The sherpa is offered as a helpful metaphor amid the rich and diverse metaphorical landscape describing public administration at the interface between senior public servants and ministers. The sherpa model acknowledges the complexity and nuanced leadership now demanded in the Westminster tradition, offering fresh tools for practitioners to think more critically about their role and how they can improve leadership skills. It also offers theoretical ability to incorporate relevant but underdeveloped factors, such as the environment, into the administrative leadership equation, thus enlarging issues at stake and forces demanding scrutiny, if administrative leadership is to be better understood.
AlthausC. (2011). Assessing the capacity to deliver—The BER experience. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 70, 421-436.
2.
AlthausC.WannaJ. (2008). The institutionalization of leadership in the Australian public sector. In ‘t HartP.UhrJ. (Eds.), Public leadership: Perspectives and practices (pp. 117-131). Canberra, Australia: ANU E-Press. .
3.
AlvessonM.SpicerA. (Eds.). (2011). Metaphors we lead by: Understanding leadership in the real world. London, England: Routledge.
BourgaultJ. (2007, August). The changing role of the deputy minister in Canadian governments. Lecture in honor of Joe Galimberti presented at IPAC Annual Conference, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
6.
ChangS. (2005, December5-7). Responsive public services in building a harmonious society. Workshop Paper presented to the Network of Asia-Pacific Schools and Institutes of Public Administration and Governance Annual Conference, Beijing, China.
FrenchJ.RavenB. H. (1959). The bases of social power. In CartwrightD. (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 259-269). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
9.
GoodsellC. T. (2004). The case for bureaucracy: A public administration polemic (4th ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
10.
GranatsteinJ. L. (1982). The Ottawa men: The civil service mandarins 1935-1957. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Oxford University Press.
11.
GreenleafR. (2002). Servant leadership: A Journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.
12.
HajnalP. I. (2007). The G8 system and the G20: Evolution, role and documentation (2nd ed.). Surrey, British Columbia, Canada: Ashgate.
13.
HalliganJ. (2007). Repositioning Australian public governance: Three generations of management reform at commonwealth level. In CaidenG. E.SuT. T. (Eds.), The repositioning of public governance (pp. 93-125). Taipei, Taiwan: Best-Wise.
14.
HenckeD. (2009, February13). Sir Brian Bender is a top Whitehall Mandarin. So what was he doing at Wimbledon, the Derby and the Chelsea Flower Show?Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/feb/13/whitehall
15.
House of Commons Public Administration Select Committee. (2008). Mandarins unpeeled: Memoirs and commentary by former ministers and civil servants. London, England: The Stationery Office.
16.
KaneJ. (2007). The problem of politics: Public governance and leadership. In KochR.DixonJ. (Eds.), Public governance and leadership (pp. 131-149). Wiesbaden, Germany: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.
17.
KavanaghD.RichardsD. (2003). Prime ministers, ministers and civil servants in Britain. In DoganM. (Ed.), Elite configurations at the Apex of Power (pp. 175-196). Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.
18.
KellermanB.WebsterS. (2001). The recent literature on public leadership: Reviewed and considered. Leadership Quarterly, 12, 485-514.
MousnierR.ClarkeM.EvansP. (1973). Social hierarchies. 1450 to the present (P. Evans, Trans.). London, England: Taylor and Francis.
26.
OberlechnerT.Mayer-SchönbergerV. (2002, October). Through their own words: Towards a new understanding of leadership through Metaphors (Working Paper Series No RWP02-043). Boston, MA: Kennedy School of Government.
27.
OrtnerS. B. (1989). High religion: A cultural and political history of Sherpa Buddhism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
PodgerA. (2009). The role of departmental secretaries: Personal reflections on the breadth of responsibilities today. Canberra, Australia: ANU E-Press.
30.
PodgerA.SimicA.HaltonJ.ShergoldP.MaherT. (2004). Integrated leadership system in the Australian Public Service. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 63(4), 108-118.
PyeL. W. (1988). The mandarin and the cadre: China’s political cultures. Ann Arbor: Center for Chinese Studies The University of Michigan.
33.
Quebec Lung Association. (2011). Did you know that a Sherpa is not a profession but a member of an ethnic group? Retrieved from http://www.pq.lung.ca/everest2009/sherpa/
34.
RaineyH. (2009). Understanding and managing public organizations (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
35.
ReinkeS. (2004). Service before self: Towards a theory of Servant-Leadership. Global Virtue Ethics Review, 5(3), 30-57.
36.
RowseT. (2002). Nugget Coombs: A reforming life. Port Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press.
SchachterH. L. (2002). Administrative culture and Metaphor change. International Review of Sociology, 12, 89-92.
39.
SementelliA. J.AbelC. F. (2007). Metaphor, cultural imagery, and the study of change in public organizations. Journal of Organizational Change, 20, 652-670.
40.
SheaffR.PickardS.SmithK. (2002). Public service responsiveness to users’ demands and needs: Theory, practice and primary healthcare in England. Public Administration, 80, 435-452.
41.
ShergoldP. (2004). “Lackies, careerists, political stooges?” Personal reflections on the current state of public service leadership. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 63(4), 3-13.
SwaffieldS. (1998). Frames of reference: A metaphor for analyzing and interpreting attitudes of environmental policy makers and policy influences. Environmental Management, 22, 495-504.
44.
TenzingN. (1955). Man of Everest: The autobiography of Tenzing. Told to J.R. Ullman. London, England: G.G. Harrap.
45.
TerryL. D. (1997). Public administration and the theater Metaphor: The public administrator as villain, hero and innocent victim. Public Administration Review, 57, 53-61.
46.
‘t HartP.WannaJ. (2011). The treasury and the global financial crisis (A) and (B). Australia and New Zealand school of government case program. Melbourne, Australia: ANZSOG. Retrieved from www.casestudies.anzsog.edu.au.
47.
TiernanA. (2007). Power without responsibility: Ministerial staffers in Australian governments from Whitlam to Howard. Crow’s Nest, Australia: University of New South Wales Press.
48.
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. (2007). A special calling: Values, ethics and professional public service (Section 3. The arrival of the administrative state [1919-1964]). Retrieved from http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/rp/scv04-eng.asp
49.
VakilT. (2009). Changing public service values: Limits of fundamental reform and rhetoric (Doctoral dissertation). University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
50.
Vander SteenB. (2009). Measuring innovation in the BC public sector: Developing a performance measurement framework for IGRS’ innovation program (Master’s thesis). University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
51.
Van SlykeD. M.AlexanderR. W. (2006). Public service leadership opportunities for clarity and coherence. The American Review of Public Administration, 36, 362-374.
52.
Van WartM. (2003). Public sector leadership: An assessment. Public Administration Review, 63, 214-228.
53.
VinzantJ.CrothersL. (1998). Street-level leadership: Discretion and legitimacy in Front-Line public service. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
54.
WellerP. (2001). Australia’s mandarins, The frank & the fearless?Crow’s Nest, New South Wales, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
55.
WellerP.RhodesR. A. W. (Eds.). (2001). The changing world of top officials: Mandarins or valets?Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
56.
WellerP.WannaJ. (1997). Departmental secretaries: Appointment, termination and their impact. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 56(4), 13-25.
