 338-394.
2.
AntonT. J. (1966). The politics of state expenditures in Illinois. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
3.
BernickE. L.WigginsC. W. (1991). Executive-legislative relations: The governor’s role as chief legislator. In HerzikE. B.BrownB. W. (Eds.), Gubernatorial leadership and state policy (pp. 73-91). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
4.
BrandH. (1992, December). The end of Keynesianism as employment policy. Monthly Labor Review, pp. 42-45.
5.
CarpenterD.M.HughesH. (2011). Gubernatorial rhetoric and the purpose of education in the United States. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership6(6), 1-15.
CoffeyD. (2005). Measuring gubernatorial ideology: A content analysis of State of the State speeches. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 5, 88-103.
8.
ConantJ. K. (2010a). Budget deficits in the states: Virginia. Public Budgeting & Finance, 30(1), 33-57.
9.
ConantJ. K. (2010b). Introduction: The “Great Recession,” state budgets, and state budget deficits. Public Budgeting & Finance, 30(1), 1-14.
10.
CrewR. E.Jr. (1998). Gubernatorial leadership: Testing a preliminary model. The Social Science Journal, 35, 15-27.
11.
CrewR. E.Jr.LewisC. (2011). Verbal style, gubernatorial strategies, and legislative success. Political Psychology, 32, 623-642.
12.
DautrichK.RobbinsM. D.SimonsenB. (2010). Budget deficits in the states: Connecticut. Public Budgeting & Finance, 30(1), 130-151.
13.
DileoD. (1997). Dynamic representation in the American states. State and Local Government Review, 29, 98-109.
14.
DilgerR. J.KrauseG.MoffettR. (1995). State legislative professionalism and gubernatorial effectiveness, 1978-1991. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 20, 553-571.
15.
DometriusN. C.WrightD. S. (2010). Governors, legislatures, and state budgets across time. Political Research Quarterly, 63, 783-795.
16.
FergusonM. (2013). Governors and the executive branch. In GrayV.HansonR.KousserT. (Eds.), Politics in the American states: A comparative analysis (pp. 208-250). Washington, DC: Sage.
17.
FergusonM. R. (2003). Chief executive success in the legislative arena. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 3, 158-182.
18.
ForsytheD. (2004). Memos to the governor. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
19.
GoodmanD. (2007). Determinants of perceived gubernatorial influence among state executive budget analysts and legislative fiscal analysts. Political Research Quarterly, 60, 43-54.
20.
GrossD. A. (1991). The policy role of governors. In HerzikE. B. (Ed.), Gubernatorial leadership and state policy (pp. 1-24). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
21.
HaleG. E. (2013). State budgets, governors, and their influence on “big picture” issues: A case study of Delaware Governor Pete du Pont 1977-1985. Administration & Society, 45, 127-144.
22.
HansenS. B. (1999). “Life is not fair”: Governors’ job performance ratings and state economies. Political Research Quarterly, 51, 167-188.
23.
HeidbrederB. (2012). Agenda setting in the states: How politics and policy needs shape gubernatorial agendas. Politics & Policy, 40, 296-318.
24.
HerzikE. B.BrownB. W. (1991). Gubernatorial leadership and state policy. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
25.
HowardS. K. (1973). Changing state budgeting. Lexington, KY: Council of State Governments.
26.
JacksonJ. E.KingdonJ. W. (1992). Ideology, interest group scores, and legislative votes. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 805-823.
27.
KrauseG. A.MeluskyB. F. (2012). Concentrated powers: Unilateral executive authority and fiscal policymaking in the American states. The Journal of Politics, 74, 98-112.
28.
KuninM. M. (1990). The rewards of public service. In BehnR. D. (Ed.), Governors on governing (pp. 49-56). Washington, DC: National Governors’ Association.
29.
LauthT. P. (2010). Budget deficits in the states: Georgia. Public Budgeting & Finance, 30(1), 15-32.
30.
MazzoniT. L. (1995). State policy-making and school reform: Influences and influentials. In ScribnerJ. D.LaytonD. H. (Eds.), The study of educational politics (pp. 53-73). London, England: Falmer.
RosenthalA. (2013). The best job in politics: How governors succeed as policy leaders. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
33.
RubinH. J.RubinI. S. (2011). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
SchickA. (1971). Budget innovation in the states. Washington, DC: Brookings.
35.
SegalJ. A.CoverA. D. (1989). Ideological values and the votes of U.S. Supreme Court justices. American Political Science Review, 83, 557-565.
36.
SharkanskyI. (1968). Agency requests, gubernatorial support, and budget success in state legislatures. American Political Science Review, 62, 1220-1231.
37.
SimonH. A. (1947). Administrative behavior: A study of decision making processes in administrative organization. New York, NY: Macmillan.
