Recent debates surrounding immigration policy have underscored the challenges facing local administrators. This article explores administrators’ attitudes toward documented and undocumented immigrants and their beliefs about immigrants’ participation in local government. A survey of municipal administrators was conducted in Arizona. Results indicate that administrators who believed undocumented immigrants are associated with problems for their cities were less interested in having undocumented immigrants participate in local government, and, moreover, that administrators made distinctions between documented and undocumented immigrants. Public safety administrators tended to be less inclined to encourage the civic participation of undocumented immigrants than other administrators.
BabbieE. (2011). The Practice of Social Research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
2.
BoxR. (1998). Citizen governance: Leading American cities into the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
CampbellK. (2005). Theorizing the authentic: Identity, engagement, and public space. Administration & Society, 36, 688-705.
4.
City of Hazelton, PA. Ordinance, (2006-18). Illegal Immigration Relief Act Ordinance. Retrieved from www.hazeltoncity.org
5.
CooperT. L. (1990). The responsible administrator: An approach to Ethics for the administrator (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA. Jossey-Bass.
6.
DeckerS. H.LewisP. G.ProvineD. M.VarsanyiM. W. (2009). On the frontier of local law enforcement: Local police and federal immigration law. In McDonaldW. F. (Ed.), Immigration, crime, and justice (pp. 263-278). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
7.
FollettM. P. (1965). The new state. Gloucester, MA: Pete Smith. (Original work published 1918)
8.
JulnesP.JohnsonD. (2011). Strengthening efforts to engage the Hispanic community in citizen-driven governance: An assessment of efforts in Utah. Public Administration Review, 71, 221-231.
9.
KingC. K.StiversC. S. (1998). Government is us: Public administration in an anti-government era editors. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
LewisP. G.ProvineD. M.VarsanyiM. W.DeckerS. H. (2012). Why do (some) city police departments enforce federal immigration law? Political, demographic, and organizational influences on local choices. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23, 1-25.
11.
LewisP. G.RamakrishnanS. K. (2007). Police practices in immigrant-destination cities: Political control or bureaucratic professionalism?Urban Affairs Review, 42, 874-900.
12.
LucioJ. (2009). Customers, citizens, and residents: The semantics of public service recipients. Administration & Society, 41, 878-899.
13.
MarrowH. B. (2009). Immigrant bureaucratic incorporation: The dual roles of professional missions and government policies. American Sociological Review, 74, 756-776.
14.
MeierK. J.O’TooleL. J. (2006). Political control versus bureaucratic values: Reframing the debate. Public Administration Review, 66, 177-192.
15.
MotomuraH. (2008). Immigration outside the law. Columbia Law Review, 108, 2037-2096.
16.
NalbandianJ. (1999). Facilitating community, enabling democracy: New roles for local government managers. Public Administration Review, 59, 187-197.
17.
PopeP. J.GarrettT. M. (2012). America’s Homo Sacer: Examining U.S. deportation hearings and the criminalization of illegal immigration. Administration & Society, 45(2), 167-186.
18.
RodriguezC. (2008). The significance of the local in immigration regulation. Michigan Law Review, 106, 567-642.
19.
SchachterH. L.LiuR. (2005). Policy development and new immigrant communities: A case study of citizen input in defining transit problems. Public Administration Review, 65, 614-623.
20.
StiversC. (1994). The listening bureaucrat: Responsiveness in public administration. Public Administration Review, 54, 364-369.
21.
SullivanL. (2009). Enforcing nonenforcement: Countering the threat posed to sanctuary laws by the inclusion of immigration records in the national crime information center database. California Law Review, 97, 567-600.
22.
Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act, SB 1070 Stat. (2010).
VarsanyiM. W. (2005). The rise and fall (and rise?) of non-citizen voting: Immigration and the shifting scales of citizenship ad suffrage in the United States. Space & Polity, 9, 113-134.
25.
VarsanyiM. W. (2008). Rescaling the “alien,” rescaling personhood: Neoliberalism, immigration and the state. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 98, 877-896.
26.
VarsanyiM. W.LewisP. G.ProvineD. M.DeckerS. H. (2012). A multilayered jurisdictional patchwork: Immigration federalism in the United States. Law & Policy, 34, 138-158.
27.
VigodaE. (2002). From responsiveness to collaboration: Governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration. Public Administration Review, 62, 527-540.
28.
VinzantJ. C.CrothersL. (1998). Street-level leadership: Discretion and legitimacy in front-line public service. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
29.
YangK.CallahanK. (2007). Citizen involvement efforts and bureaucratic responsiveness: Participatory values, stakeholder pressures, and administrative practicality. Public Administration Review, 67, 249-264.
