An essential question for American public administration scholarship is to what degree does (and should) our constitutional heritage influence our approach to administering the public sphere, and has this changed over time. Much scholarship addresses these questions from a normative theoretical perspective. This study investigates whether the normative claim made by the constitutionalist scholars, that the U.S. Constitution should guide public administrative practice, is actually born out of the practice. A longitudinal content analysis of Office of Management and Budget Circular A-76 from 1966 to 2003 provides evidence that the Constitutionalist Public Administration Paradigm is the predominant public administration paradigm in all the Circulars.
AndersonL.BishopP. (2005). E-government to e-democracy: Communicative mechanisms of governance. Journal of E-Government, 2(1), 5-26.
2.
AndersonL.BishopP. (2011). Communicative mechanisms of governance: E-democracy and the architecture of the public sphere. In RobertC.WilliamK. (Eds.), Information and communication technologies and virtual public spheres: Impacts of network structures on civil society (pp. 52-71). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
3.
ArgyrisC. (1999). On organizational learning (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
4.
BallT. (Ed.). (1987). Idioms of inquiry: Critique and renewal in political science. Albany: State University of New York Press.
5.
BergerP. L.LuckmannT. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
6.
BishopP.ConnorsC. (2003). The new public sector: Changing management, organisation and ethics management, organisation, and ethics in the public sector. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
7.
BogdanorV. (2009). The New British Constitution. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.
8.
BovensM.YesilkagitK. (2010). The EU as lawmaker: The impact of EU directives on national regulation in the Netherlands. Public Administration, 88, 57-74.
9.
BurrellG.MorganG. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
10.
ChristensenJ. G. (2010a). EU legislation and national regulation: Uncertain steps towards a European public policy. Public Administration, 88, 3-17.
11.
ChristensenJ. G. (2010b). Keeping in control: The modest impact of the EU on Danish legislation. Public Administration, 88, 18-35.
12.
CookB. J. (2007). Democracy and administration: Woodrow Wilson’s ideas and the challenges of public management. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
13.
CooperP. J. (2006). Public law and public administration (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thompson Wadsworth.
14.
DobelP. (2001). Paradigms, traditions, and keeping the faith. Public Administration Review, 61, 166-171.
15.
FeldmanD. L. (1993). Public administration and the constitution. Public Administration Review, 53, 237-239.
16.
FeyerabendP. (1993). Against method: Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. London, England: Verso.
17.
FlindersM. (2008). Delegated governance and the British State: Walking without order. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
18.
FullerS. (2000). Thomas Kuhn: A philosophical history of our time. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19.
GoodsellC. T. (1984). The new meaning of government. Public Administration Review, 44, 193.
20.
GoodsellC. T. (2004). The case for bureaucracy: A public administration polemic (4th ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
21.
GoreA. (1993). From red tape to results: Creating a government that works better and costs less. A report by Al Gore and The National Performance Review.
22.
GrahamG. A. (1993). How Professor Wilson would rate public administration today. Public Administration Review, 53, 486-502.
HoodC. (1995). The “New public management” in the eighties. Accounting, Organization, and Society, 20, 93-109.
25.
JennyM.MüllerW. C. (2010). From the Europeanization of lawmaking to the Europeanization of national legal orders: The case of Austria. Public Administration, 88, 36-56.
26.
KingA. (2007). The British constitution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27.
KuhnT. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28.
LaudanL. (1977). Progress and its problems: Toward a theory of scientific growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.
29.
LeeY. S.RosenbloomD. H. (2005). A reasonable public servant: Constitutional foundations of administrative conduct in the United States. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
30.
LevinsonS. (2006). Our undemocratic constitution: Where the constitution goes wrong. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
31.
LowiT. J. (1993). Legitimizing public administration: A disturbed dissent. Public Administration Review, 53, 261-264.
32.
LynnL. E. (1996). Public management as art, science, and profession. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
33.
MartinD. W. (1988). The fading legacy of Woodrow Wilson. Public Administration Review, 48, 631-636.
34.
MastermanM. (1970). The nature of the paradigm. In LakatosI.MusgraveA. (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Proceedings of the 1965 International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science (3rd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 59-90). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
35.
McSwiteO. C. (1997). Legitimacy in public administration: Discourse analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
MoeR. C. (1987). Exploring the limits of privatization. Public Administration Review, 47, 453-460.
37.
MoeR. C. (1990). Traditional organizational principles and the managerial presidency: From Phoenix to Ashes. Public Administration Review, 50, 129-140.
38.
MoeR. C. (1994). The “reinventing government” exercise: Misinterpreting the problem, misjudging the consequences. Public Administration Review, 54, 111-122.
39.
MoeR. C. (1997). The importance of public law: New and old paradigms of government management. In CooperP. J.NewlandC. A. (Eds.), Handbook of public law and administration (pp. 41-57). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
40.
MoeR. C. (2001). The emerging federal quasi government: Issues of management and accountability. Public Administration Review, 61, 290-312.
41.
MoeR. C. (2004). Governance principles: The neglected basis of federal management. In StantonT. H.GinsbergB. (Eds.), Making government manageable: Executive organization and management in the twenty-first century (pp. 21-39). Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.
42.
MoeR. C.GilmourR. S. (1995). Rediscovering principles of public administration: The neglected foundation of public law. Public Administration Review, 55, 135-146.
OstromV.OstromE. (1971). Public choice: A different approach to the study of public administration. Public Administration Review, 31, 203-216.
49.
PfefferJ. (1993). Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review, 18, 599-620.
50.
PittJ. C. (Ed.). (1985). Change and progress in modern science. Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel.
51.
PollittC. (1993). Managerialism and the public service (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
52.
PollittC. (1996). Antistatist reforms and new administrative directions: Public administration in the United Kingdom. Public Administration Review, 56, 81-87.
PollittC.BouckaertG. (2000). Public management reform. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
55.
RohrJ. A. (1986). To run a constitution: The legitimacy of the administrative state. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
56.
RohrJ. A. (1989). Ethics for bureaucrats: An essay on law and values (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
57.
RohrJ. A. (1993). Toward a more perfect union. Public Administration Review, 53, 246-249.
58.
RohrJ. A. (1995). Founding republics in France and America: A study in constitutional governance. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
59.
RohrJ. A. (1998). Public service, ethics and constitutional practice. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
60.
RohrJ. A. (2002). Civil servants and their constitutions. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
61.
RosenbloomD. H. (1971). Federal service and the constitution: The development of the public service relationship. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
62.
RosenbloomD. H. (1983). Public administrative theory and the separation of powers. Public Administration Review, 43, 219-226.
63.
RosenbloomD. H. (2003). Administrative law for public managers. Cambridge, MA: Westview Press.
64.
RosenbloomD. H.CarrollJ. D.CarrollJ. D. (2000). Constitutional competence for public managers: Cases and commentary. Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock.
65.
RosserC. (2010). Woodrow Wilson’s administrative thought and German political theory. Public Administration Review, 70, 547-556.
66.
SpicerM. W.TerryL. D. (1993a). Advancing the dialogue: Legitimacy, the founders, and the contractarian argument. Public Administration Review, 53, 264-267.
67.
SpicerM. W.TerryL. D. (1993b). Legitimacy, history, and logic: Public administration and the constitution. Public Administration Review, 53, 239-246.
68.
StiversC. (1993). Rationality and romanticism in constitutional argument. Public Administration Review, 53, 254-257.
69.
van RiperP. P. (1983). The American administrative state: Wilson and the founders—An unorthodox view. Public Administration Review, 43, 477-490.
70.
WamsleyG. L.BacherR. N.GoodsellC. T.KronenbergP. S.RohrJ. A.StiversC. M.WolfJ. W. (1990). Refounding public administration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
71.
WamsleyG. L.WolfJ. F. (Eds.). (1996). Refounding democratic public administration: Modern paradoxes, postmodern challenges. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
72.
WarrenK. F. (1993). We have debated Ad Nauseam the legitimacy of the administrative state—But why?Public Administration Review, 53, 249-254.
73.
WilmottH. (1993). Breaking the paradigm mentality. Organizational Studies, 14, 681-719.
74.
WilsonW. (1887). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2, 197-222.
75.
WiseC. R. (1993). Public administration is constitutional and legitimate. Public Administration Review, 53, 257-261.
76.
ZinkeR. C. (1992). American constitutionalism in the interconnected world: Administrative responsibilities in a rhetorical republic. In BaileyM. T.MayerR. T. (Eds.), Public management in an interconnected world: Essays in the Minnowbrook tradition (pp. 145-158). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
