In advancing his views on regime values, John Rohr pointed to the limitations and dangers of approaches that seek to ground administrative ethics on the pursuit of any single value or understanding of that value. This article examines the neorepublican conception of freedom and shows how this single-minded conception of freedom can deflect attention away from the conflicts of values, including conflicts among our conceptions of freedom, that characterize our moral and political experience.
FriedmanM. (2008). Pettit’s civic republicanism and male domination. In LabordeC.MaynorJ. (Eds.), Republicanism and political theory (pp. 246-268). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
4.
LarmoreC. (2001). A critique of Philip Pettit’s republicanism. Philosophical Issues, 11, 229-243.
5.
LovettF.PettitP. (2009). Neorepublicanism: A normative and institutional research program. Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 11-29.
6.
PettitP. (1999). Republicanism: A theory of freedom and government. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7.
RohrJ. A. (1976). The study of ethics in the P. A. curriculum. Public Administration Review, 36, 398-406.
8.
RohrJ. A. (1986). To run a constitution. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
9.
SkinnerQ. (1998). Liberty before liberalism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
