What determines professional motivations and values of security operatives: sector or profession? Our article aims to answer this question through a survey study among police officers (n = 405) and private security guards (n = 329) in the Netherlands. Our results show that both groups closely resemble each other in how they prioritize motivations and values, although police officers have a slightly more “missionary” and “crime fighting” work ethic than private security guards. Mutual perceptions, however, reveal contrasts: Police officers look down on private security guards, while private security guards look up to police officers. We conclude with theoretical and practical implications of our findings.
AndersenJ. A. (2010). Public versus private managers: How public and private managers differ in leadership behavior. Public Administration Review, 70, 131-141.
2.
BozemanB. (2004). All organizations are public (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
3.
BrodeurJ. P. (1983). High-policing and low-policing: Some remarks about the policing of political activities. Social Problems, 30, 507-521.
4.
BuelensM.Van den BroeckH. (2007). An analysis of differences in work motivation between public and private sector organizations. Public Administration Review, 67, 65-74.
5.
ButtonM. (2007). Security officers and policing: Powers, culture and control in the governance of private space. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
6.
ChanJ. B. L. (1997). Changing police culture: Policing in a multicultural society. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
7.
ClarkeJ.NewmanJ. (1997). The managerial state: Power, politics and ideology in the remaking of social welfare. London, England: Sage.
8.
De GraafG.van der WalZ. (2008). On value differences experienced by sector switchers. Administration & Society, 40, 79-103.
9.
FlemingJ.WoodJ. (Eds.). (2006). Fighting crime together: The challenges of policing and security networks. Sydney, Australia: NSW Press.
10.
FredericksonH. G. (2005). Public ethics and the new managerialism: An axiomatic theory. In FredericksonH. G.GhereR. K. (Eds.), Ethics in public management (pp. 165-183). New York, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
11.
GregoryR. J. (1999). Social capital theory and administrative reform: Maintaining ethical probity in public service. Public Administration Review, 59, 63-76.
12.
JacobsJ. (1992). Systems of survival: A dialogue on the moral foundations of commerce and politics. New York, NY: Random House.
13.
KarlK. A.SuttonC. L. (1998). Job values in today’s workforce: A comparison of public and private sector employees. Public Personnel Management, 22, 515-527.
14.
KolthoffE. W. (2007). Ethics and new public management: Empirical research into the effects of businesslike government on ethics and integrity (Doctoral dissertation). BJU, The Hague, Netherlands.
15.
LasthuizenK. (2008). Leading to integrity: Empirical research into the effects of leadership on ethics and integrity (Doctoral dissertation). Printpartners Ipskamp, Enschede, Netherlands.
16.
LipskyM. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
17.
LivingstoneK.HartJ. (2003). The wrong arm of the law? Public images of private security. Policing & Society, 13, 159-170.
18.
LoaderI. (1997). Policing and the social: Questions of symbolic power. British Journal of Sociology, 48, 1-18.
19.
LoaderI.WalkerN. (2001). Policing as a public good: Reconstituting the connections between policing and the state. Theoretical Criminology, 5, 9-35.
LoyensK. (2009). Occupational culture in policing reviewed: A comparison of values in the public and private police. International Journal of Public Administration, 32, 461-490.
22.
LyonsS. T.DuxburyL. E.HigginsC. A. (2006). A comparison of the values and commitment of private sector, public sector, and parapublic sector employees. Public Administration Review, 66, 605-618.
23.
ManzoJ. (2006). “You can’t rent a cop”: Mall security officers’ management of a “stigmatized” occupation. Security Journal, 19, 196-210.
24.
ManzoJ. (2009). How private security officers perceive themselves relative to the police. Security Journal, 23, 192-205.
25.
Netherlands Project Group Vision on Policing. (2006). The police in evolution: Vision on policing. The Hague, Netherlands: Dutch police.
26.
OsborneD.GaeblerT. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, PA: Addison-Wesley.
27.
PosnerB. Z.SchmidtW. H. (1996). The values of business and federal government executives: More different than alike. Public Personnel Management, 25, 277-289.
28.
ReinerR. (1992). Policing a postmodern society. The Modern Law Review, 55, 761-781.
29.
Reuss-IanniE. (1983). Two cultures of policing: Street cops and management cops. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
30.
RigakosG. (2002). The new parapolice: Risk markets and commodified social control. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
31.
SchwartzS. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65.
32.
SinghA. M.KempaM. (2007). Reflections on the study of private policing cultures: Early leads and key themes. In O’NeillM.MarksM.SinghA. M. (Eds.), Sociology of crime, law and deviance—Police occupational culture: New debates and directions (Vol. 8, pp. 297-320). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
33.
SklanskyD. A. (2006). Private police and democracy. American Criminal Law Review, 43, 89-105.
34.
SkolnickJ. (2002). Corruption and the blue code of silence. Police Practice & Research, 3, 7-19.
35.
StackmanR. W.ConnorP. E.BeckerB. W. (2006). Sectoral ethos: A comparison of the personal values systems of female and male managers in the public and private sectors. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 577-597.
36.
StenningP. C. (2000). Powers and accountability of private police. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 8, 325-352.
37.
ThumalaA.GooldB.LoaderI. (2011). A tainted trade? Moral ambivalence and legitimation work in the private security industry. The British Journal of Sociology, 62, 283-303.
38.
Van der WalZ. (2008). Value solidity: Differences, similarities and conflicts between the organizational values of government and business (Doctoral dissertation). Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
39.
Van der WalZ.De GraafG.LawtonA. (2011). Competing values in public management. Introduction to the symposium issue. Public Management Review, 13, 331-341.
40.
Van StedenR. (2007). Privatizing policing: Describing and explaining the growth of private security (Doctoral dissertation). BJU, The Hague, Netherlands.
41.
Van ThielS.van der WalZ. (2010). Birds of a feather? The effect of organizational value congruence on the relationship between ministries and Quangos. Public Organization Review, 10, 377-397.
42.
WallD. S. (2007). Policing cybercrimes: Situating the public police in networks of security within cyberspace. Police Practice & Research, 8, 183-205.
43.
WhiteA. (2012). The new political economy of private security. Theoretical Criminology, 16, 85-101.
44.
WoodJ. (2004). Cultural change in the governance of security. Policing & Society, 14, 31-48.
